Hong-Kong Protests

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
The above does not make you sound good.
I have worked for around 2 years on a daily basis with Chinese on projects.
In India the chinese engineers and interpreter would watch bbc(propaganda) and other western news channels the most.
We were in the middle of a national election and they would laugh that in China the head would be selected years before the present guy retired.
They would criticize our 4 lane roads as too crowded and I had to explain to them the stages of resistance any project in India has to pass through, from NGOs, environmental, local villagers, local politicians, local government, etc, before even the financial package comes through .
He gave me a example of wreckers reaching residential areas in the morning in China and going about the breaking, after a weeks notice, with police help.
You are proudly espousing discrimination against Southern Chinese, which I cannot identify with.
The main difference is whether a nation is made of humans or only the territory.

Just because you know a few Chinese and visited China, you think you understand China now. Quiet an ego you have. I studied and worked with plenty of Indians over the years and I would never have claimed i know India
 

jimmyjames30x30

Junior Member
Registered Member
The above does not make you sound good.
I have worked for around 2 years on a daily basis with Chinese on projects.
In India the chinese engineers and interpreter would watch bbc(propaganda) and other western news channels the most.
We were in the middle of a national election and they would laugh that in China the head would be selected years before the present guy retired.
They would criticize our 4 lane roads as too crowded and I had to explain to them the stages of resistance any project in India has to pass through, from NGOs, environmental, local villagers, local politicians, local government, etc, before even the financial package comes through .
He gave me a example of wreckers reaching residential areas in the morning in China and going about the breaking, after a weeks notice, with police help.
You are proudly espousing discrimination against Southern Chinese, which I cannot identify with.
The main difference is whether a nation is made of humans or only the territory.


To be honest with you. India and China will eventually move back to the kind of traditional Sino-Indian intercultural dynamics we've had for nearly 2000 years. China will return to that meritocratic centralized bureaucratic dynasty. And India will revert back to the multicultural diversified mostly non-centralized subcontinent. In the long run, I am the least worried about Sino-Indian relation. If there is a civilization out there that Chinese people would be consistently most comfortable interacting with, it would be India. And China and India are the least geographically convenient at invading each other.
 

jimmyjames30x30

Junior Member
Registered Member
That is a simply incorrect impression of today's PRC, Chinese society, and culture, as well as an exaggeratedly dystopian slant on Chinese history.

Your perception of my idea as being "dystopian" reflects your own world view and value system, those which are deeply influenced by Modern Western Liberalism. There is no such thing as "dystopia". If a social system works, it works. If it has the ability to sustain itself and be more competitive than other forms of social system, then it is superior.

The whole concept of a "dystopia" betrays the West's deep seated fear about change and social evolution. The West is afraid of change, afraid of the possibility of an unfamiliar social system, one that is base upon a set of world views and value systems that is antithesis to their own foundations. They are afraid that such social systems will be more robust, more competitive, more powerful, and eventually out-surviving Modern Western Liberalism.

You treat anything that deviates from the foundation of Modern Western Liberalism as "dystopian". I think that anyone who is mildly interested in learning history should first learn to look at humanity and all Her possibilities without tainted glasses.
 

jimmyjames30x30

Junior Member
Registered Member
You are overthinking it my friend and you are 3 years too late. Their game plan today is about instant gratification and brute force. Nothing subtle with the constant blatant lies and you only count the damage you can inflict and call it a win. Perhaps too simplistic but that appears to be the plan.

Not saying that is right but what do I know. I am no president.

Well, I've always had a voice at the back of my mind telling me "you are overthinking it". I will take your word and listen to this voice now.
 
Well, I've always had a voice at the back of my mind telling me "you are overthinking it". I will take your word and listen to this voice now.

Seriously now since you had previously replied to Equation's post.

Don't get me wrong, there are a quite a number of Christians that are wonderful people and I truly respect them not because they are rich or powerful, beautiful or generous or submissive but because they are truly wonderful people.

Nonetheless, there are the other less benevolent elements in the same community(politicians and voters). The Christian centric Western civilization has seen its power steadily eroded this past 2 decade, they are concerned and are inclined to act and check the rise of a non-christian civilization. The rise of China, no matter how peaceful are events that challenges the established order, their sense of pride(superiority) along with all the associated entitlement. While some of them may condone the peaceful rise of China, but the instinct is to prevent and hinder such an event.

Unfortunately, many Chinese heavily influenced through their faith in HK as well as China are indoctrinated and willingly serving as good Christian soldier to preserve the Christian world order and disrespecting non-conforming views. They have willingly(adults) and unwillingly(children) allowed themselves to be indoctrinated to HATE the PRC and by extension China and Chinese people. Most of them are too young to experience any true oppression, hardship, or injustices. Have you ever wondered why these protestors keep insisting they are not Chinese. They have been indoctrinated to believe that as HKer, they can disassociate themselves from being Chinese although in fact it is not mutually exclusive. This does not just happen and it suggest there was indoctrination and rationalization involved in their thought process.

Nothing inherently wrong with being Christian unless if you willingly surrender yourself, as the bible teaches, for the sake of salvation and allow yourself to become a tool to suppress non-Christian beliefs and way-of life, you have lost your own identity and self-respect. Now how can one respect someone who does not respect themselves.

I've met many westerners openly antagonistic towards Chinese and when they see me at a church event would say something like it's ok you are one of us, meaning we are all Christian. duh.

