PresentDangerChina.org take on US-China relationship

Status
Not open for further replies.

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
Bannon talks about the trade deal with China as only armistice. Now here someone wants to destroy China economically why would he favors a pause or armistice. For the election and also it take time to move supply chain out of China.

So knowing the most right winger's train of thoughts it would be China's interest to engineer a global economic recession , sell of the bonds, and Jack up the price on shoes, clothes, toys shipping to US. Those belong to the last $300 billion worth goods Trump has threaten but has not done anything to it. This will affect US consumers quite a bit.

It would China's interest to strike first and affect the election and also won't allow US the transition time to move all the supply chain out of China.
 
Last edited:

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
Simple tariff against US product or cut back on US purchase is not enough

As Bannon explained, US goal is to break China economically and cause regime change in China.

China needs a shocker.

Complete ban of Intel product like US banning Huawei.

Still has AMD product, banning of Intel will cause a shocker and put some sense into US.

If they continue more US companies will be banned

China needs a bombshell shocker. Banning of Intel would be the start.
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
More than lighthizer, Navarro, Bannon is really the master chief architect of economic war against China.

Even he is not in the office , his game plan being carried out by the white house.

The tariff is overall war theater.

But there are also sniper action against numerous China tech companies like Huawei, ZTE, JHCC, Haikong surveillance, Sanan, etc.

Also the Joseph McCarthyism witch hunt against Chinese scientists in US.

All part of Bannon war game plan.

Goal is bring regime change, bring down Xi and put a regime kowtow to US.

Also, making Chinese vacate the man-made islands also part of the final result Bannon want to see.

He really bothered by the south China Sea situation, always tell audience how he on destroyer hunting for Soviet subs in younger days in South China Sea, US Navy unimpeded. He wants that back.

He wants US take over those Chinese man made islands once regime change completed in China.
 
Last edited:

james smith esq

Senior Member
Registered Member
Simple tariff against US product or cut back on US purchase is not enough

As Bannon explained, US goal is to break China economically and cause regime change in China.

China needs a shocker.

Complete ban of Intel product like US banning Huawei.

Still has AMD product, banning of Intel will cause a shocker and put some sense into US.

If they continue more US companies will be banned

China needs a bombshell shocker. Banning of Intel would be the start.
Intel, HELL!!! Shut down Apple!
 

gelgoog

Brigadier
Registered Member
No need to outright ban those consumer products. Just levy tariffs on them.
Also, reduce purchases of Boeing aircraft by Chinese carriers.
 

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
Keep in mind products are outright banned not just some tariff raised. Or at least No US institutions would use them.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top