Shenyang FC-31 / J-31 Fighter Demonstrator

Discussion in 'Air Force' started by RedSky, Aug 21, 2011.

  1. Air Force Brat
    Offline

    Air Force Brat Brigadier

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    8,818
    Likes Received:
    10,294
    Actually I believe the design teams acknowledged that the YF-23 was not only a lower RCS design, but faster as well, however the YF-22 had larger weapons bays, (and actually launched weapons, though not a requirement), the YF-22 also employed OVT which along with the conventional layout, drove maneuverability way up.

    While not the only factors, LockMart was ready to roll on the YF-22, while the YF-23 would have required more work, had smaller bays, etc, etc.
     
    Tirdent likes this.
  2. Air Force Brat
    Offline

    Air Force Brat Brigadier

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    8,818
    Likes Received:
    10,294
    The YF-23 and the YF-22 were both proto-types...
     
  3. longmarch
    Offline

    longmarch Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    491
    I'm nobody too but J-31 is just a twin-engined 35, with underpowered engines. That's what it is. The big difference between v1 and v2 shows that the designers didn't spend enough time study the what and how. There is a need for a cheaper and medium sized option to counter the proliferation of stealth fighters. Regional power also have this need. For example when Singapore gets its hands on F-35, Malaysia would want to have something to counter it. Or when India has its stealth aircraft, Parkistan would want to have something. But these needs are not urgent ones and 601 can take their time to tinker and figure out what they are doing, while waiting for an advanced engine.

    I'm more interested in carrier based version. I hope it'll be a heavy, long range one, not something based on J-31.
     
    Air Force Brat likes this.
  4. Air Force Brat
    Offline

    Air Force Brat Brigadier

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    8,818
    Likes Received:
    10,294
    Actually the FC-31 went through similar changes to the J-20 in clipping the tips etc from the prototype.. I understand your desire for a heavy fighter to fly off the carriers, but lets not throw the baby out with the bath water, the FC-31 is a very fine airplane. What SAC eventually does with it? depends on demand by the military, and you're right, there are no doubt foreign customers for such an airplane.
     
    defenceman and Attenburger like this.
  5. Deino
    Offline

    Deino Brigadier
    Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    9,916
    Likes Received:
    25,786
    I really don't understand all this lamenting! :mad::(

    IMO the FC-31 is a great concept and all it lacks is a decent modern engine and - and here the rumours are quite varying - a hard confirmation from the PLA. But hey, maybe there is already one and they only do not want to unveil their true intentions ...
     
    Air Force Brat likes this.
  6. ZeEa5KPul
    Offline

    ZeEa5KPul Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    746
    Why do people say this, the WS-19 has been all but confirmed (we even have a picture of it). It's not ready now, but neither is the plane.
     
    Biscuits likes this.
  7. Deino
    Offline

    Deino Brigadier
    Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    9,916
    Likes Received:
    25,786
    But that's exactly the reason, why peoples are so impatient and think it is a bad design. Yes, the RD-93 is in no way an option to enter service in the same way as an interim the PLAAF adopted with the AL-31FN and now WS-10C for the J-20 but when the WS-19 is done, it could be a great fighter.
     
    Attenburger, by78 and Air Force Brat like this.
  8. Biscuits
    Offline

    Biscuits Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2018
    Messages:
    666
    Likes Received:
    925
    Honestly since China already has a top class small engine, it would be a waste not to make J-31 a reality. Otherwise, the WS-19 will be limited to drones only.

    Biggest issue is whether J-31 would overlap too much with J-20.

    Once finished, the J-31 will also be an a2a close range focused fighter with strong BVR options, aka no different to J-20, except being smaller and slightly less expensive.

    To prevent overlap, China could try to make one of them into a strike focused stealth fighter while the other retains air superiority/high end interceptor roles.
     
    Attenburger, ZeEa5KPul and Deino like this.
  9. taxiya
    Offline

    taxiya Major
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2006
    Messages:
    3,717
    Likes Received:
    8,187
    It would be an even bigger waste of resources just to make use a good engine IF PLA does not need a mid or small sized aircraft.

    At the end, the question remains, what does PLA need FC-31 for? I am not speaking for PLA, but just want to remind us not to forget that the very reason of FC-31 in PLA is not its engine, but PLA's need.

    It is akin to daily life, you find a very nice cloth at good price but not your size, buying and wearing it would be a waste even if it is cheap.
     
    by78 likes this.
  10. defenceman
    Offline

    defenceman Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2014
    Messages:
    144
    Likes Received:
    75
    Hi isn’t it possible that in near future j31 can take off from a catapult ACC this way both the organisations have time
    To develop catapult & a decent engine for J31 as I’m sure with at least 4-6 ACC China will be looking for a stealth
    Plane on these future ACCs
    So I think we can revisit J31 development around say another 3-4 years time period or may be less
    Thank you
     

Share This Page