Trade War with China

Status
Not open for further replies.
now I read
Donald Trump’s crackdown on Chinese investment in US sparks huge shift into venture capital
  • Chinese FDI to the US dropped 83 per cent last year to US$5 billion, report shows
  • Investors facing tough scrutiny turned to VC deals; others pulled out of US
Updated: 1:28pm, 8 May, 2019
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Chinese investors, finding the US business environment uninviting, are turning to venture capital to skirt heightened scrutiny, while some have pivoted to other parts of the world altogether.

Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) into the US plummeted for the second straight year in 2018, tumbling 83 per cent to US$5 billion, according to a Wednesday report by the National Committee on US China Relations.

A year earlier, FDI amounted to US$29 billion, down from the peak of US$46 billion achieved in 2016.

The latest figure represented the lowest level of direct investment by China since 2011. In 2018, Chinese investors sold US$13 billion worth of US assets. Including those sales, direct investment in the US came to negative US$8 billion.

The Trump administration has recently toughened its oversight of Chinese investment in the wake of a splurge of Chinese acquisitions, particularly in US technology, viewed as a national security threat.

Chinese investors, as a result, are shifting into venture capital to avoid the stepped-up surveillance.

Last year, venture capital investments from China to the US, an area that has existed for only about five years, increased to a record US$3.6 billion, mainly on automotive industry investment.

Chinese venture capital had remained largely untouched by US regulators up to November 2018, allowing deal activity to continue somewhat strongly in semiconductors amid sharp drops in direct investment, the report said.

Other investors from China pulled out of the US completely and shifted their focus to other parts of the world.

Consequently, Chinese investment in emerging and frontier markets in Asia nearly tripled last year, surging 198 per cent from the year-earlier period, according to Asian Development Bank.

Looking forward, “Chinese firms’ commercial appetite for investing abroad remain strong,” researchers wrote in the report. “However, policy hurdles in both the US and China remain significant headwinds.”

The overall decline in FDI continued for a second year as the US-China relationship grew increasingly hostile with US President Donald Trump’s levying of punitive tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars of Chinese goods nearly a year ago, launching the trade war.

Since then, US trade negotiators have been pressuring China to implement structural changes to level the playing field for foreign companies doing business in China.

The requested reforms would include halting the subsidising of large state-owned businesses and cracking down on intellectual property theft.

The US negotiating team also wants to end the practice of forcing foreign companies to transfer proprietary technology to Chinese joint venture partners.

Disagreements over the implementation of some of these remedies have become a stumbling block in both sides’ efforts to forge a deal that would end a tariff war that has hurt both China’s economy and the global economy.

Trump’s unpredictable behaviour and decision-making process, however, have thrown a wrench into efforts to steer the trade battle to a conclusion.

In an abrupt turn, Trump tweeted this weekend that he planned to boost tariffs on US$200 billion of Chinese goods to 25 per cent from 10 per cent on Friday.

Accusing China of reneging on already negotiated deal terms, the US leader dealt a setback to those hoping for an imminent end to the trade war.

After a splurge of acquisitions in the US, Beijing moved to control the flow of outbound capital, causing a drop in direct Chinese investment in the US.

The government prohibited Chinese investors from acquiring assets in real estate, hospitality and other sectors.

In the past year, major Chinese companies that had led the acquisition binge in 2015 and 2016 have sold assets worth billions of US dollars to bring capital back to China to boost domestic growth.

In March, Premier Li Keqiang said in his government work report that Beijing would set a lower economic growth target for this year of 6 to 6.5 per cent, down from the target of “about 6.5 per cent” set for last year.

It also said it would step up fiscal measures to stabilise growth, after factoring in headwinds, including the trade war, an already high debt level and financing bottlenecks for private enterprises.

HNA, a conglomerate with businesses ranging from finance to aviation, has put hotels, real estate holdings and airlines and other assets on the market with a potential value of US$50 billion.

