Russian Su-57 Aircraft Thread (PAK-FA and IAF FGFA)

Discussion in 'World Armed Forces' started by A Bar Brother, Dec 23, 2014.

  1. TerraN_EmpirE
    Offline

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    11,351
    Likes Received:
    9,702
    Had and has.
    F22 is still getting upgrades. Sadly it has suffered due to numbers and program management. On the same level as PAKFA.
    Eurofighter is still in production and it's tranche have continued to improve.
     
  2. Gloire_bb
    Offline

    Gloire_bb Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2014
    Messages:
    594
    Likes Received:
    604
    Only one particular fighter did, because it just couldn't achieve it.
    3 others remain commited.
    And? It is up to supercruising fighter to decide, if he let you see him or not, not up to you. But he still has this ability to engage/disengage at will.
    Also, age of IR sensors on fighters started in 1960s and never ended outside of the US.

    P.s.somewhat ironically, f-35 FLIR isn't tuned to see heated surfaces from maximum possible distances, because it works in a different wavelength(being primary an a2g sensor shows yet again). European ones(especially PIRATE, which is the best of them), however, do exactly that(they even see head-on subsonic fighters at very respectable ranges), yet no one has ever claimed what they've killed supersonic engagement. Of course, OLS-57 offers simillar capability.
     
    #2812 Gloire_bb, Mar 7, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2019
  3. Jura
    Offline

    Jura Lieutenant General

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    19,775
    Likes Received:
    25,623
    Brumby please
     
  4. Brumby
    Offline

    Brumby Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,755
    Likes Received:
    2,979
    Whilst the F-35 sensor fusion is much publicised, it was build on the architecture of what went into the F-22 sensor fusion. It was an integrated systems architecture with sensor antenna embedded throughout the plane in order that the VLO features are not compromised. In other words, it is not an afterthought that you have with pods. Obviously when the F-22 was put together the state of the avionics at that time was not as advanced as when the F-35 came along.

    upload_2019-3-8_19-18-19.png
    The comment about the F-22 lacking IRST is repeated so often that it deserves to be addressed. The F-22 with the most powerful radar (AN/APG-77) at that time combined with the EW suite (AN/ALR-94) was a very potent sensor combination then and today. Those F-15 drivers will testify to that. Every time they go up against an F-22 they get popped without being able to locate their presence. Incorporating IRST at that time was simply an overkill against known and future threats. At that time non-imaging IR systems weren’t really that good and radar systems were very effective. As new imaging IRST technology has emerged it became increasingly popular on fighter aircraft in recent years. Both F-22 and F-35 have all aspect IR suppression and it would be interesting in terms of how effective IRST will be against these two birds.

    When discussing IRST it is important to understand that not all IRST systems are the same and that they have similar capabilities. At the most basic level are the non-imaging uncooled IRST systems as used in MiG-29 (OLS-29). They have very poor range due to low sensitivity and can only indicate direction of some heat source. They are unable to tell the range (without laser) and cannot identify targets as they cannot create images but just detect increase in IR radiation in some direction. These systems also cannot effectively detect and track multiple targets.
    An improvement up the technology chain are non-imaging cooled IRST systems and are used in Su-27 variants including SU-35 (OLS-27 to OLS-35). These have much better sensitivity and thus longer range. Otherwise they share similar limitations as the older IR systems. Imaging, uncooled IRST systems are not used in fighter IRST systems but in missiles. They easily beat both uncooled and cooled non-imaging systems in almost every respect. They have decent range and as they are imaging, can also recognize and identify targets. They can do passive ranging and can detect/track large number of targets simultaneously. Imaging, cooled IRST systems are used in modern western IRSTs like Pirate, FSO and EOTS. These outperform all other types handily and have all the capabilities of imaging uncooled systems but offer much better sensitivity and thus better range and target discrimination abilities.

    Imaging sensors can be further divided to scanning and staring arrays. Scanning arrays have been used in earlier FLIR/IRST systems (Pirate, AN/AAAS-42, many FLIR systems) but staring arrays have really taken over during the last decade. EOTS and DAS use staring arrays as do many later targeting pods and for example DDM-NG in Rafale. Compared to scanning arrays, modern staring arrays have higher sensitivity, longer range and better reliability and higher frame rate with better image quality.

