Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

anzha

Senior Member
Registered Member
Hmm. It's not the only driver but those points you mention have other economic activity. Or an exceptionally strong Ukranian security presence in Alliance with the regional leaders who are anything but Democratic.

The Donbas War and the Crimean Annexation are something I could discuss quite a bit since I had personal ties to the area prior to and through a year and change into the war. However, I am primarily here to learn about the Chinese military.

Russia claims it has reopened the Kerch Strait to shipping.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Whether that includes Ukrainian ships or not remains to be seen.
 
I have to leave in several minutes so I'll be quick:

gazeta.ru says (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) there's audio available from the yesterday's encounter, the part which appeared most recently at that link is

На дальнейших фрагментах записи становятся еще более тревожными. «Мне нужна помощь, мне нужна помощь! Такие географические координаты — 44, 51,0,37, 23, 4! Нуждаюсь в помощи, нуждаюсь в помощи!», — слышится срывающийся голос украинского моряка. Российский пограничник по рации спрашивает: «Сколько у вас раненных?» Украинский моряк не отвечает, продолжая звать на помощь и называя координаты.

На последней записи российский пограничник говорит: «Выйдите на связь! Я так понимаю, вы останавливаетесь… У вас крупнокалиберные пулеметы на борту! Всем выйти на палубу с поднятыми руками!».

as I said, I have to be quick:

Then the audio becomes even more disturbing. "Help needed, help needed! The coordinates 44, 51,0,37, 23, 4

I checked it'd be here:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

assuming it's 45° 51′ N, 37° 23′ 4″ E

Need assistance, need assistance!" a breaking voice of the Ukrainian sailor is heard. The Russian coast guard members asks: "How many wounded do you have?"
The Ukrainian doesn't answer, keeps calling for help and giving the coordinates.

In the last part the Russian says: "Get in touch with us! It's my understanding your vessel is stopping ... You have heavy machine-guns on the deck! All go up on the deck with hands up!"
good nobody got killed
gosh
 

Dizasta1

Senior Member
3 Ukrainians were injured during the exchange, however, once in Russian custody, the injured Ukrainians were tended to by Russian Paramedics. At least that's what I have read in the reports, so far.
 

SlothmanAllen

Junior Member
Registered Member
If the conflict escalates to open war, is there anything Ukraine can do to defend it self? I am totally ignorant of the capabilities they possess, but I cannot imagine they would stand a chance against Russia.
 

Dizasta1

Senior Member
If the conflict escalates to open war, is there anything Ukraine can do to defend it self? I am totally ignorant of the capabilities they possess, but I cannot imagine they would stand a chance against Russia.

If the "skirmish" escalates to open war, the question to ask is "who benefits the most from an open war between Ukraine and Russia?" Because one thing is for certain, that neither Ukraine, nor Russia benefit from this war. For Ukraine, well its economy is in deep turmoil to say the least. It's gas reserves dwindling, winter is full swing and it does not have a military capable of taking on Russia. Instead of rebuilding its military, reforming its economy, approaching its neighbors for mutually beneficial trade deals and wanting peace. Ukraine is flowing against the current and things look bad for its people. As for Russia, it is doing exactly what it is suppose to, by focusing a good chunk of its resources on building its economy, despite the repetitive sanctions placed on it by the West. For Russia to go into a full blown war with Ukraine, is in no way beneficial to it. All the hard work in reconstituting its economy and slowly yet proportionately modernizing its military, would go down the drain.

The only beneficiary from an open war between Russia and Ukraine, is US-UK-NATO. That's because "they" have nothing important to lose. Ukraine to US-UK-NATO is a buffer, where it can place its short and intermediate range missiles. Think of Ukraine as a punching bag for Russia, to keep Russia preoccupied and tied down there. While US-UK-NATO hit Russia from elsewhere. And the only thorn in the side of US-UK-NATO that pricks them about Russia, is Crimea and the presence of Russian Black Sea fleet.
 
