Hong-Kong Protests

bluewater2012

Junior Member
Drag this frighten old man out of taxi and beaten him on the head.

Its getting disturbing. I'm not sure how much I can look.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I could not watch the FB video but watched a similar video happened this past weekend on youtube and I’m presuming this is the same video about an old man with tattoo in the arm trying to leave the area in a taxi after being harassed by rioters for filming them.

The moment the victim exit the taxi he was hit on the head by a guy in red standing next to him with the victim phone and then his head was covered with bloods the moment he fell to the floor.

I rewatch that scene several time to find out where the bloods came from and noted before he was struck in the head with the phone, someone among the crowd either from the above crowd or behind camera shot a pellet at the victim head. I heard a shot sound before he was struck in the head with the phone. I personally think it’s similar to the weapon that blinded the girl right eye a month back that they blamed it on HK police.
 

Nutrient

Junior Member
Registered Member
You've got a lot of things confused.

I doubt I'm confused about the Cultural Revolution. You seem to have totally bought the elite propaganda -- which after all was written by the elite. Until recently with Han Dongping's book, the vast majority of China's population -- 80% of which consisted of farmers during the CR -- has been silenced.


First of all, you claimed that the CR continued because it had rural support, which is false. Support or no support, rural areas had zero input on the continuation of the CR.

Where do you think the Red Guards came from? Answer: from the areas with most of the population, i.e. the rural regions.


The CR was a political movement started by Mao to purge his political opponents, and was carried on by his wife and the rest of the Gang of Four. When Mao died, Hua Guofeng arrested the Gang of Four and stopped the CR immediately.

Some motivations for the CR may have been political, but the main reason it had such broad support throughout the Communist Party was the it was intended mostly to help the farmers.

I notice that you completely ignored Han Dongping's statistics showing the vast improvement in rural life during the CR.


When Mao died, Hua Guofeng arrested the Gang of Four and stopped the CR immediately. That alone should tell you that "rural support", even if it had existed, had zero to do with the CR.

No, it tells me that by 1976, the farmers had reached a point of diminishing returns, and they were willing to end the CR.


[The farmers'] standards of living were improved by policies that had nothing to do with the CR.

By 1965, the Communist Party had already been in power for sixteen years. Why didn't the rural standard of living improve nearly as much before the CR as it did during the CR?


It is clear to me that the current Hong Kong riots will not last as long as the Cultural Revolution; the HK people do not support the riots as overwhelmingly as the farmers supported the CR. Hong Kongers will not tolerate the violence for ten years.
 
Last edited:
Understandably, grievances don't excuse the violence and destruction caused by these people. But it doesn't mean we don't need to understand how the oppositions, traitors, and foreign agents incite fears, prejudice, hates, and ignorance through grievances.

The root causes of many of today's problem can be traced back to the colonial years especially at the very end of the colonial rule. After the failed attempt to persuade the Chinese government to delay the handover by British and the failed attempt by Pao Yue Kong(with other HK business tycoons) to set up a plan to pay the central government $10 billion HKD to lease Hong Kong for 10 years, the British government and the HK business tycoons colluded to enrich themselves before the handover. The results are the following:

1. HK has become the world most expensive housing market with a price of $2090 per sq ft and one of the most expensive rental market with an average monthly rent of $2700. The average living space of each HK resident is 170 sq ft compare with 270 sq ft in Singapore. 27% of the HK government revenue was from land sales.

The waiting list for public rental housing around the handover was 6 1/2 years. Hong Kong Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa has attempted to resolve this through building 85000 flats per year but was forced to step down but his plan did bear fruit by lowing the waiting time for public rental housing to less than 2 years between 2005 and 2009. After Tung was forced to step down, Chief executive Donald Tsang dismantled and scaled back all housing projects and Hong Kong ended up to become the world most expensive housing market.

From what I see here is that initially the central government did understand housing is a major issue and grievance for low income families but somehow they let Chief executive Tsang and oppositions usurped power. Donald Tsang is on business tycoons payroll so nothing was done to alleviate the housing prices.

2. British dissolved the powerful "Special Branch" in 1995 and amended many local laws to weaken both the government and police force. Also British passed many laws before handover to strengthen the media, civil rights, and political freedom. I don't think the central government and HK government realized how weak they have become until occupy central and recent riots. The end result is that nobody fears the government or HKPF anymore.

3. British has ensured that the judicial branch would be seated by foreign judges from British, Australia or other common laws nations by preaching judicial independent.

4. Hong Kong has followed small government, laissez-faire policies for decades, limiting government intervention in business. That created a lot of problems such as the medical council. education and the HK Journalists Association. These self-regulatory bodies have become a major problem.

For example, the HK Journalists Association was the formal body to register journalists and issue press credentials. Since the HK Journalists Association is controlled by oppositions, they turned a blinded eye to the fake press credentials. In a normal circumstance, the HK government should revoke the HK Journalists Association's ability to issue press credentials but nothing is done.

