Shenyang FC-31 / J-31 Fighter Demonstrator

Discussion in 'Air Force' started by RedSky, Aug 21, 2011.

  1. SinoSoldier
    Offline

    SinoSoldier Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,504
    Likes Received:
    3,430
    Looks like a very poorly made model, both in fidelity and workmanship.
     
  2. Deino
    Offline

    Deino Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    6,455
    Likes Received:
    13,851

    Not sure and given the hype in some forums already expecting a PLANAF version (since it carries the flag) I had a similar question, esp. on how "official" and how "new" this model is?
    As such the main question is, how reliable is this model ?

    Is it a true model made by SAC/AVIC with the PLANAF flag as a hint (for maybe a new interest in that bird?) or is it a fan-made-model with simply the PLANAF-flag patched on it?

    Even more, how recent is it ? Is it from the time, when the PLA was still interested (if it ever was?) and as such does not match the current V2-configuration or is it a recent one showing modifications esp. for a carrier-version ?

    Deino
     
  3. Franklin
    Offline

    Franklin Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,955
    Likes Received:
    1,482
    Is this still a SAC out of pocket development or is this now a government funded project ?
     
    Air Force Brat likes this.
  4. SinoSoldier
    Offline

    SinoSoldier Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,504
    Likes Received:
    3,430
    Another image of the naval model has popped up. According to online observers, previous models from SAC have been quite accurate, so the fact that this one differs from the V2.0 is confusing to many.

    Personally I think it's simply a hastily-made model (probably done by re-using an old V1.0 model); it makes absolutely no sense to go backwards in terms of design evolution. Doing such a thing neither saves time nor cost.

    648c145ejw1fcug1j4gn3j20ku0g275i.jpg
     
    defenceman and Air Force Brat like this.
  5. Deino
    Offline

    Deino Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    6,455
    Likes Received:
    13,851

    But in general it would help t know a bit more:

    how recent, how reliable is this model and where it displayed ??

    Deino
     
    Air Force Brat and Equation like this.
  6. SinoSoldier
    Offline

    SinoSoldier Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,504
    Likes Received:
    3,430
    According to fresh rumors (speculation, perhaps?), the model is an old one that was made before the V2.0 appeared.

    But does that mean the PLAN is not necessarily interested in it?
     
    Air Force Brat likes this.
  7. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,309
    Likes Received:
    10,694
    I think the model doesn't tell us anything new -- i.e.: we don't know if anyone (air force, or in this case navy) wants it or not.

    For all we know this could be the company trying to promote it to the navy, or it could be reflective of the navy showing interest in it or anything in between.


    The configuration of the model probably reflects poor model production that didn't pay enough attention to details.
     
    Equation and Air Force Brat like this.
  8. SinoSoldier
    Offline

    SinoSoldier Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,504
    Likes Received:
    3,430
    If it were any other model, we'd probably brush it off as a poorly-made one. However, people are saying that preceding models from SAC have been very accurate (recall that the v2.0 configuration was first unveiled in model form), which is the source of the confusion.

    Now there are rumors that this is merely an old (i.e. rehashed) model. The PLAN flag doesn't mean much at this point since the aircraft doesn't even have tailhooks or catapult-oriented landing gear.
     
    Equation and Air Force Brat like this.
  9. Bltizo
    Offline

    Bltizo Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,309
    Likes Received:
    10,694
    The previous models you are talking about were known to be associated with SAC.
    Do we know whether this model is associated with SAC?


    And even if it is associated with SAC, just how much information can we actually infer from it even if we used past precedent/pattern? I think there's not much to infer.
     
  10. Deino
    Offline

    Deino Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    6,455
    Likes Received:
    13,851

    Ok. .. so some sort of V1.5 :p
     

Share This Page