Chinese air to air missiles

silentlurker

Junior Member
Registered Member
I mean, the ramjet and air scoop itself takes a certain amount of space as well, look at how big (width-wise) the scoop is on the Meteor for example. Not a issue for external hardpoints but might cause problems in an internal bay where the missiles are right next to each other unstaggered.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
The PL21 is surely too big for internal carriage?

The PL15 has impressive performance, but I think a ramjet missile would allow similar if not superior performance in the same sized missile, if not smaller. And smaller is what you want for internal carriage.

Tradeoff with ramjet is that it has worse maneuverability at the terminal phase of interception.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
I mean, the ramjet and air scoop itself takes a certain amount of space as well, look at how big (width-wise) the scoop is on the Meteor for example. Not a issue for external hardpoints but might cause problems in an internal bay where the missiles are right next to each other unstaggered.
AAM ramjet inlets usually sit under the missile body, so should pose no issues for internal carriage since it’s width, and not depth that is the main limiting factor for the J20.
 
Last edited:

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Tradeoff with ramjet is that it has worse maneuverability at the terminal phase of interception.
Isn’t it the other way around?

Ramjet should have greater range if the body of the missile and fuel mix are the same. As such, it should be fully powered for a longer part of the flight envelope, which should give it better chance of having better manoeuvrability in the terminal phase, owing to being still powered, than even the PL15’s dual pulse motor, as if the second stage runs out of propellant, it’s still going to be going off inertia only.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
Isn’t it the other way around?

Ramjet should have greater range if the body of the missile and fuel mix are the same. As such, it should be fully powered for a longer part of the flight envelope, which should give it better chance of having better manoeuvrability in the terminal phase, owing to being still powered, than even the PL15’s dual pulse motor, as if the second stage runs out of propellant, it’s still going to be going off inertia only.
Your instantaneous impulse, especially at higher angular changes, is much lower for a ramjet missile than a rocket. That matters a lot for the terminal phase.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Your instantaneous impulse, especially at higher angular changes, is much lower for a ramjet missile than a rocket. That matters a lot for the terminal phase.

True, but I think the underlying assumes are key here. You are assuming both to be powered in the terminal phase, while I am considering scenarios where the ramjet is still powered but the rocket has run out of propellant.

Modern counter AAM tactics is usually a game a attrition and range, where fighters try to bleed incoming missiles of all their propellant and energy before the missile can get close enough to engage, rather than super-manoeuvrability last minute extreme G jinx’s. As such, I value longer range over raw turning ability. Because even with the ramjet’s inferior terminal agility, it’s probably still far more than what fighters could hope to reliably shake off if it gets within range.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
True, but I think the underlying assumes are key here. You are assuming both to be powered in the terminal phase, while I am considering scenarios where the ramjet is still powered but the rocket has run out of propellant.

Modern counter AAM tactics is usually a game a attrition and range, where fighters try to bleed incoming missiles of all their propellant and energy before the missile can get close enough to engage, rather than super-manoeuvrability last minute extreme G jinx’s. As such, I value longer range over raw turning ability. Because even with the ramjet’s inferior terminal agility, it’s probably still far more than what fighters could hope to reliably shake off if it gets within range.

Dual pulse or multi-pulse motors.

PL-15 is known to be dual pulse, I suspect this new missile would be at least the same.


That said I imagine it's not a clear cut decision, and ramjet vs dual/multi pulse motor has been debated ad nauseum as well over the years. Benefits of ramjet (sustained energy) but its disadvantage of parasitic drag and size are known.
 

silentlurker

Junior Member
Registered Member
Your instantaneous impulse, especially at higher angular changes, is much lower for a ramjet missile than a rocket. That matters a lot for the terminal phase.
??? Impulse is the integral of force over time, how can aything have instantaneous impulse?
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
But the question is, is it a true new missile or - and at least IMO those in that model looks so - a variant of the PL-15 with folding wings?

It looks like there are more differences than just folding fins.

Red: rear fin geometry (folding?)
Yellow: two different protrusions (forward and behind mid fins) not on PL-15. (?datalink or guidance related addition?)
Green: different mid fin geometry and placement.
plx 1.jpgplx 2.jpg
 
Top