Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Discussion in 'World Armed Forces' started by tphuang, Mar 24, 2006.

  1. TerraN_EmpirE
    Offline

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    12,304
    Likes Received:
    10,638
    History!! I was refering to the relationship over the past two centuries if not earlier.
     
  2. Anlsvrthng
    Offline

    Anlsvrthng Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1,204
    Likes Received:
    284
    The important bit is the capability to develop and make, the existence of huge market .Ukraine had all.

    Russia was in disadvantage, but Putin did a good job to suppress the Oligarch .

    I think it was the main reason why the Ukrainian Oligarchy doesn't wanted any strong Rus-Ukr relations.
     
  3. Bhurki
    Offline

    Bhurki Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2018
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    164
    The more i focus on the future of Russia navy, it seems like its going to become a green water navy not so far in the future...
    With the newest destroyer in service being atleast 20 years old, and other capital ships like battlecruisers being even older,
    No likely replacement remains a big issue (Lider class not finalised).
    The sub surface component is way better protected from economic constraints than the surface navy.
    It does, then seem that within about a decade, russia navy surface service will include of numerous gorshkov, steregushchiy, grigorovich class additions to itself.. However will lack any major power projection element.
     
    ougoah and TerraN_EmpirE like this.
  4. Anlsvrthng
    Offline

    Anlsvrthng Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1,204
    Likes Received:
    284
    The countries in Europe never has been homogen , so the current ukrainan/russian/polish/hungarian/romanian/belorus ect border is just a random line on the map.
     
  5. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    23,031
    Likes Received:
    27,464
  6. gelgoog
    Offline

    gelgoog Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2017
    Messages:
    1,230
    Likes Received:
    1,343
    The Russians will basically refit the Kirov-class battlecruisers with more modern weapon systems. To be honest I think the Lider-class design is kinda cumbersome and for all that mass does not even have enough VLS cells to compete with a much lower mass Ticonderoga-class cruiser or the Chinese Type 055. I think the Russians need to go back to the drawing board on that one.

    There is a huge question of what design they will use as a modern capital ship. All of these will require major investments. Russia clearly failed to modernize their naval construction yards to enable them to be competitive in this sector. I think this result was to be expected. Still it's not the end of the world. France and Italy for example use multi-role frigates for most tasks. Given modern Russian cruise missile system technology any ship they design will be a lot more combat capable than their older designs.
     
  7. Anlsvrthng
    Offline

    Anlsvrthng Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1,204
    Likes Received:
    284
    Russia just in the middle of a huge shipyard investment project(s), for LNG tankers, icebreakers and so on.

    They has the capacity to make big warships, it is more of a matter of need.
     
  8. Skywatcher
    Offline

    Skywatcher Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,744
    Likes Received:
    891
    Building a Lider class DDG to civilian standards won't be the most optimal solution.

    India and Turkey can throw together pretty decent civilian ships, but that doesn't mean that they can start coughing out an Arleigh Burke Flight III or Type 055 tomorrow.

    And with Russia having gone on a large surface combatant construction holiday for nearly two decades, most of the experience in building and designing DDGs+ is gone.
     
  9. Tirdent
    Online

    Tirdent Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2017
    Messages:
    421
    Likes Received:
    602
    The same could've been said about China or South Korea what feels like yesterday, and unlike Turkey or India the Russians DO have recent experience *designing* large warships.

    Fact of the matter is that the PLAN build-up came on the back of a large and healthy civilian yard infrastructure, so it is not clear to me why improvements to the same in Russia would not have similar benefits (if they are funded and realized). And while the Russians did go on a *construction* holiday (as you correctly said) due to ship yard problems, the design bureaus certainly kept on designing them.

    So the crux of the issue apparently lies with the yards, and that is precisely where the planned civilian investments will help (the notion that you can't build to military standards in a yard originally created for civilian purposes is risible).
     
    #6509 Tirdent, Dec 29, 2018
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2018
  10. Anlsvrthng
    Offline

    Anlsvrthng Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1,204
    Likes Received:
    284
    You mean a 33000 tons nuclear icebreaker is easier to make than a 15000 tons cruiser?
     
Loading...

Share This Page