Potential PLANAF Carrier Aviation Alternatives

caksz

New Member
Huge stress is exerted on the airframe during arrested landing. Slamming down on the deck and being grabbed by a cable and pulled up short like that is violent and adds huge stress. So, they would still need big structural changes...much stiffer landing gear for starters.

i forgot about the arrested landing :p , thanks
 

Sea Dog

Junior Member
VIP Professional
I'm intrigued with the potential for JH-7 to be navalized. It is a big aircraft. I've seen that posted. It does provide an excellent naval strike capability. Definitely has the avionics and weapons. But what about weight and space considerations?
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
In Varyag case, it would be hopless attempt. The STOBAR configuration needs good STOL cabability in order to take off using the ski-jump and JH-7 just simply doesen't have the required performance. The biggest lag is the needed thrust. Like it's western counterpart Tornado IDS, it's engines (Spey MK. 202) provides just enough thrust needed for interdiction work. Taking off from the Ski-jump of Varyag needs pretty much thrust-to weight ratio being over 1 so with the JH-7 could only take off without any armament and only limited fuel...not exactly usefull for military purposes...
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
Can someone tell me why has the kuznetsov class been designed in such a way that planes start their take off relatively close to bow of the ship? Wouldn't their max take off weight figure go up if they had a longer run before hitting the ski jump? Sure, it'd probably prevent simultaneous take off and landing procedures but added range/weapons on planes would be more than worth it, no?
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Well there is a third takeoff spot in Kuznetsov, which is ment for heavier load aircrafts. It's located were the blue rounder indicates in this following pic:

kuzneya2.jpg


Now remember that the Kuznetsov had it's skijump intended for the VSTOL use only, the conventional Su-33s and MiG-29Ks became in to the picture later on. The STOBAR in generally is just russian excuse for the current situation. Kuznetsov was never intended to use it's Skijump as a main launcher for non-VSTOL planes, only the cirqumstances made it possiple. As the concept works (someways) they are now marketing it as a cheap alternative to CATOBAR. However it's suitability to non-VSTOL planes is very limited and it will force the planes using it to sacrifice their playload in order to just get airbrone. There is no need to specualte wheter this plane or that plane could be added to the PLANs future carrierwings becouse frankly only very hihg performance modern 4th generation fighters like Su-33 can use the STOBAR system even adeqautly usefully and even so it have to make sacrifices which it wouldn't have to make with CATOBAR.
 

Sczepan

Senior Member
VIP Professional
China intends to buy Russia's Su-33 fighters

01/11/2006 13:15 ZHUHAI (China), November 1 (RIA Novosti) -


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




China intends to purchase Su-33 Naval Flanker ship-borne fighters from Russia, but negotiations on this issue are still at the preliminary stage, a government official said Wednesday at China's largest air show.



Alexander Denisov, a high-ranking military and technical official, is heading Russia's delegation at Airshow China 2006. The huge five-day exhibition which began Tuesday at Zhuhai, near Hong Kong, has attracted aircraft makers from 18 countries, seeking lucrative contracts on the booming Chinese market.



Denisov said, "Each party has the right to purchase what it needs to protect its national interests, and the Chinese side intends to buy Su-33 aircraft; but negotiations are still at the preliminary stage." "Russia is ready to supply all armaments and hardware its enterprises are developing, and will hold negotiations, if the Chinese side expresses such a wish," Denisov said.
However, the official denied media reports claiming that Russia has sold, or intends to sell, Su-27 Flanker fighters to Taiwan.



More than 50 Russian defense companies, including Sukhoi and MiG, are presenting fighter planes, helicopters, and military technology at the air show in China, along with civilian aircraft makers. Aircraft maker Tupolev said it expects to sell two cargo planes to China this year and three next year, while Ilyushin said it plans to deliver at least three planes at the end of 2008.



Alexander Denisov said Russia is ready to help China design an aircraft carrier if asked. "Such a request would not contradict any international agreements or rules. Such cooperation is possible," he said. Chinese media have previously discussed building an aircraft carrier, claiming that China could use the former Soviet carrier Varyag, which was sold to China in the late 1990s, as a basis to design its own model. However, China's military have repeatedly denied the country's plans to build an aircraft carrier
 

Sczepan

Senior Member
VIP Professional
China don't have much experience in carrier start and landing;
so the first steps should be done by cheap, low cost trainers - and the twin-engined L-15 is the only possible chinese trainer to teach and get carrier-licence;
...
the L-15 looks very similiar to russians Yak-130,
- see posting of tphuang at http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/showthread.php?t=495&page=3, postet 04-02-2006
variants of the Yak-130 being considered include a navalised carrier-based trainer aircraft, a lightweight reconnaissance aircraft and an unmanned strike aircraft.
- see
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

yak-130m.jpg

so I become more and more the feeling, that L-15 will be the first PLAN trainer to be used by future carrier pilots
l1534vz.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Yak-130_2006031410594220233600.jpg
    Yak-130_2006031410594220233600.jpg
    48.2 KB · Views: 14
  • L-15-200644705260ky.jpg
    L-15-200644705260ky.jpg
    82.4 KB · Views: 17
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Yes, I know this is the third attempt with the same question, but as here are more guys, which are more familiar with Chinese carrier developments and projects I try it here again ! :D

Any idea what's that :confused: .... just a modeller's dream or a real long-dead project ??? (found at the secret-projects page posted by rousseau) !! … it clearly shows a tail-hook and folding wings !

chineseplanfighter1gq8.jpg


Another one here:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Besides, at the Key-forum "TinWing" mentioned:

Deino, both of these concepts remind me of the Brough P.163 lightweight fighter study of 1981?
...
It is entirely possible that the British might have pitched a lightweight fighter design concept to the Chinese in this era. It is a documented fact that BAe marketed lightweight fighter concepts to both Sweden and India from 1982 onward, so it is conceivable that this very conventional concept might have been pitched to the Chinese a year or so earlier. It seems peculiar that the events in Tiananmen Square completely changed the west's view of China as a potential defense customer, but pre-1989 China was viewed as an ally.


Another idea was a lightweight fighter concept maybe from Shenyang (maybe developed out of the original J-11 Mirage F1-look-alike, but as it had quite a different design and regarding the PL-8 on it's fin I'm not sure if this has to be a later design !

Regarding "No carrier fighter design" it clearly shows a tail-hook and folding wings !


Thanks in advance, Deino
 
Top