Quality of Education in China? Overnationalism?

airsuperiority said:

Can someone remind me why I'm talking to an active racist again? Now it's not a surprise why you both reinforce each other's actions. You're just as much of a believer of racism, and it's scary you're even "proud" enough to talk about acting like that.

Click to expand...

Can someone explain to me why Chinese must be "bend over" to purvey as a peaceful group of people who won't harm others if they were attacked in anyway?

Equation: can you consolidate your response into a single post, that way, it is easier to read and decrease the number of pages.

I'd like to remind everyone to stay off personal attacks, trash opinions all you want, but refrain from saying anything more on the other posters, otherwise this thread is on a chinese high-speed railway to be closed. Thank you.

awaiting future edit;

Based on your philosophy, Israel should destroy Germany upon its creation, and all fights should end only in deaths as neither sides should yield nor stop.

lol Equation I hope you're not serious with those replies, because if you are...then your thinking's too immature to be taken for real. I'm not even gonna bother responding anymore. I've talked to smarter high school kids

airsuperiority said:

lol Equation I hope you're not serious with those replies, because if you are...then your thinking's too immature to be taken for real. I'm not even gonna bother responding

Click to expand...

But you just did that. Care to respond some more?

ahadicow said:

Equation: can you consolidate your response into a single post, that way, it is easier to read and decrease the number of pages.

I'd like to remind everyone to stay off personal attacks, trash opinions all you want, but refrain from saying anything more on the other posters, otherwise this thread is on a chinese high-speed railway to be closed. Thank you.

awaiting future edit;

Click to expand...

This thread should be closed. The fact that some members automatically thinks criticisms are a sign of China bashing shows they are psychologically incompetent to handle a rational discussion without their inferiority complex kicking in and feeling threatened. In fact, they can't even accept a difference in opinion if the opinion is a criticism. Based on all the people I've seen, only the most vulnerable would react in such a manner. They only allow good comments and treat criticisms as hostile. It's quite like someone who must hear constant praises to satisfy their own esteem, and if it isn't something which reaffirms themselves, it will be hostile. Underlying hypothesis is that either their regards of this value and esteem are so low to begin with, they feel they can't afford to lose anymore grounds to criticisms(hence inferiority complex), or they have insufficient grounds and resource of their knowledge of what they are trying to defend, so the uncertainty of what others are talking about, uncertainty of how to respond, uncertainty of how to accept these new ideas, all are easier treated as negative because they feel dissonance when the comments told to them certainly don't feel positive. By doing so, they can "zone out" the commentator as hostile so they continue to feel safe within, and without the need to change and reassure themselves still as being safe. To best demonstrate this, take the fact how those 2 members accused my comments by red herring off to the notion that

J-XX said:

For you it was all good when the westerner was doing this to Chinese people in the 19th and 20th century, but don't like it when Chinese do this to others.

Click to expand...

From this statement alone, you can see this member automatically assumed I would mean "all good when the westerner was doing this to Chinese people" when in fact I didn't even mention anything like that. That said, they never directly replied to my concern. When the later member began to respond, he instantly revealed his attitudes and insecurity

Equation said:

What J-XX is saying is to fire with fire back, nothing else. You on the other hand are way too sensible at what the so call world (Western view basically) think and see about China and Chinese without ever touching a history book. If you want to fight racism than start with the bias media..

Click to expand...

Notice the "fire with fire back", which demonstrates he doesn't seem quite understand what he does is unconstructive to the issue and will only increases the tension to the situation. "ever touching a history book" is another assumption. "start with the bias media.." means to start by directing the attention to others and not within. People with secure sense of self will have no issues reflecting inside to determine whether accusation or description is correct, THEN determine if the comment was valid or not. This is of course also a scientific approach of examining an issue. When's the last time you hear "the world hates me"? (teens with identity crisis) If we put it in another analogy where China is supposed to be an individual, others mentioning an issue could be equated to referring to a stain on the shirt or something he should improve, but then immediately these "chinese representatives" would respond in the manner of "you say that because you hate me". How does that seem? Not very mature right? But again of course he only cares about "dignity", as mentioned here:

Equation said:

That's your fault for purveying that attitude and it's my right to assume that.


I'm only suggesting defending your dignity by hitting back...

Click to expand...

I hope this shreds some insight to what you see between us in our conversation. It's rather unfortunate I have to seek their actions to illustrate my point from the earlier most, as it's definitely quite embarrassing for their part. However I do thank them for verifying all my observations, and giving me enough examples to illustrate every part of my argument.

In a sense, they may also have a very simplistic view of even their "values" in particular that they are unable to comprehend deeper beyond the most basics. It's even a question if they can see the world outside of just "black" and "white", "good" or "bad. However since there are no observations to place this hypothesis to the test, I will leave it out.