China's transport, tanker & heavy lift aircraft

The Observer

Junior Member
Registered Member
Just curious, but I want to know if there's any info on how the PLAAF decided its requirement that results in Y-20. Its payload is great compared to previous Chinese heavy transport, but considering now PLA wants it to carry 2 ZTQ-15 in one go it's reported 66 tons max payload with WS-20 suddenly looks rather lacking since it barely covers the combined weight of the two tanks. IMO such low margin is pretty disconcerting as future tank upgrades might just bring the combined weight over the max payload, reducing it's carrying capacity to only 1 tank.

That's why I'm curious. Was PLAAF forced to compromise in their requirement due to the chronic lack of higher thrust indigenous turbofan to power the transport? Or when the Y-20's design was frozen the requirement for it to carry 2 light tanks hasn't come up yet?
 
Just curious, but I want to know if there's any info on how the PLAAF decided its requirement that results in Y-20. Its payload is great compared to previous Chinese heavy transport, but considering now PLA wants it to carry 2 ZTQ-15 in one go it's reported 66 tons max payload with WS-20 suddenly looks rather lacking since it barely covers the combined weight of the two tanks. IMO such low margin is pretty disconcerting as future tank upgrades might just bring the combined weight over the max payload, reducing it's carrying capacity to only 1 tank.

That's why I'm curious. Was PLAAF forced to compromise in their requirement due to the chronic lack of higher thrust indigenous turbofan to power the transport? Or when the Y-20's design was frozen the requirement for it to carry 2 light tanks hasn't come up yet?

66 tons is quoted with D-30 engine. The payload capacity should increase when higher thrust WS-20 becomes available.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Instead of the probe-and-drogue as illustrated
View attachment 61097
The ventral white "tube" on Y-20U
View attachment 61099
Could be the flying boom for the in-flight refueling of J-20 (and later H-20)
View attachment 61098
Ahem
B92688B7-9E83-46BB-84BC-3FADD3601552.pngAs you can see here no boom. She is probe. The PLAAF is a no boomer fleet to date it makes logical sense that if you don’t have a large fleet to tankers to standardize as many of you aircraft to tank with those you have. Having three drogue lines means tanking at max three birds at once.
I don’t doubt that the Chinese are flirting with booms but I suspect that that would be more for potential export. Probe and drogue can be and has been used on bombers, fighters, transports, and helicopters it’s the most universally available type of tanker. Now yes boom fuels faster but given the tanker numbers need and the established systems.
 

xyqq

Junior Member
Registered Member
Ahem
View attachment 61100As you can see here no boom. She is probe. The PLAAF is a no boomer fleet to date it makes logical sense that if you don’t have a large fleet to tankers to standardize as many of you aircraft to tank with those you have. Having three drogue lines means tanking at max three birds at once.
I don’t doubt that the Chinese are flirting with booms but I suspect that that would be more for potential export. Probe and drogue can be and has been used on bombers, fighters, transports, and helicopters it’s the most universally available type of tanker. Now yes boom fuels faster but given the tanker numbers need and the established systems.
PLAA has been quite serious about putting a boom system on Y-20:
Y-20U-model.jpg
It suites a relatively large plane, which can experience tremendous difficulty in catching a floating "basket". That is probably why there is only one KJ-500 with an experimental probe installed.
KJ-500-probe.jpg
 
Last edited:

defenceman

Junior Member
Registered Member
50007269636_008a2ad6a1_h.jpg

50006740173_d1dc170e96_k.jpg

50007268936_a44ba97fda_h.jpg

50007267456_eac9a99d68_k.jpg

50007525852_d652cef2d2_h.jpg
Hi what 01 stand for on the cockpit though the numbers on the tail are different
if possible to answer
thank you
 

xyqq

Junior Member
Registered Member
Ahem
View attachment 61100As you can see here no boom. She is probe. The PLAAF is a no boomer fleet to date it makes logical sense that if you don’t have a large fleet to tankers to standardize as many of you aircraft to tank with those you have. Having three drogue lines means tanking at max three birds at once.
I don’t doubt that the Chinese are flirting with booms but I suspect that that would be more for potential export. Probe and drogue can be and has been used on bombers, fighters, transports, and helicopters it’s the most universally available type of tanker. Now yes boom fuels faster but given the tanker numbers need and the established systems.
As for J-20's probe, the picture of #2015 prototype was probably photoshopped, as compared with F-35C's:
F-35-probe.jpg
The only "official" image so far was from CCTV but pixilated:
J-20-probe.jpeg
It is possible that later versions of J-20 may switch to boom receptacles (or even with both probe and receptacle for flexibility): quicker refueling is safer for both the huge tanker and the stealthy fighter.
Also, Y-20U may use a boom-drogue combination for those with only probes, just like the F-14 below (easier to catch and faster refueling):
boom-drogue-f14.jpg
 
Top