ARM cuts ties with Huawei, threatening future chip designs

Status
Not open for further replies.
Then I think your faculties need examination.

You're dissing the founder of ARM technologies now. Go ahead and try to argue with him. lol
nah, it's more fun to read about the US characterization as "a rogue state" or sentences like "It will also be the start of the thorough collapse of US global supremacy."
here's a tougher link:
Flailing against the world, US may risk losing everything
Source:Global Times Published: 2019/6/27 20:08:40
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
stuff I heard 30 years ago, you know

LOL now, but back then I had to clasp my hands
 

Quickie

Colonel
LOL if I were to choose one from
  1. the Global Times Today at 4:27 PM
  2. the Italian blog post Today at 4:12 PM
  3. your tabloid Today at 6:04 PM
it'd be, entertainment-wise, #1

You wouldn't discredit option 1 as just entertainment if you know for a fact that when its news editor tweets, Wall Street listens.

And when Wall Streets listens, you know that the news info is credible enough, for them, to be taken seriously.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
You wouldn't discredit option 1 as just entertainment if you know for a fact that when its news editor tweets, Wall Street listens.

And when Wall Streets listens, you know that the news info is credible enough, for them, to be taken seriously.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
LOL the latest tweet as of now by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

praises what I noticed earlier today, but couldn't post about so that I don't go political here, though it's kind of fascinating
(it's ... membership base)
:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

styx

Junior Member
Registered Member
'Every single supplier in the world will start thinking of how to reduce the threat of their production being terminated by an American president. All the discussions I have with companies in Europe at the moment are about them going through their intellectual property portfolio and designing American intellectual property out, which is terribly sad and destructive.'

It's our turn to laugh

And AGI (agenzia giornalistica italia) is not an italian blog

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
it's an historic press agency
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
What's more stupid is believing the US needs no one but everyone needs the US. Trump was looking for an excuse to stop himself from slapping tariffs on the rest of China's exports because those will hurt the US more since they composed mostly of US corporations outsourcing to China to which Trump has been mostly avoiding. They're trying make themselves believe those slave labor jobs are more important to China than a 25% tarriff Americans will be paying. That's why $30 billion US farmers will lose trumps the US's $20 trillion economy. People's own interest rules above anything else. Then Trump was so drunk thinking the US had that much power that he didn't even think that if he bans a large customer like China from buying American, that means Americans don't make money. That's why the backtrack. The world decoupling from US hegemony is what they're afraid of Made in China 2025. It's not intent. It's nature at work.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
'Every single supplier in the world will start thinking of how to reduce the threat of their production being terminated by an American president. All the discussions I have with companies in Europe at the moment are about them going through their intellectual property portfolio and designing American intellectual property out, which is terribly sad and destructive.'

It's our turn to laugh

And AGI (agenzia giornalistica italia) is not an italian blog

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
it's an historic press agency

Correct.

But the Italian article was from the blog section, so it hasn't gone through the "official" editorial process.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
What's more stupid is believing the US needs no one but everyone needs the US. Trump was looking for an excuse to stop himself from slapping tariffs on the rest of China's exports because those will hurt the US more since they composed mostly of US corporations outsourcing to China to which Trump has been mostly avoiding. They're trying make themselves believe those slave labor jobs are more important to China than a 25% tarriff Americans will be paying. That's why $30 billion US farmers will lose trumps the US's $20 trillion economy. People's own interest rules above anything else. Then Trump was so drunk thinking the US had that much power that he didn't even think that if he bans a large customer like China from buying American, that means Americans don't make money. That's why the backtrack. The world decoupling from US hegemony is what they're afraid of Made in China 2025. It's not intent. It's nature at work.

But that is how a large section of US political decision makers still think. That they run the world and that everyone needs them.

They are in denial that the world has changed, and when reality does pierce through, many just get angry and lash out.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
nah, it's more fun to read about the US characterization as "a rogue state" or sentences like "It will also be the start of the thorough collapse of US global supremacy."

stuff I heard 30 years ago, you know

LOL now, but back then I had to clasp my hands

30 years ago in 1989, the USA had a population and economy roughly twice the size of its nearest competitor Japan.
So Japan displacing the USA and leading to the collapse of US global supremacy, was always unlikely to happen.
Despite this, the US political class feared such an event, which contributed to the US-Japan trade wars.

In comparison, China is a lot bigger, and is still growing fast.

Also, here's one from the Atlantic with the French President calling the USA a rogue state
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

SteelBird

Colonel
Regarding Ark OS, I'm afraid you guys are too excited that you forget one big guy; the mobile OS's cartel "GOOGLE". Assume Huawei's ban is lift so Google can continue to supply its Android to Huawei, do you think Google is happy seeing Ark OS challenging its near monopoly in mobile OS position? iOS lives in its own world, so we don't care. I remember some years ago Alibaba developed its Aliyun OS and wanted to launch in some model of some hand-phone. I don't remember which one. Google threatened that if the company launch Aliyun on the mobile phone, Google will cut its Android from that company entirely. So what about Huawei's situation today? If I to stand in Google's position, I'd tell Huawei "you better keep the Ark OS in your safe, or this time not the US government but I WILL BAN YOU!"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top