    As for the other technology gaps that you mentioned with the F-22, there are planned upgrades for the F-22 to ensure it remain the premier air to air superiority fighter. I have more confidence in the F-22 completing its upgrade before the SU-57 can complete its planned development.

    Since you referred to SU-35, let's see where it is in the avionics bus architecture.

    upload_2019-3-8_19-47-6.png

    Need I say more?

    ….so the SU-35 is better than the F-22 in avionics. Please tell me more in what ways..

    …. are you suggesting such features are lacking in the F-22/F-35? It is said that the strength of the F-35 is not in its stealth but in its sensor fusion. The autonomous feature of its sensor fusion engine is what makes it so powerfully different in terms of sensor directed operation and threat identification. Non of the sensor fusion features in Rafael and Typhoon come close in its autonomous capability. It is why the millions of line of codes are for.

    Not according to the data bus technological tree above.

    We are talking of a plane not a phone. In logic it is called a straw man argument.
     
    TerraN_EmpirE likes this.
  5. Brumby
    Offline

    Brumby Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,755
    Likes Received:
    2,979
    You mean using the Jedi mind trick?
    upload_2019-3-8_20-56-13.png
     
    TerraN_EmpirE likes this.
  6. Gloire_bb
    Offline

    Gloire_bb Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2014
    Messages:
    594
    Likes Received:
    604
    Going supersonic in the first place.
    Supercruise is capability, not an obligation.
    Lack of it, on the other hand, is a clear hinderance.

    More like unwillingness to pay for it.
    PIRATE, which is a benchmark system essentially, became operational in 2007, so tech level was clearly there.
     
    #2816 Gloire_bb, Mar 8, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2019
  7. TerraN_EmpirE
    Offline

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    11,351
    Likes Received:
    9,702
    Partially
    What would it have been needed for? The year was 1997, that was when Raptor was finalized for production.
    Russia barely had Flankers and Fulcroms the Russian airforce was a farce. The closest to a Russian stealth plane was the MiG-37 Ferret made by Testors. Hell even now they have a dozen SU57 in no shape for combat.
    The PLAAF was worse off.
    Even Europe was laxidasy with the Typhoon.
    ATF looked like a relic of the cold war. A uber weapon with no need.
    The F22 had an IRST which was in the designs a cooled non imaging type was dropped to save weight and cost. The PIRATE came on in line just as Raptor was leaving production.
    Even today there are no real stealth aircraft outside the US in operational numbers of state so yeah they took there time.
     
    Brumby likes this.
  8. Gloire_bb
    Offline

    Gloire_bb Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2014
    Messages:
    594
    Likes Received:
    604
    So, just like with side arrays and many more, USAF, fighting teeth and nails for every additional raptor, just wasn't able to afford these pieces(and, afaik, all weight&space reservations are long gone, i.e. no "wasted" capability here).

    This doesn't make dropped devices any worse.
    In the end, after several decades of denying their worth, air to air IRSTs are returning to the USAF(legion pods). Others simply adopted it earlier.
     
  9. TerraN_EmpirE
    Offline

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    11,351
    Likes Received:
    9,702
    Yet it can be added back in. And likely will before Su57 has the number to be declared operational.
    The IRST space is there as was that for the side arrays just a matter of getting them up and working.
    The Legion Pod is a refit added to 4th gens more to deal with drones and exercises against raptor and lightning than Su57.
     
  10. Gloire_bb
    Offline

    Gloire_bb Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2014
    Messages:
    594
    Likes Received:
    604
    According to conventional wisdom and experience with other planes, "reserved" spaces are eaten by other equipment almost instantly.
    I am almost sure what raptors will never get them.

    Hundreds of expensive pods. Dozens of F-15Xs and new superbugs, too.
    Everything is unwanted, just to have a look, is totally unnecessary, and anyways we can bolt it stealthily into 5th gen platforms anytime.

    But jokes aside, it's clearly seen as a useful capability. Furthermore, legion pod is very clearly being advertized as an "equalizer" solution. And i am honestly pretty interested why USAF(and not just the USN) has chosen to pursue one.
    US feels what allied numerical edge in 5th gen platforms is going to go away?
     
    #2820 Gloire_bb, Mar 8, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2019
Loading...

Share This Page