Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
The Anglos are cowards, which makes sense since they are also poor fighters.
They can't hack giving the clear, honest truth despite touting themselves as being like the Spartan and ascetic Romans; rather, they are relay mouthed cowards who'll stab you in the back if they think they can get away with it and congratulate themselves on realpolitik and how machiavellian they were.
Basically, they're like the current residents of the subcontinent, their indo-european cousins.
They can't hack giving the clear, honest truth despite touting themselves as being like the Spartan and ascetic Romans; rather, they are relay mouthed cowards who'll stab you in the back if they think they can get away with it and congratulate themselves on realpolitik and how machiavellian they were.
Basically, they're like the current residents of the subcontinent, their indo-european cousins.
Last edited:
solarz
Brigadier
What the hell was that trash?
Hmmm, if they took out China and put in USA, then you have a more accurate picture
huhh? It is a paywalled article
TOKYO -- The Chinese Communist Party has unintentionally revealed weaknesses of the country's military.
One indication came with the building of facilities for launching new intercontinental ballistic missiles in an inland desert region. The other was a series of further attempts to increase childbirths, including measures to help reduce the costly burden of educating children. Behind these moves lurks evidence that the country is addressing concerns regarding troop morale and the military's ability to fight a sustained war.
For nearly a decade, China has been busy in the South China Sea, first building artificial islands, then deploying radar equipment and missiles to deter foreign military aircraft and vessels from approaching the area, and finally deploying strategic nuclear submarines capable of launching ballistic missiles in the now-protected sea.
Submarine-launched ballistic missiles, known as SLBMs, are the ultimate weapon. They allow nations to avoid being put in disadvantageous positions since the subs that carry them can remain in deep waters, keeping the enemy at bay, until the very end.
So why is China rushing to build new ICBM bases in inland desert areas? Experts believe the reason lies in the fact that although China has militarized some waters in the South China Sea and deployed SLBMs, it no longer has confidence it can defend the area should conflict arise.
In January 2018, a Chinese submarine humiliatingly revealed its lack of high-level performance. The submarine, traveling undersea in a contiguous zone of Japan's Senkaku Islands, in the East China Sea, was quickly detected by the Japanese Self-Defense Forces.
It was quick to surface and unhesitatingly raise the Chinese flag, which might as well have been a white flag of surrender; the crew presumably feared their vessel could be attacked with depth charges.
Under international law, the Maritime Self-Defense Force could have regarded the vessel as an "unidentified submarine" that had intruded into Japanese territorial waters while submerged.
Many Japanese and U.S. officials believe the incident symbolizes the low morale of Chinese troops.
A Chinese submarine raises what might as well be a flag of surrender after being forced to surface near Japan's Senkaku Islands in January 2018. (Photo provided by the Ministry of Defense)
Chinese Communist Party governments have spent the past quarter-century increasing military spending and staging military parades and naval reviews. But visible might like missiles and tanks is only one component of military power. There are also invisible inputs, like troop morale.
The Chinese navy has been working on an aircraft carrier program, but a former Japanese Ministry of Defense official predicts Chinese aircraft carriers will not leave their military ports in conflicts out of fear they might be attacked and sunk.
Some believe that Chinese soldiers' low morale is attributable to the country's long-standing one-child policy, which has made the military one of the world's leading "one-child armies."
"Over 70% of Chinese soldiers are 'only children,' and the rest are the second or later children whose parents had to pay fines to bear them," said Kinichi Nishimura, a former Ground Self-Defense Force officer who for many years has analyzed East Asia's military balance at the Ministry of Defense's Defense Intelligence Headquarters and elsewhere.
The Confucianist view that children must respect and take good care of their parents and ancestors remains deep-rooted in China. As a result, parents are particularly reluctant to see their children die earlier than they do. Parents of one-child households must feel even more strongly about their only son or daughter becoming nothing more than a proverbial "nail."
In China, where people tend to have little respect for soldiers, there is a saying: "Good steel does not become nails," meaning respectable individuals do not become soldiers. In order to ensure it can secure sufficient numbers of troops, the party has been working to improve salaries and pensions.
On Aug. 1, the government enacted a law to protect the status, rights and interests of military personnel. This desperate effort to improve the patina of a military career might be a sign that the People's Liberation Army has not been able to turn around its recruitment efforts, especially in the face of the country's ebbing fertility rate.
"The Chinese military has increased the deployment of battleships and fighter planes since a few years ago," Nishimura said, "but their operating rates are not exactly high. It seems they are unable to sufficiently train enough soldiers to properly maintain and repair" the high-tech hardware.
This is partly why the Chinese military in recent years has come to rely more on unmanned aircraft and ballistic missiles. The number of ballistic missiles China deploys has increased to several thousand.
One of the PLA's military doctrines not widely known, says, "In the initial battle of war, launch a large number of missiles and then immediately leave the front line." This strategy was picked up from the former Soviet Union, whose military played the role of teacher while China was forming the PLA.
Over the past few years, the PLA has rushed to add more fighter jets, surface ships and submarines, which might indicate an intention to increase the number of missiles that can be launched when battles commence. Unmanned aircraft are thought to have the same purpose. This strategy will continue, especially when the military is not able to secure enough soldiers.
To protect themselves from Chinese missile attacks, Japan and other nations must start thinking about enhancing measures to mitigate damage. These measures include developing and deploying next-generation arms, including high-energy laser weapons and rail guns, which use electromagnetic force to launch projectiles at extremely high speeds. Japan already has a technological foundation to develop these weapons, though this capacity is not widely known in the country.
End of the full article.
It honestly reads like it was written by a Jai Hind Indian. I wasn't aware that a Japanese person can be this ignorant, stupid, intellectually midget and lazy, not to mention writing an article riddled with nothing but Chinese bad stereotypes.
Take the supposedly dwindling population of China, did I just really read this shit coming from a Japanese person, coming from a country with a severe declining birth rate and decline in population? A country that has lost it's martial prowess since it was c..old by America since the end of WWII after getting nuked twice. I mean, when was the last time the JSDF been deployed overseas to fight in a war?
I hope that Japanese intellectuals keep writing such excellent take on China's military so that when the opposite happens from what they thought would be the outcome I want to see, hear the collective shock from their arrogant faces.
Call it desperate. But it seems the the Anti-China crowd are turning "Jai Hind" every passing day.
Lol I know right? I had to literally triple check the author's name/bio of the article because the more I read the more I found the content to be a comedy, and oddly enough highly entertaining because it does read like the article was written by an Indian nationalist.
I'm puzzled that a japanese person wrote this; you'd think an Asian person accustomed to Asian culture and Confucian ethics would be familiar with patriotism and duty to the country, society and family. Why wouldn't a Chinese patriot fight for China?
Why wouldn't the Chinese of the 1930s fight for China even as the world was collapsing around them and China was on the ropes?
The Meiji restoration has destroyed the asian nature of japanese culture, leaving only an asian facade behind a wannabe white western face.