I find this statement unusual to say the least, and question its veracity, please post a link authenticating this statement. That is a rather bizarre proposition, to carry an external load that prohibits full control movement is simply not SOP? its just not, so please verify this statement with a credible link or withdraw it? Thanks Brat
Looks like Bro Kwai has already addressed this error of the Bro? Ashbringer, I can state with absolute certainty that is a "krock", simply NOT true, and rather than discuss your statement, it should be corrected by you sir. There are a lot of unreliable posts on the internet, whoever proposed such non-sense is def not a reliable source.
Thanks bro, I admit that I should be more cautious when I claimed my first statement about flaps, I read the issue on a website which I thought was usually reliable, and I directly believe it, I'd like to apologize for the situation it caused, it is my fault.
Like I said before, I am not a pilot or engineer in relative divisions, so I usually learn these military information from from websites, and I tried to choose the most trustworthy information, but from the pictures and analysis you guys replied me, I think the flaps' issue maybe not true, I mean from those pictures the distance between flaps and missiles seems long enough, and yes like you said, it is hard to believe that a multifunctional fighter will have such issue. I will see if I can contact the editor of my picture, and ask him about his conclusion. I do not want to stir up dispute, I just want to know how he get his conclusion.
Again, I apologize for my hasty statement.