timepass
Brigadier
Though its OT but just to correct you .... PAF pilots regularly flying J10s/J11s in Shaheen exercises .... Do some research prior posting ...
J-10 Thread IV
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
Though its OT but just to correct you .... PAF pilots regularly flying J10s/J11s in Shaheen exercises .... Do some research prior posting ...
No, they do not ... they sit at best in the backseat and fly with a Chinese pilot!
timepass
Brigadier
As I said, don't want to drag further, just agree to disagree...
Can we try the other with respect?
Phrases like "do some research..." are disrespecting to others.
Mostly coming from someone that is not right.
You can disagree with opinions, not facts.
Pak pilots did not flew J-10 or J-11, they were "passengers".
Phrases like "do some research..." are disrespecting to others.
Mostly coming from someone that is not right.
You can disagree with opinions, not facts.
Pak pilots did not flew J-10 or J-11, they were "passengers".
Oh come on !!! You quote and post each and every BS report from FB-fan-sites and other unreliable sources and whenever you get a reply it ends with "just agree to disagree". No, either you proof it that PAF pilots are regularly flying J-10s and J-11s or it is wrong.
It's just like telling us the sky is green and if we say no, it's blue you kill a discussion with "just agree to disagree".
timepass
Brigadier
SDF's pseudo intellectuals calling non-sense OR BS to other members are respectful?
timepass
Brigadier
Oh come on !!! You quote and post each and every BS report from FB-fan-sites and other unreliable sources and whenever you get a reply it ends with "just agree to disagree". No, either you proof it that PAF pilots are regularly flying J-10s and J-11s or it is wrong.
It's just like telling us the sky is green and if we say no, it's blue you kill a discussion with "just agree to disagree".
Kindly prove that what is being posted were BS reports of FB fan sities .... not just if said everyone would believe ...
Imagine being asked to wade through FB garbage and find the (practically non-existent) things there that are news exclusives.
If it’s JUST on FB fan pages then why wouldn’t your rational assumption be that they’re bullshit until proven true?
I think You missed a certain point: Whenever one is claiming something strange or ridiculous, it's the posters duty to proof it, not revere ... therefore show us, the sky is green and that PAF pilots regularly fly J-10 and J-11 in joint exercises.
By the way in case you forgot the BS you posonly based on FB and militarywatchmagazine all hyping potential sales of JF-17s and J-10s and always you report them as facts:
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/jf-17-fc-1-fighter-aircraft-thread.t5634/page-489#post-583720
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/jf-17-fc-1-fighter-aircraft-thread.t5634/page-442#post-555700
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/jf-17-fc-1-fighter-aircraft-thread.t5634/page-431#post-548372
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/jf-17-fc-1-fighter-aircraft-thread.t5634/page-431#post-548374
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/j-10-thread-iv.t7305/page-148#post-442847
Or do You need more proof of BS-posts you made?
General problem is with switching fighter types, you need to become familiar with the performance characteristics of the aircraft. Aircraft aren't like cars, where you can just switch from one to another without extensive retraining. F-35 pilots, for instance, undergo at least 40 hours of flight training even if they have substantial experience flying other fighter types.
So no, you can't just give PAF pilots J-10s if they have no experience in them and expect them to be able to fly it competently.