Last edited:

Dizasta1

Senior Member
Atlantic Council fellow says US should warships to Azov Sea, after the Stand-Off at Kerch Strait

A senior fellow at the pro-NATO Atlantic Council has said the US should send naval ships into the Sea of Azov to guarantee it stays open after a skirmish between Russian and Ukrainian ships. Only problem is, that would be illegal. Anders Aslund, a Swedish economist who lives in Washington D.C. and works for the avidly anti-Russia think tank, implored the US and NATO to “react sharply” to what he called “the illegal Russian blockade of the international Sea of Azov.” Aslund’s suggestion came after Russia opened fire on and seized three Ukrainian navy boats on Sunday, accusing them of breaching the Russian maritime border. The Ukranian vessels were sailing between two Ukrainian ports: from Odessa in the Black Sea to Mariupol in the Azov Sea. The only waterway that connects these is the Kerch Strait between Crimea and mainland Russia. Kiev says it notified Moscow in advance that its navy ships would be sailing through the area.

Moscow denies that it was given warning. While both Russia and Ukraine have freedom of navigation in the Kerch Strait under a 2003 treaty, there are detailed technical rules on how vessels should pass through the narrow, complex waterway. All traffic in the area is controlled by the Crimean sea port of Kerch, and every ship should contact the facility, report her route and destination, and receive permission to sail through the Strait. Unfortunately for the Swedish economist, though he tweets with all the authority of someone who was on the ships in question himself, it seems he is lacking in this basic knowledge about the legality of his proposal. Luckily, chief foreign affairs correspondent for The Wall Street Journal, Yaroslav Trofimov, stepped in to help out, tweeting that aside from the “practical risks”which might arise from US ships rushing into the kerfuffle, it would also be “illegal without Russian permission.”

Trofimov cited the 2003 treaty between Russia and Ukraine which declared the Azov Sea to be “internal waters” and which only guarantees freedom of navigation for Russian and Ukrainian military vessels. There is a practical problem with the proposal as well: the Azov Sea is simply too shallow. US Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class destroyers have a draft of 9.3 meters (30 feet), while the *average* depth of the Azov Sea is only 7 meters (23 feet), with the deepest point being twice that. Aslund, who frequently raises eyebrows among more knowledgeable Russia experts and is known for his dramatic hot takes on Twitter, also compared the incident to Adolf Hitler’s invasion of Poland — so the complexities of reality are unlikely to deter him. He also claimed that a quiet response to the incident from US officials meant that President Donald Trump must have “strictly ordered” US officials not to speak about it.

The Atlantic Council fellow also found himself in a heated spat with multiple Moscow-based journalists and correspondents last week after he scolded a Washington Post reporter for daring to write an article suggesting that some Ukrainians harbored positive feelings toward Vladimir Lenin. Journalists from the Washington Post, Financial Times and the Guardian were unimpressed that Aslund appeared to be implying that Moscow-based journalists are unable to write authoritatively about Ukraine and that they should refrain from criticizing the country, lest it offend him or his group of friends. Russian journalist Alexey Kovalev also waded into the debate to remind Aslund that debate around post-Soviet identity in Ukraine is alive and well, regardless of how he personally feels.

Since the Kerch Strait incident, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko has imposed martial law in the country — a move which could allow him to call off scheduled elections and remain in power. Moscow has accused Kiev of provoking the entire incident to win sympathies in the West and to help Poroshenko remain in office.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

anzha

Senior Member
Registered Member
If the conflict escalates to open war, is there anything Ukraine can do to defend it self? I am totally ignorant of the capabilities they possess, but I cannot imagine they would stand a chance against Russia.

The honest truth is Russia would stomp Ukraine and the West would tut-tut, tell Russia it was being bad and slap sanctions on.

Ukraine would make it more expensive than the Russians think it would be. Strelkov, Motorola and Givi found the Ukrainians far more tenacious than they thought possibleand it took the intervention of the Russian army to save their William Walker-esque filibuster attempt.

The Donbass War the seizure of Crimea has done more to weld Ukraine together as a nation than anything else possibly could have. I used to hear the Left Bankers used to hate and badmouth the Right Bankers. The Crimeans and the Carpathians used to say nastier stuff still. The Russians used to be viewed as family. Well, someone ought to have reminded them of Cain and Abel. The Russians certainly did later.

However, the Russians outgun the Ukrainians in such a huge way, the Ukrainians have no real chance of winning.

*IF*, and only if, Russia did go to war, it would only take up through the Dniepr to the East and swallow everything down south to connect to Transdniestria in Moldova. It would probably take Kiev for historical reasons though. Anyone IDing as Ukrainian would probably get deported to the rump Ukraine.
 