Going back to your question, the dynamics to hinder China's peaceful rise are deep rooted. It is just blatantly obvious today because we live in a Trumpian world where the modus operandi is preservation of Christian Western Order and entitlements. That is why the religious right supports Trump not because he a TRUE Christian but because they see him as another tool to preserve a predominant Christian-centric order.

Of course there are also many other factors involved but this is one of the major dynamics contributing to the clash of civilization as you mentioned.
 
Last edited:

Equation

Lieutenant General
You don't need to reason with me to get that across. I KNOW AS A FACT that the majority of people on earth thinks that the modern world revolves around them. And I have a bucket list of reasons, from metaphysical disposition to the mental health. My focus point was never on the cause of the event. I am more interested in seeing the motives and visions of the benefactors who are backing up the rioters.

Easy...to keep the myth of their superiority alive at any cost. Otherwise that meant that their god and empire are not legit in human history.
 
Your perception of my idea as being "dystopian" reflects your own world view and value system, those which are deeply influenced by Modern Western Liberalism. There is no such thing as "dystopia". If a social system works, it works. If it has the ability to sustain itself and be more competitive than other forms of social system, then it is superior.

The whole concept of a "dystopia" betrays the West's deep seated fear about change and social evolution. The West is afraid of change, afraid of the possibility of an unfamiliar social system, one that is base upon a set of world views and value systems that is antithesis to their own foundations. They are afraid that such social systems will be more robust, more competitive, more powerful, and eventually out-surviving Modern Western Liberalism.

You treat anything that deviates from the foundation of Modern Western Liberalism as "dystopian". I think that anyone who is mildly interested in learning history should first learn to look at humanity and all Her possibilities without tainted glasses.

Actually your post I replied to is what aligns with your supposed Modern Western (neo-)Liberalism in generalizing and demonizing Chinese (including PRC) culture and history.
 
now I read
Hong Kong elite need to update their national recognition
Source:Global Times Published: 2019/9/9 22:28:41
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Amid the hurly-burly of protests, echo of the slogan "Revive Hong Kong, revolution of our times" rang aloud as city scholar Chow Po-chung gloated over "our golden era" to fight for so-called democracy, justifying the rampaging actions of demonstrators. What kind of "times" are the radical protesters expecting? What are the core values and political appeals of their "times?" Apparently, the divergence in ideology and values is the deeper reason of the anti-extradition bill protests.

The radical protesters' "times" are Westernized times that closely relate to colonial modernity and Western values. Their main political appeal is freedom and democracy. But under the "one country, two systems" principle and the Basic Law, Hong Kong's freedom has been fully guaranteed. Hong Kong's freedom and democracy must be in line with the sovereignty, security and development interests of the "one country." However, Hong Kong opposition groups' "revolution of our times" aims at overthrowing "one country, two systems," and they are pursuing a so-called universal democracy. Their "times" also refer to absolute autonomy and even Hong Kong secession.

Such radical thoughts are influenced by Hong Kong's political and cultural elite. From the pan-democracy camp, to civil disobedience, to the "valiant" rioters, it shows how deeply such colonial thoughts are rooted among Hong Kong elite. In the highly Westernized Hong Kong elite' opinion, modernity, as the core standard of civilization, is nothing but a whole set of concepts and systems of colonialism. They use Hong Kong nativism memories to coordinate with such colonial modernity, and they feel no identification with the "one country" system.

Since Hong Kong returned to China in 1997, these elite have set up their cultural dominance in Hong Kong, based on Western cultural advantages and media networks. They remain vigilant against patriotic education and education on the country's politics and history. They identify with the UK, and even believe that Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy comes from the British government's endeavor in the Sino-British Joint Declaration. They welcome the UK's continued interference in Hong Kong, completely ignoring the basic historical fact of Hong Kong's return to China. These elite neither don't understand the Chinese central government's constitutional design, nor the real basis of Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy, prosperity and stability. Although they know it is impossible to make the city secede from China, they started political movements again and again. The movements have been veneered by democracy so as to gain support of foreign forces.

The so-called complete autonomy is their long-lasting goal but Hong Kong's secession is opportunistic - they can wreak havoc in the country even though they fail. These elite and youth educated by them want to prove they are aligned with the West by radically opposing their own country. They rush to "the end of history" regardless of the future proposed by the great rejuvenation of Chinese nation.

Deeply affected by radical ideas, Hong Kong elite have been completely wrong in understanding the "one China, two systems" principle and the national strategy. "Five demands" proposed by radical protesters aimed at paralyzing the SAR government and exempting protesters. They intend to call white as black and claim the SAR government is totally wrong, the police are responsible for all the chaos and that protesters are right and innocent.

They place abstract freedom and democratic values above the rule of law in Hong Kong, seeking their extreme political goals by breaking the bottom line of rule of law. These elites want to establish an anarchic system in Hong Kong to replace the executive-led system established by the Basic Law. The extreme political power grab has de facto become a color revolution in Hong Kong.

In the anti-extradition bill chaos, these Hong Kong elite act as missionaries of Western values, which have dominated the democratic concept and movements in Hong Kong under the policy of "one China, two systems." Such being the case, they would certainly oppose the integration of "two systems" in every aspect ranging from systematic link like the extradition bill to economic connection like the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.

Their misunderstanding of China's development is dragging down the city. These elite have become hurdles to the city's development and governance, and they are paying a heavy price for being outdated.

They must update their concept of the new era, re-recognize China and the world and go in line with the central government so that they can maintain their leadership and influence in Hong Kong. Otherwise, they will be marginalized together with the decline of the West.
 
Top