Another example, Hong Kong has a shortage of medical doctors and nurses but due to the fact that the medical council is self regulated. Hong Kong doesn't allowed any foreign doctors or nurses to practice in HK. In addition, any medical malpractice is investigated and ruled by the medical council so pretty much doctors or nurses wouldn't get punished even they are at fault.

There is also the HK educational system. It pretty much is also self-regulated. Nothing is done to prevent teachers from teaching anti-China propaganda.

All I want to say is that the HK government and pro-Beijing legislators are weak and pathetic. They have allowed the oppositions to usurp powers from them. They never dared to confront hard issues and make necessary changes in education, media and judicial. They have gotten too cozy with the business tycoons. Whatever temporary peace they got with the rioters would not last til they act decisively.

The blame for coddling or catering to big money special interests including property developers goes all around the Hong Kong political spectrum, including both pro-government and anti-government camps such as those who support the current riots. Note that none of the peaceful protesters', violent rioters', nor their supporters' demands have to do with the cost of living or housing.

I do agree with the parts of your post that there was a lot of setting Hong Kong and China up for the fall by the British colonial administration in its final years, the effects of which are still felt today. The reason why not much has been done to alter these arrangements such as the judicial system is because they are in fact beneficial to Hong Kong's entrenched big money special interests and established role servicing trade between China and the West. Again this is something the entire political spectrum of Hong Kong is guilty of, both the leadership and the ordinary people who are too risk averse to prepare for the inevitable time when there will not be a need for a middleman for trade between China and the West.
 

Nutrient

Junior Member
Registered Member
It is clear to me that the current Hong Kong riots will not last as long as the Cultural Revolution; the HK people do not support the riots as overwhelmingly as the farmers supported the CR. Hong Kongers will not tolerate the violence for ten years.

It is also clear that the thugs are growing more vicious because they are getting desperate to provoke a Beijing intervention. The rioters (or their controllers) must know that they are rapidly bleeding support, and they want some reaction from Beijing while they still have local sympthasizers.
 

solarz

Brigadier
Where do you think the Red Guards came from? Answer: from the areas with most of the population, i.e. the rural regions.

You're bloody kidding me right???

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


红卫兵,是
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
时期对部分特殊人群的一种称呼,其成员大部分是由高校(
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,即大专院校以上的学校,并非指
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
和以下各级学校)以上的
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
所组成。

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


红卫兵是指“文化大革命”中,大、中学生成立的群众组织,也指其成员

pB43k.jpg
 

Nutrient

Junior Member
Registered Member
You're bloody kidding me right???

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


红卫兵,是中国在文化大革命时期对部分特殊人群的一种称呼,其成员大部分是由高校(高等学校,即大专院校以上的学校,并非指高中职和以下各级学校)以上的学生所组成


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


红卫兵是指“文化大革命”中,大、中学生成立的群众组织,也指其成员

Your snippets only say that the Red Guards were mostly students, but do not say where the students came from. This is an English-language forum, so I will counter with an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
:

The Red Guards were often poor and uneducated teenagers and young adults from the countryside.

(Emphasis added.) (I don't agree with the rest of the Quora article, but that first sentence is spot on.)

As I said, most of the Red Guards were from rural areas; perhaps their leaders were university students, but the vast bulk of the fighting force was from the countryside.

It was support from the rural people -- 80% of China's population at the time -- that kept the Cultural Revolution going for as long as it did. I notice that you have again ignored Han Dongping's statistics showing how much the farmers benefited from the CR. Hence they supported it.

The Hong Kong people will not support the current rioters for long, if indeed most of them ever did. The more vicious the thugs become, the less support they'll have.
 
Last edited:
The Cultural Revolution? 'Maoism in action' was what I'd been taught in a Communistic high school thirty+ years ago, and didn't think about it since then
 

solarz

Brigadier
Your snippets only say that the Red Guards were mostly students, but do not say where the students came from. This is an English-language forum, so I will counter with an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
:



(Emphasis added.) (I don't agree with the rest of the Quora article, but that first sentence is spot on.)

As I said, most of the Red Guards were from rural areas; perhaps their leaders were university students, but the vast bulk of the fighting force was from the countryside.

It was support from the rural people -- 80% of China's population at the time -- that kept the Cultural Revolution going for as long as it did. I notice that you have again ignored Han Dongping's statistics showing how much the farmers benefited from the CR. Hence they supported it.

The Hong Kong people will not support the current rioters for long, if indeed most of them ever did. The more vicious the thugs become, the less support they'll have.

Really? Quora is your source? No wonder you have these bizarre misconceptions.

FYI, there were no high schools in villages back then. You needed at least township level for that. Schools had been suspended for a while before the first Red Guard formed. The Red Guards were basically city kids that had nothing else to do.

Look, you're talking to someone whose parents and grandparents lived through the Cultural Revolution. I literally grew up listening to their stories about those times.

Again, the economic improvement during the cultural revolution years were not due to the CR.
 
Top