Hong-Kong Protests

OK let me see since you persist. Obviously many members agree that you have a tendency to post falsehood without verification based on the response to my post.

where to start.



Lookin at one of your recent post.
First, You still referred to the Sino-British Joint Declaration for handover of Hong Kong as a treaty despite being repeatedly told that it is not. You ignored all those It shows lack of respect.
Second, you state that this declaration (or treaty as you erroneously keep repeating) has UK involvement until 2047 which it does not. UK role in this declaration with completed of handover in 1997. You failed to show what actions UK has post 1997 despite repeated being asked to do so. the declaration itself does not support your repeated assertion.
Third, you posted a link that has proven to be a fake website.

You have a propensity to post inflamatory fake news and they typically start as "Now I Read <<Full Stop>>". You make no other comments which means you are unwilling take responsibility for the content which oftentimes are inflamatory. True? Deny if you like but your actions reveal your intent. Why even post if you have no comment or opinion other than to provoke and elicit an angry response. Those articles are not even rare as they are posted all over MSM on top of google news. You post them here in your face with intent to upset.

Once you posted a blog or tabloid site and was told it was not even remotely reliable source. You counter with what was supposed to be a reliable source. You suggested perhaps global times, Xinhua, or People Daily punctuated by "LOL". Yet another attempt to provoke and ridicule by equating them to a blog or tabloid.

Not sure how Machiavellian behaviors are valued in your part of the world. We have many smart members in this forum with serious topics and we all deserve some respect. People have mostly learned to ignore your oftentimes meaningless post as the moderators seems to tolerate your behavior. If you have anything of substance to post. By all means do so. Otherwise, do a quick verification before posting something inflammatory and not just "NOW I READ" unless you intention is as I stated.

Clear?
LOL it's hilarious what you wrote, because
"now I read"
I use only for Xinhua, Global Times, and SCMP, and the reason is in the past (around 2016) I got attacked because of commenting on Xinhua

(of course I'm assuming you Dolce. would never call Xinhua "inflamatory fake news")

thanks for the feedback anyway
 
continuation of 22 minutes ago
:
just to finish here, and since I'm on a train, I did a search and (I don't want to drag anyone else into this)
Sep 7, 2016
I said I would've thought officially there had been no "China's rust belt" (after a Xinhua article mentioning "China's rust belt")
and was asked why, which I answered
Sep 8, 2016
because, in my imagination, Xinhua informs only about so called great achievements, and the rest is taboo ... that's how it was in Central Europe when I was a kid, in outlets like

Red Justice
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

People's Tribune
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(I admit from time to time they mentioned something negative, but then people described in such a story would end up in jail)

and, in my imagination, continental China now = Eastern Block in 1980s
and later I got hit, and decided not to comment on Xinhua any more

EDIT
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:
anyway the latest:
5:35PM
Tear gas fired
Police have fired tear gas in Tsuen Wan. Protesters hurl bricks and projectiles in return.
LIVE
Hong Kong protesters and police face off as marchers build barricades in Tsuen Wan
  • Police warn they will conduct a dispersal operation soon as protesters leave agreed route of march
  • Force earlier said water cannons would be used if situation turned ugly
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
This is a reversal of perpetrator and victim. The police fired tear gas in Tsuen Wan in return of Protesters hurled bricks and projectiles.

I actually saw the live video clip from earlier today, The protestors was charging the police and the police warned them to stop or else they will use force. Clearly the protestors were the aggressive party but good luck finding that on the MSM.
 

duncanidaho

Junior Member
I actually saw the live video clip from earlier today, The protestors was charging the police and the police warned them to stop or else they will use force. Clearly the protestors were the aggressive party but good luck finding that on the MSM.

That's what I mean. In the original post, it sounds like the police escalate the situation, but in reality the police only answer to the violence of the protestors.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
This is a reversal of perpetrator and victim. The police fired tear gas in Tsuen Wan in return of Protesters hurled bricks and projectiles.

Propoganda at its best! I saw the clip as well, talk about manipulating news nartatives to suit your agenda.

Even now, after all these weeks, none of the MSM ever trying to call it riots, etc. It just keeps saying violent errupt ....... and sometimes even add after police charged! (If I gey a $ for everytime I had to explaine to my friends and co-workers that it is actually rioting. I would be rich).

Here's a poto of TVB trying to get public sympathy for what's happening in Hong Kong by showing a woman whose son died in TAM square. (what's that got to do with Hong Kong)?

But managed to botch it, as there got the year all wrong. The woman must have been 5 years old in order to have given birth! Lol you can't make it up! FB_IMG_1566736473127.jpg
 
Last edited:

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
That's what I mean. In the original post, it sounds like the police escalate the situation, but in reality the police only answer to the violence of the protestors.
That's what I mean. In the original post, it sounds like the police escalate the situation, but in reality the police only answer to the violence of the protestors.

Hers the clip, I?'m not sure if its same as yours, but it does shows who's the aggressors!

With baseball bats, and catapult to boot. If that happened in US or France, god know what would happened to the rioters.

Also, I heard the injury list in the recent riots in France was in the thousands. So in comparison Hong Kong police is very restrained! But the MSM is still trying to suggest they are police brutality in Hong Kong!

 
Top