Shenyang FC-31 / J-31 Fighter Demonstrator

Discussion in 'Air Force' started by RedSky, Aug 21, 2011.

  1. maxx
    Offline

    maxx New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2009
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    The bend just seems too great for a low viscosity fluid like air when you consider the flow speed. Could be just me :confused:
     
  2. delft
    Offline

    delft Brigadier

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    6,750
    We don't know it. Somebody told us. We'll wait and perhaps see.
     
  3. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,532
    Likes Received:
    16,342
    We're told all of those things you said, and it's sounding similar like how people all believed J-XX was a canard delta that was being funded by the PLAAF.
    It's not impossible for SAC to be funding this project "themselves" -- they might have some people in the government and PLAAF funding going to it as R&D but the sound of things suggest this project is one which the PLAAF has no interest in as of yet.
     
  4. AssassinsMace
    Offline

    AssassinsMace Brigadier

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Messages:
    7,894
    Likes Received:
    9,427
    Well anything less than something new, SAC fails getting its biggest monkey off its back. I like the "legion of losers" label. Sounds like a movie plot.
     
  5. airsuperiority
    Offline

    airsuperiority Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,041
    Likes Received:
    85

    For some reason, I'd think here at SDF, we can come up with a more original design that actually works than what SAC does..
     
  6. siegecrossbow
    Online

    siegecrossbow Brigadier
    Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    6,120
    Likes Received:
    8,670
    Looks like a T-50 with its belly flattened out...

    Did they really have to imitate the paintwork... really?
     
  7. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,532
    Likes Received:
    16,342
    As hyperwarp showed and as I said before, these were drawings of the t-50 before it first flew, so it's not sac's 5th gen. The resemblance to t-50 is because it IS the t-50 :p
     
  8. Schumacher
    Offline

    Schumacher Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    189
    Why would there be overlap ? J20 is air superiority, SAC's J-XX is multi-role.
    JH-7B may have some stealth but if it's still derived from the old strike JH-7, then it should be somewhere, in terms of generation, between, J20, SAC-JXX and the J16/J11BHS which don't seem to have any stealth and derived from a heavy fighter.
    So there are obvious differences in roles/capabilities of these jets.

    If you look at USAF which have F22, if they can fix it, F35, F15E, F16s/15s/18s coexisting, PLAAF with J20, J-XX, JH7-B, J10B, J16/J11BHS, J15 is not too much at all especially considering PLAAF don't share USAF's enthusiasm for common services platform like F35.
     
  9. latenlazy
    Online

    latenlazy Colonel

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,288
    Likes Received:
    3,482
    Technically all modern day fighters are "multirole" to some extent or another. In the case of the J-20, multirole capabilities probably lean more towards air superiority, interdictor/interceptor, and tactical strike, leaving an opening for a more general strike/attack/fighter-bomber plane. The question is with a plane like the J-20, will they be better off with a generalist (J-16, 19 etc) or would they be better off with something a bit more specialized in the other way, like a JH-7B.

    The reason why this is significant is because running multiple platforms is expensive in terms of maintenance and supply. You only have a situation like the US because 1) You have two separate branches of the military with different requirements in their planes (The F-35 is a good example of how even with different branch requirements the costs are a problem), and 2) you're watching an air force in transition and phasing out legacy fighters. This is vastly different than a discussion about introducing both a J-16/19 and a JH-7B, where both are newly being introduced at the same time, guaranteeing twice the maintenance burden for half the number of each plane type. Unless there is a significant advantage to having both (for example, one being specialized for carriers), it seems unlikely from a logistics and operations point of view.

    The PLAAF may not have an enthusiasm for common service platforms, but keep in mind the USAF and USN didn't either, and had to be strongarmed by the ballooning costs of increasingly advanced air frames.
     
  10. clone7803
    Offline

    clone7803 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    PLAAF is the boss,I don't buy the rumor that the SAC tried to collect the R&D money by its own connection in the AVIC since if the boss won't buy its product,it's useless to spend money and energy on such a project.And on the contrary,I believe that the SAC J-XX project has a high priority in the PLAAF's future plan if it's not more important than the J-20 due to the reasons:
    1.The PLAAF intended to buid a both defensive and offensive force(by recent PLAAF publictions),the SAC J-XX fighter/bomber will be the backbone to project the air to ground firepower in an offensive mission.
    2.If the SAC J-XX is cheaper enough(at least it seems so from current leaked information) than the J-20,mostlikely the PLAAF will buy more of it than the J-20.That means the PLAAF will form a high/low combination by the J-20/SAC J-XX.
    3.I can smell the distrust from the PLAAF to the CAC.The SAC J-XX has a role to be the plan B that if the J-20 failed,the PLAAF still has another project to ensure the sucess.
    Overall,the SAC J-XX services the PLAAF's future offensive plan and it's important to the PLAAF,the SAC project could not to be a self-funded one.It's important,if not more important than the J-20.
     

Share This Page