You know what I'm amazed by? How many times you came back and how many graphs/charts you put up trying to defend something that you twice said is no big deal.
I'm also amazed by how many times you've regurgitated that it's unreasonable to make assumptions in the absence of evidence despite being told probably close to 5 times that some things are basic enough to assume without evidence, with examples, no less (assumption such as future computers being functional, people who you've never seen eating actually do eat, etc...). Want another example? Can J-20 fly higher than 20,000 feet? Have you seen it fly at over that height before? Then we can't assume that it can, right? Ignoring these points like they were never brought up doesn't make then disappear. The fact that no other modern fighter has this limitation is evidence enough.
Mr. Brumby asked an honest question? for which you have NO answer? None, but instead of doing a little research or even offering your reasoning for assuming the answer is affirmative, you chose to personally attack his logic and reasoning???
by the way, he offered some excellent resources lending credibility to his own research..
He has not put "you" down, he has not put the "J-20" down, but the fact that he is searching for honest answers, and gives an excellent and well reasoned argument asking if the J-20 has had a successful supersonic weapons release offends you???
Sino Defense Forum has traditionally and historically been an adult, 99% male, military forum Gents, so lets agree not to be offensive, and not to take offense where none has been intended......