Anbang, a holding company that started out in the insurance business and has expanded into banking and financial services announced the sale of its US luxury hotel portfolio, valued at about US$10 billion.

The company is known for its aggressive global expansion, including its US$2 billion acquisition of New York’s famed Waldorf Astoria hotel in 2014.

On the flip side, US venture investment in China soared to a record US$19 billion, nearly doubling the previous high of US$9.4 billion a year earlier.

And foreign direct investment from the US into China stayed largely flat at US$13 billion in 2018 from US$14 billion in 2017, according to the report from the National Committee on US China Relations.

China, however, dropped to seventh in 2018 among likely destinations for direct investment by foreign investors, according to the latest FDI Confidence Index, released on Tuesday.

It was the country’s lowest ranking in the 20-year history of the index, which is tracked by Washington-based management consultancy AT Kearney.

China was the top destination for foreign investment for the 10 years ended 2012.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Thanks for clarifying, but in this case, what are the incentives and motivations to develop a weapon platform as good as those developed by Boeing or Lockheed Martin? I am asking because products like the F-35 and F-22 are results of market-driven cut-throat competitions between defense industries. For example, when Boeing's X-32 lost to Lockheed's X-35, some engineer at Boeing risked losing their jobs for the loss. CEOs had to deal with losing everything the company put into developing the X-32. I am wondering if the same threat of potentially losing one's job for not coming up with the best design is a source of motivation behind those who designed the J-20 and other cutting edge Chinese weapon platforms. Or are there other potentially more creative non-market incentives within the PRC's military-industrial complex to ensure that engineers and other employees strive for the best?


Competition exists, even more so in the Chinese military industrial complex because it still has more players, whereas in the US complex it has whittled down to a few players. Even in Russia's military industrial complex there are also competitors.

In China, for example, on radar alone, there is Institute 14 vs. Institute 23 vs. Institute 607. In aircraft there is Chengdu vs. Shenyang vs. Harbin vs. Xian. In shipbuilding there is Jiangnan, Hudong Zhonghua, Huludao, and Dalian, among others. Even if they are SOEs, the SOEs compete against each other, because it affects the careers and upward mobility of those engineers and managed involved, if not in monetary rewards, then in prestige and social rank.

In fact, i don't think the PLA's modernization would be where it is right now, if it weren't for the competition and the upward disruption caused by companies like Chengdu AC, Jiangnan shipyard and Institute 14 (NRIET) in Nanjing over previously established and now former champions.
 

Franklin

Captain
It doesn't matter what president Trump tweets or says. The Americans can't make good on those threats. Those actions will cause the US markets to fall and inflation to rise. Which will put the US and the world economy in a very precarious position. Because the so called growth over the past decade has been based on asset price inflation build on top of artificial low interest rate. Falling markets and rising inflation would send the entire thing crashing down. And the crisis that follows would make 2008 look like a picknick.
 
Last edited:

Xizor

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Meanwhile from our mates in SCMP comes this article, no stepping back, for honour and country.
Damn right China. US does have a point in noting that the trade is imbalanced and China hasn't been playing fair BUT that doesn't mean US can shove it around. US hasn't been playing it fair either - the petro dollar fiat reserve currency and it's corporations being fat olygopoly due to government incentives, tax breaks, lobbying and protectionism . Let the one without sin cast the first stone.
 
now I read
China ready for prolonged US trade war
Source:Global Times Published: 2019/5/8 23:13:40
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Nation’s resilience, policy incentives to help weather rift

After US officials threatened to escalate its trade war with China, rattling global financial markets and angering some US businesses, there is a distinctive, palpable level of calmness in China. Many in the foreign press gushed about how calm China was over the latest threats from US officials.

The US will raise tariffs from 10 percent to 25 percent on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports effective Friday, according to a notice posted on the Federal Register's website on Wednesday.

But interviews with Chinese businesses and analysts on Wednesday showed that behind the calmness is overwhelming confidence in the business world and other sectors in the country that China is prepared to fight a protracted trade battle with the US, if necessary, and that China is better positioned than the US to cope with the consequences.

