Breaking & World News! III NO DISCUSSION!!


FairAndUnbiased

Junior Member
Registered Member
BS. Woodward is trying to sell his book again. The chair of JCS tells General Li ZuoCheng that the US is not going to attack China without advanced notice; "its not going to be a surprise", the chairman said.

Then it says General Li Zuocheng took the chairman at his word. Does anybody actually believe this in this BS.
General Li took him at his word because all the other sources probably already told him the same thing days ago.
 

Bob Smith

Junior Member
Registered Member
Ehh, I believe him. No reason for Trump to initiate military action against China.
He blames China for losing him the election due to Covid. He could've poked China to give Biden a harder time and get Americans to hate China even more than they do.

You have to look at Trump through the lens of a toddler who would set the world on fire to satiate his spite.
 

solarz

Brigadier
He blames China for losing him the election due to Covid. He could've poked China to give Biden a harder time and get Americans to hate China even more than they do.

You have to look at Trump through the lens of a toddler who would set the world on fire to satiate his spite.

Not really, Trump is a sociopath, not a psychopath. He's devoid of empathy and completely egotistic, possibly narcissistic, but sociopaths are in fact often extremely rational and utilitarian.
 

DarkStar

Junior Member
Registered Member
Trump may not have wanted a war with China, but he tacitly allowed the appointment of people who did, people like Navarro, Pompeo et al. I am inclined to believe that the natsec faction manipulated and fawned and flattered Trump into allowing these appointments- Trump after all was fighting a cold civil war against the Establishment Democrats and hence would have favoured loyalty over ability- which is how someone like Pompeo became SECSTATE.
 

ansy1968

Major
Registered Member
Trump may not have wanted a war with China, but he tacitly allowed the appointment of people who did, people like Navarro, Pompeo et al. I am inclined to believe that the natsec faction manipulated and fawned and flattered Trump into allowing these appointments- Trump after all was fighting a cold civil war against the Establishment Democrats and hence would have favoured loyalty over ability- which is how someone like Pompeo became SECSTATE.
@DarkStar bro it show the power of the deep state, the apparatus that Bush Jr and the Neocon had establish, whichever President a Democrat nor a Republican is just a figurehead cause the policy is driven by these people. I had a video here about the Franco German war of 1870 and see the eerily similarity of present day US elites and that of France in 1870, how they manipulate their way into war, their Hubris exemplify and their demonization in its justification.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

45K views2 months ago

CC
 
Last edited:

Overbom

Junior Member
Registered Member
@DarkStar bro it show the power of the deep state, the apparatus that Bush Jr and the Neocon had establish, whichever President a Democrat nor a Republican is just a figurehead cause the policy is driven by these people. I had a video here about the Franco German war of 1870 and see the eerily similarity of present day US elites and that of France in 1870, how they manipulate their way into war, their Hubris exemplify and their demonization in its justification.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

45K views2 months ago

CC
Interests are eternal, bypassing the useless 4yr elections.

For example, would industrialists not lobby for cheap energy imports, cheap raw materials, open foreign markets etc?

Wouldn't Internet tech companies not lobby for a unified world standard for Internet with minimal state intervention.?

And a last one, wouldnt China want to have land access to its energy and other essential imports?

Even if 1000 years passed,these interests would still remain. Financial, security, develipment, diplomatic interests are eternal
 

Top