J-15 carrier-borne fighter thread

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
To me it all looks pretty regular. Nose cone seems the same, pitot tube is there too. Wingtip missile is PL-8, suggesting the old style pylon. Engine could also be AL-31, though with this latest WS10 variant having similar nozzle length to AL-31, it's really too hard to tell. Doesn't seem to be the extra beefy front LG strut present either, so it does look like a regular J-15 to me.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
To me it all looks pretty regular. Nose cone seems the same, pitot tube is there too. Wingtip missile is PL-8, suggesting the old style pylon. Engine could also be AL-31, though with this latest WS10 variant having similar nozzle length to AL-31, it's really too hard to tell. Doesn't seem to be the extra beefy front LG strut present either, so it does look like a regular J-15 to me.


Indeed, ... I'm sorry, but I agree.
 

by78

General
33 and 34 from the third batch. The images are from a Shandong's exercise recently.

50718897558_3016a60c5b_k.jpg

50718899618_cdd47939e2_k.jpg
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
This is another surprise :-o ... so far J-15s have only been seen with numbers between 01 and 24 after the Batch 01 & 02 aircraft have been renumbered and no. 31-35 for the latest Batch 03, this J-15 however clearly carries the no. 62.

(Image courtesy of SSJ via Huitong's CMA-Blog)

J-15_62.jpg
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
Well, first we should get more and clearer images so we can confirm it's not someone's joke, meaning a PSed image. Unlike the above 33 image, for example, this 62 one is of very poor quality, with visible image artifacts, making it easier to hide a PSed job underneath it all.
 

dawn_strike

New Member
Registered Member
Well, first we should get more and clearer images so we can confirm it's not someone's joke, meaning a PSed image. Unlike the above 33 image, for example, this 62 one is of very poor quality, with visible image artifacts, making it easier to hide a PSed job underneath it all.
Well I found the original video and it really was 62. It‘s from an official news report.
微信图片_20201217191937.jpg
I took this sreenshot from my smartphone so it is still of poor quality.
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
Thanks! Okay, so going forward with the notion that number 62 is real - another question may arise.
Are there examples of Chinese forces going with non clearly defined numbers for two or more different units?
Meaning, could perhaps regiment/brigade/unit 1 have numbers 1 through 24.
Then unit 2 have numbers 31 to 54?
Then unit 3 with numbers 61 to 84?

Or are the examples which would indicate the following kind of distribution:
Unit one with numbers 1 through 24
Unit two with numbers 25 through 48
Unit three with numbers 49 through 72?

Or are there examples with absolutely no clear delineation between units, like this:
Unit 1 with 1 through 24
Unit 2 with 27 through 50
Unit 3 with 59 through 82?

I am sure there are many more other options possible as well.
 

GTI

Junior Member
Registered Member
Wings and stabilizers folded.

50731072416_c5026b57aa_h.jpg

50730343533_7675d31806_h.jpg
Amazing pictures as always (thank you).

The J-15 looks like it’s carrying a decent amount of ordnance. I have been studying PLA munitions furiously - but I was wondering if someone could help to identify what it’s carrying?

(apologies if this request is “low-effort”, if so let me know and I’ll just shut up and study in future)
 
Top