Sino-India conflict
- Thread starter President
- Start date
- Status
Indianfighter said:
Ahhh. Okay, I had also neglected the strategtic importance in PRC's control of the "headwaters" of major rivers in South Asia. My bad.
The IT export figure dispute has more to do with different defination of "Information Technology". Some have very narrow defination, others more broad. Generally speaking people who use a broader defination of IT use "ICT" (Information and Communications Technology). You can read about China's ICT export figures here:
But if you narrowly define IT exports to, say, software and IT services, then India is way ahead of China.
Hopefully that clears up the confusion and we can all just drop the subject.
FreeAsia2000
Junior Member
Indianfighter said:
Hi
IndianFighter it's ok we all make mistakes from time to time. Important
thing is to admit we're wrong and the take it from there.
However your second paragraph is going to be a bit difficult to do since
the Dalai Lama isn't asking for independence in Tibet anymore
mindreader
New Member
Isn't it rather interesting to come to a Chinese defence forum, the mission statement of which is:
"Since its launch in 2002, Chinese Defence Today (SinoDefence.com) has been aiming to provide the readers with the most comprehensive information and data on the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), including its conventional weapon systems, weapon of mass destruction (WMD), space programme, C4ISR (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance), and organisational structures."
and claim that:
"PRC and its members DO NOT interest me"
especially when it comes to a subject involving Chinese territory. I suppose Indianfighter just, by his own admission, confirmed that he is a troll. But then again, we knew that all along didn't we?
In light of this, I think it is clear that anything Indianfighter has to say should be treated as nothing more than rubbish. Once again, that isn't really surprising either, considering that nothing he had to say ever held any water.
"Since its launch in 2002, Chinese Defence Today (SinoDefence.com) has been aiming to provide the readers with the most comprehensive information and data on the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), including its conventional weapon systems, weapon of mass destruction (WMD), space programme, C4ISR (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance), and organisational structures."
and claim that:
"PRC and its members DO NOT interest me"
especially when it comes to a subject involving Chinese territory. I suppose Indianfighter just, by his own admission, confirmed that he is a troll. But then again, we knew that all along didn't we?
In light of this, I think it is clear that anything Indianfighter has to say should be treated as nothing more than rubbish. Once again, that isn't really surprising either, considering that nothing he had to say ever held any water.
Now this ridicilous personal clashes of certain members ends now!! This is militaryforum and you don't bring your personal difference to here. I've wathced too many Indian related topic going to thrasscan and i think here we go again. Take this warning seriously becouse if i notice one more rulebreaking, everyone, I mean everyone participating that misconduct will get a officical warning and to some that would be the last...
So don't be a troll, nor fish...if someone is agitating, don't fall for it and if someone is behaiving badly, report it to me or some other moderator and not go and toss some more fuel to the flames
So don't be a troll, nor fish...if someone is agitating, don't fall for it and if someone is behaiving badly, report it to me or some other moderator and not go and toss some more fuel to the flames
mindreader
New Member
Sigh... there are always forums that sacrifice objectivity for the sake of harmony.
I can sure you that we wont aim harmony and consensus, but proffesionalism and cutting out all imaturity. All those who trespas these ideas will pay the prize, so don't worry if you wont see any imidiate results, we mods often work undercover.
Indianfighter
Junior Member
I meant that the CPC and its members do not interest me. When CDF was in Ezboard, I had devoted an entire thread criticizing the CPC and its brutal and ruthless policies.Old members may remember that thread (it was lost after a server malfunction).
I disapprove of the CPC and its founding father, Mao, who backstabbed India on the Panchsheel treaty, that led to the 1962 war. It can be imagined that if Mao had not usurped Tibet illegally, then today Tibet would have been an independent nation, and relations between India and China would have been much better than they are today.
I disapprove of the CPC and its founding father, Mao, who backstabbed India on the Panchsheel treaty, that led to the 1962 war. It can be imagined that if Mao had not usurped Tibet illegally, then today Tibet would have been an independent nation, and relations between India and China would have been much better than they are today.
Last edited:
- Status