Not answer only just you attack too regurlary Russia it is not allowed by the rules named Flame Bait ...
I have my feling i prefer some countries but i don't attack others.
Calm dow a bit dude you provide interesting things useless to be agressive.
Russian Su-57 Aircraft Thread (PAK-FA and IAF FGFA)
- Thread starter A Bar Brother
- Start date
Not answer only just you attack too regurlary Russia it is not allowed by the rules named Flame Bait ...
I have my feling i prefer some countries but i don't attack others.
Calm dow a bit dude you provide interesting things useless to be agressive.
Back on topic. 6th gen isn't even defined by general unspoken consensus by airforces around the world. Perhaps this was lost in translation but maybe it's better to say instead of 6th gen, Su-57 could likely replace 5th gen RuAF fighters in future? So basically replacing itself. Maybe he means it could become what the next replacement bases itself off. In any case, rich big words from someone who hasn't even had time to become acclimated to Su-57 or tested it against other fighters from other countries.
Okay I can understand how some things I say can be viewed as attacks on Russia just like some of B787's comments can be read as attacks on China. I can provide dozens but it'll take time. I
m sure you can find many of mine as well. I think it started with me raising my suspicions of no side bays or large main bays. I provided my reasoninig, presented the idea sensitively without arrogance or certainty. Look at my posting history if you don't believe me. However, that attempt was met with strange ways of avoiding the topic like " you don't read russian so you don't know anything " etc etc etc.... it keeps going on in different ways but none really disproved my theory properly.
I am skeptical of Russian claims as much as I am skeptical of Chinese claims and members who are super hot about China's creations. I really hate that with a passion. Don't take it personally. I've nothing much against Russians or Russian government. It's okay to rubbish other country's hardware as long as reasoning and some evidence to support claims are provided. I don't think I've failed to do that.
Ok
Name one then.
It's entirely different because it is contradictory to the facts.
It's especially funny when you have a right link. They haven't teached u in the university what you have to actually look into your own sources?
I don't have time to academically research this but wikipedia is accurate enough and it shows a few engines more powerful than russian ones. I've given you the links but you haven't looked at them. I know how to research. It's what I did for 5 years studying and now what I do at work. I'm not sure what you mean by "actually look into your own sources". This sentence doesn't make sense. What exactly are "my own" sources?? I don't have secret inside info if that is what you mean. Get a stronger grasp of the english language before participating in these forums and misudnerstanding people. If you mean academically reliable sources, most of that info is pretty classified or proprietary so not much around however we can get a good idea from commercial sites and one of them proves at least one American engine being more powerful. But so what that doesn't matter. It's just you brought it up and I disproved you yet again.
Guys ... either You concentrate on the Su-57 or You simply shut up ! 
If I take a look at the J-20 discussion where again the usual suspects prefer to eyeball instead of calculating, where they avoid each and every single question with a clear answer and I again have to clean about 6 pages of BS.
Are You nuts???
It's really annoying what's recently going on here
Deino
@WebMaster PLEASE give us finally the new mods and also the power to do something.
If I take a look at the J-20 discussion where again the usual suspects prefer to eyeball instead of calculating, where they avoid each and every single question with a clear answer and I again have to clean about 6 pages of BS.
Are You nuts???
It's really annoying what's recently going on here
Deino
@WebMaster PLEASE give us finally the new mods and also the power to do something.
Last edited:
Jura The idiot
General
b787
Captain
the original Russian patent for LEVCONs
to summarize it, it says to improve post stall recovery and for supersonic drag/lift improvement basically it works as a canard.
In fact they can be used asymmetrically for roll.
to summarize it, it says to improve post stall recovery and for supersonic drag/lift improvement basically it works as a canard.
In fact they can be used asymmetrically for roll.
