CV-18 Fujian/003 CATOBAR carrier thread

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I've always wondered why so many small modules are built. Why not put them together in half a hull. Now I know: to be able to transport them across the street, the modules couldn't be bigger.


Indeed ... for something like this. Would be interesting if we ever will see images of these modules on their way?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

PLN Type 003 carrier - flatbed carrier XXL.jpg
 
Last edited:

by78

General
Indeed ... for something like this. Would be interesting if we ever will see images of these modules on their way?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

View attachment 60789


This transport vehicle was apparently acquired in 2014. To date, the largest module transported was 2000 metric tons. Note the module in the images below does NOT belong to the carrier.


49988754852_b32164bc4b_b.jpg

49988035968_5799daefd3_o.jpg
 
Last edited:

H2O

Junior Member
Registered Member
If I understood this correctly, the forward half was transported via land and the aft section will be by sea. I also noticed the sections aren't as complete like the QE2 (i.e. internal plumbing and maybe electrical). This construction method is confusing to me. So, what is the point of following the QE2 modular construction method in the first place?
 

jimmyjames30x30

Junior Member
Registered Member
If I understood this correctly, the forward half was transported via land and the aft section will be by sea. I also noticed the sections aren't as complete like the QE2 (i.e. internal plumbing and maybe electrical). This construction method is confusing to me. So, what is the point of following the QE2 modular construction method in the first place?

I think it has to do with space. The drydock where the parts are to be assembled have been enlarged from its original size. This took a lot of space from the yard right next to the drydock, which means that there are not enough yard space to fabricate the parts. That's why they have to be fabricated elsewhere, and then moved to the drydock.
 

lcloo

Captain
If I understood this correctly, the forward half was transported via land and the aft section will be by sea. I also noticed the sections aren't as complete like the QE2 (i.e. internal plumbing and maybe electrical). This construction method is confusing to me. So, what is the point of following the QE2 modular construction method in the first place?
You are right. They are not following the QE method of construction, just their own way of construction that some observers using the QE as comparison. May look like similar but not the same.
 
Top