In Dongguan, a major manufacturing hub in South China's Guangdong Province, which is also considered the "world's factory," manufacturers and exporters said that after a year of dealing with the tariffs war, they are fully prepared for a further escalation.

At the invitation of the US side, Vice Premier Liu He will travel to Washington from Thursday to Friday, kicking off the 11th round of trade negotiations with his US counterparts, Geng Shuang, spokesperson of Chinese Foreign Ministry, told a press briefing on Wednesday.

Overwhelming confidence

"Though the pressure exists, I'm confident in the business outlook," CH Kwok, general manager of Dongguan LC Technology Co which exports millions of dollars worth of toys and electronics a year to the US for companies such as Kid Galaxy and Mattel, told the Global Times on Wednesday.

Kwok argued that if the US continues to increase tariffs on Chinese products, US importers and retailers, and eventually consumers, will bear the brunt because they will not be able to find alternative sources to import certain products without paying higher prices, at least in the short term.

"It will be difficult for US firms to find replacements, because a mature supply chain cannot be fostered overnight," he said, noting that though some factories have shifted their production lines to countries such as Bangladesh and Vietnam, they still rely on China for certain materials, which then would raise costs.

Underscoring the US market's heavy reliance on Chinese products, the latest Chinese customs data showed on Wednesday that despite facing heavy duties, Chinese exports to the US declined only 4.8 percent year-on-year in yuan terms in the first four months of the year, compared to a 26.8 percent drop in imports from the US.

China's trade surplus with the US, one of the main grievances of the US administration against China, expanded 10.5 percent to 570.2 billion yuan ($84.17 billion) during the period, according to data from the General Administration of Customs.

Contrary to what US officials claimed, US consumers will be the ones chipping in for the additional costs not Chinese factories. "American consumers are already beginning to see higher prices on certain products, and the impact will only worsen if a deal is not reached and tariffs increase even further,??Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy of National Retail Federation of the US, told the Global Times in an earlier interview via e-mail.

If the US proceeds with the additional $325 billion in goods, that means consumer products and daily necessities such as clothing, toys, shoes, furniture and electronics could be subject to more tariffs, CNBC reported on Tuesday.

Even if the US administration is willing to further increase tariffs at a cost to its consumers, Chinese companies are also prepared to deal with that.

Jason Ye, general manager of Dongguan Yimei Houseware Co, said that as his company sees fewer orders from the US, his company and other businesses in the region were exploring other markets like Europe.

"If the disputes further escalate, we'll consider giving up the US market due to thinner profits," Ye said, noting that exports to the US only account for 10 percent of his company's total orders, which means there will be little impact on the overall business.

Stronger hand



The calmness in China also stood in stark contrast to the fallout of the threats in the US, where farmers and business groups warned of dire consequences and urged the US government to immediately resolve the issue.

Describing the tariffs as the "worst case" for US soybean growers, Davie Stephens, president of the American Soybean Association, said in a statement Tuesday, "We need a positive resolution of this ongoing tariffs dispute, not further escalation of tensions."

In a strange turn of events, even as US business groups voice strong opposition, US Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, who has opposed US President Donald Trump on almost all issues, offered support, urging Trump to "hang tough on China."

"Compared to the US, China has a more united stance, as Washington officials could not overcome their differences and missed the best negotiation opportunities," said Cao Heping, a professor of economics at Peking University.

He said that since no one has an edge in terms of size of the economy, it's about which side has more diversified and effective policies to stave off external pressure and uncertainties.

"China would have the upper hand," he said, pointing to unity and confidence in Chinese society to take on the US after a year of ups and downs, the Chinese economy's resilience and mature policies to boost growth.

Following a slew of measures, from massive stimulus packages to tax and fee cuts, the Chinese economy saw a better-than-expected performance so far this year, with improvements in consumption and investment, two of the main growth drivers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top