Sunday at 8:49 PM
it's escalated according to Facebook
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

shots fired by the Russians which resulted in Ukrainian ships loosing power and Russian SF boarded and captured them (!?);
two wounded on the Ukrainian side

sorry if I lost anything in translation, yes, I'm upset
now
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

US lawmakers urge Trump to arm Ukraine, break silence on Russian blockade
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle are pressuring U.S. President Donald Trump to take a tougher line on Moscow after an incident at sea between
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which is ratcheting tensions between the two neighbors.

Several lawmakers expressed concerns after the Ukrainian navy
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Russian ships fired on and seized three of its artillery ships Sunday, wounding six Ukrainian crew members. Russia also closed the Kerch Strait, a key waterway between the Azov Sea and Black Sea, placing the two countries the closest they’ve been to open conflict since Moscow annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014.

The incident suggests U.S. and European actions have failed to deter Russian aggression and raised the question whether Trump will attempt to rally allies.

As the conflict unfolded on Sunday, Trump hit European partners with a Twitter attack over NATO burden-sharing: “The European Union, for many years, has taken advantage of us on Trade, and then they don’t live up to their Military commitment through NATO. Things must change fast!"

Though several world leaders have blamed Russian aggression in the incident, Trump seemed reluctant to do so Monday when reporters asked how he felt about the clash. Trump said, “not good. Not happy about it at all,” adding, “we do not like what’s happening either way. And hopefully it will get straightened out.”

On Monday, the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s ranking member, Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., said Trump was sending the wrong message, that NATO is divided and unwilling to react, just as Russian President Vladimir Putin is testing its resolve.

Engel, likely to become the committee chairman when the House comes under Democratic control in January, called for a unified and forceful response from the U.S. and its allies, short of war.

“We have to work with our allies in the NATO alliance, and what bothers me is President Trump has trashed the NATO alliance,” Engel told Defense News on Monday. “It’s very difficult when you have the president cozying up to Putin once again, not having a very strong response so far — letting Putin think there will be a lot of handwringing and talk, but not a lot of action.”

“I think it was pretty poor taste and timing for the president to issue a statement about burden-sharing at a time when Russian expansion is full blown,” Engel added. “That sends a message to Russia that we’re thrashing our allies and not going to be willing to work in tandem with them and the NATO alliance.”

Engel also repeated his support for sending Ukraine defensive weaponry, which could make Putin reconsider engaging in aggression.

“If Putin starts seeing Russian soldier fatalities, that changes his equation,” Engel said.

Spain and Germany on Monday joined European Union calls on Russia to release Ukrainian sailors and ships, while U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley — during a United Nations Security Council meeting Monday — called on Russia to “immediately cease its unlawful conduct” in the Black Sea.

Russia, meanwhile, called Ukraine’s actions “dangerous” and said the three Ukrainian vessels illegally crossed into Russian waters.

Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., threatened new sanctions on Russia, and called for a coordinated response between the U.S. and its European allies.

“If Putin continues his Black Sea bullying, the United States and Europe must consider imposing additional sanctions on Russia, inserting a greater U.S. and NATO presence in the Black Sea region and increasing military assistance for Ukraine, as called for in the [2018 defense policy law],” Inhofe said in a statement Monday.

Congress authorized the government to provide Ukraine with air defense and coastal defense radars, naval mine and countermine capabilities, and littoral-zone and coastal defense vessels as part of the 2018 defense policy bill.

That legislation was a response to Ukraine losing two-thirds of its naval fleet, which mostly was based in Sevastopol when Russia annexed Crimea.

Ukraine has approximately 71 combat aircraft — older Su-27s and MiG-29s, according to the “Military Balance 2018” of the International Institute for Strategic Studies — and no modern air defense system it might have used to contest Russian actions over the Kerch strait. Its navy is less equipped — one frigate, 10 other surface combatants — and in no shape to challenge Russian dominance of Kerch.

“A new Russian use of force may not compel Trump to respond, but it could energize Congressional efforts to outflank him with additional Russian sanctions,” Byron Callan, a defense sector analyst for Capital Alpha Partners, said in a note to investors. “There is not much time left in the lame duck session of Congress, but these efforts could gain new life in January-February.”

...
... goes on below due to size limit
 
Top