. I'd love them to try invading the parliament there. I genuinely wonder how the UK will react to that.
Lol, those BNOers are dumb enough to still not realise that they've been sold a lemon by Boris.HK BNOs wrote a letter to the UK Home Secretary over repressive anti-protest laws
Hongkongers in Britain have called on Suella Braverman to reconsider controversial measures in her public order bill, which they likened to the repressive measures used to crack down on democratic opposition in their home city.
In a letter to the UK home secretary, aspects of the bill were described as “repressive measures that threaten to paralyse entire social movement” and posed a threat to their right to protest in Britain, including against Chinese communist repression in Hong Kong.
“Many of us are, or represent and work with, Hongkongers who have recently arrived in the UK in the hopes of a better life for ourselves and our loved ones – where we can exercise our rights and freedoms without fear,” says the letter, sent on behalf of groups and communities comprising Hongkongers and east and south-east Asian people.
“In effect, SDPOs appear to be a kind of open-air prison for people simply seeking to exercise their rights,” they claimed, referring to the new civil orders that threaten to ban named individuals – including those who have never committed a crime – from protesting. It would also subject them to curfew conditions, restrict them from using the internet in certain ways and even require them to submit to GPS tagging.
The letter was sent by Democracy for Hong Kong, a group behind protests that have drawn thousands of people in Britain, including activists at the centre of opposition activism in Hong Kong.
Optics, that's all about. The Biden admin needs to be seen as tough and doing something against the evil Chinese and Russian.How can it be a warning shot, when everyone is laughing too hard?
Or those in China without a sense of humour, just ignore this completely, and gets back to work.
The first ban, meant that the US was unreliable. That was good enough.
They would have moved on by now.
Incidentally, there was a story a couple days ago, posted in this forum I believe, describing how a Chinese research institute, that was banned from buying Intel chips and Nvidia chips, were still buying them, 20 years later after being originally banned.
Seems to me this new ban against Huawei will be focused on 14nm chips. While Huawei rumoured supplier, SMIC, already can fab a 7nm chip.
Huawei and Russia are competing Who among them have the largest sanction...lolNo ...
Does this mean ...
Does this mean there is another Huawei ban?!?
Like, WTF?!
There is one word to describe the Anglo American attempts to forestall Chinese tech self sufficiency/advancement: Impotent.
How can it be a warning shot, when everyone is laughing too hard?
Or those in China without a sense of humour, just ignore this completely, and gets back to work.
The first ban, meant that the US was unreliable. That was good enough.
They would have moved on by now.
Incidentally, there was a story a couple days ago, posted in this forum I believe, describing how a Chinese research institute, that was banned from buying Intel chips and Nvidia chips, were still buying them, 20 years later after being originally banned.
Seems to me this new ban against Huawei will be focused on 14nm chips. While Huawei rumoured supplier, SMIC, already can fab a 7nm chip.