(Emphasis added.)
It's not surprising that they want to be anonymous. The U.S. itself (i.e. Trump) set the precedent that it is legal for a country to attack a specific company (like ZTE and Huawei).
Trade War with China
- Thread starter Ultra
- Start date
- Status
(Emphasis added.)
It's not surprising that they want to be anonymous. The U.S. itself (i.e. Trump) set the precedent that it is legal for a country to attack a specific company (like ZTE and Huawei).
You just got to love what he said; about 3min in, he said Trump just don't understand it (meaning economics). Trump tweeted over the weekend saying "how wonderful that the Chinese are paying billions of dolllors worth in tariffs to the US.
Any economics students would flunk their course if they stated that" lol
All Trump's supporters believe everything he tweets! And the sad thing is, Trump believes his own tweets too!
They want to remain anonymous because they want their cakes and eat it!
These companies are making good money out of the Chinese market, dispise all the "complaints about forced tech transfer, unlevel playing field, etc"
And they definately want to remain in the China market after all these unpleasantry have passed.
I don't think it's anything malicious. Just that the story is back and you have a lot of newcomers just searching and not looking at the date.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
Anonymous is also code for they made it up. As Mike Pompeo admitted when working for the CIA that the US lies, cheats, and steals. It goes to show how they're hypocrites... again, where the government isn't suppose to help private businesses as to where they accuse China and yet the US government gets to look out for US companies all the time.
The full text of last year's draft framework is available in PDF and was posted in this thread. You don't have to rely on Bloomberg's summary of it. FT (and other sources I'm sure) published it verbatim.
I'm not sure how your consideration is relevant to recent developments, however. If anything, you should question the recent Reuters report that quoted administration officials' claims that China reneged on pledges to change its laws relating to trade and portrayed this as the source of the breakdown. Even then, it's more about questioning whether their sources were intentionally attempting to mislead the media and manipulate the market/domestic audience, which is par for the course.
Last edited:
Hendrik_2000
Lieutenant General
I anxious as to the outcome of this talk But here he is in live interview vice premier Liu He
Chinese Vice Premier Liu He arrived in Washington on Thursday for the 11th round of high-level economic and trade consultations with the U.S. side. Liu told reporters upon his arrival that he came to Washington with sincerity, saying that under the current special circumstances he hopes to engage in rational and candid exchanges with the U.S. side.
Chinese Vice Premier Liu He arrived in Washington on Thursday for the 11th round of high-level economic and trade consultations with the U.S. side. Liu told reporters upon his arrival that he came to Washington with sincerity, saying that under the current special circumstances he hopes to engage in rational and candid exchanges with the U.S. side.
rational and candid? with this administration? ha! considering liu he was apparently asking xi to allow more concessions to the u.s., and thankfully xi shut him down hard, i have to ponder if xi is just using him as a fall guy so that when the talks collapse, xi can scapegoat him. people ready to sign new unequal treaties are plenty deserving of being scapegoated
Jura The idiot
General
congrats
Cypher
to be the first to inform LOL
from what I figured (), it's effective since Friday midnight Eastern Time (right now it's less than one hour)
the CNN headline still is
Tariffs loom as US-China talks begin
now
- Status