055 DDG Large Destroyer Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dante80

Junior Member
Registered Member
It is completely plausible that you've just taken a Minnie Chan article seriously. Not an advisable course of action.

This is not about Minnie Chan. Even thinking that a new major class of surface combatant was inducted in a non IOC but full operational state is a profoundly illogical notion. There are no buts or ifs on this, its not an opinion. This is how things work in weapon procurement. This is a given, if you catch my drift.

The ridiculous part on this news item is the fact that it has to spell it out, like a negative. Like, this is something unordinary.
 

Marjohn

New Member
Registered Member


There's wrong, and then there's Minnie Chan wrong.

Hello, I've already noticed some kind of aversion to Minnie Chan in this forum. It's certainly justified!
Now regarding her posting in SCMP, it seems that not everyone understands English correctly.
She says that when Nanchang appeared in the naval parade, few monthes ago,she was not fully equipped, which explains why she was not admitted to active service until much later, that is, yesterday!
But of course, as Minnie Chan writes...
 

by78

General
More high-resolution images.

49379779792_ce43bb58cc_h.jpg

49379779362_e83d849acb_h.jpg
49379779487_52f6d41fc8_h.jpg

49379581081_666ad82b46_h.jpg

49379779707_2209fe33d9_h.jpg
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
You can definitely see how they relocated the EO to the stand where a navigation radar is. Just by looking at the photo on the same location where you either see the navigation radar or the EO will tell you how recent is the photo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top