Japan Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

,,, even though Central Obamastan is a LONG WAY from the threat, I myself personally very much appreciate our Japanese partner's, I appreciate our Taiwanese partners as well, in fact I am very personally appreciative, thank you for your strategic partnership!

...
Brother there's a reason to station 50k US troops and the 7th Fleet in Japan, and personally I wouldn't call this reason "strategic partnership"

I've read Clancy's Debt of Honor, you know
 

Janiz

Senior Member
Brother there's a reason to station 50k US troops and the 7th Fleet in Japan, and personally I wouldn't call this reason "strategic partnership"
You should restrain your posts in this thread to the bare articles which could be interesting. Other than that there's no value added in the rest of your posts here...
 
You should restrain your posts in this thread to the bare articles which could be interesting. Other than that there's no value added in the rest of your posts here...
LOL I guess one of your rights protected by the First Amendment is the freedom of speech, which you have now exercised
 

Skywatcher

Captain
August 23, 2018

Lockheed offers Japan majority of work in plan for new fighter jet
The upgraded version of the F-22 would incorporate advanced features

TOKYO -- Lockheed Martin has proposed that Japanese companies be responsible for more than half of the development and production of a next-generation fighter jet that Japan wants to introduce in 2030, Nikkei learned Wednesday.


Lockheed is offering Japan an upgraded version of the existing F-22. The U.S. currently bans exports of the plane known as "the Raptor," which is considered the world's most powerful fighter, has stealth capabilities and is armed with eight air-to-air missiles.


The U.S. aircraft manufacturer's decision to open the production to Japan comes out of the belief that there is little risk of technology leaks. The company also says providing the jet to Japan would contribute to the security of Asia. If the share of work pans out as proposed, it would strengthen Japan's defense industry and the Japan-U.S. alliance.


Lockheed's proposal comes in response to concerns in Japan that American companies might monopolize the development and production of the upgraded warplane, leaving little room for Japanese partners' involvement. The company calls the plan a Japan-led framework.


The next-generation fighter will replace Japan's F-2 jets, scheduled to retire around 2030. Tokyo initially looked for ways for Japan Inc. to completely develop a successor on its own, hoping to boost the domestic defense industry's orders, but the idea proved unfeasible due to technological and cost hurdles.


The Japanese government sees Lockheed's proposal, which could deliver high performance at reduced development costs, as the most promising alternative.


The next-generation fighter program is estimated to cost about 6 trillion yen ($54.2 billion), including development, acquisition and maintenance. Some voices are citing a need to update the F-22, which has been deployed since around 2000, and Lockheed's plan has the benefit of lowering upgrade costs shouldered by the U.S.


Although Japan produced 60% of the jointly developed F-2, the U.S. handled engine development since Japan did not have the basic technology at the time. But Lockheed has expressed a willingness this time to shift development and production of new engines to major Japanese heavy machinery maker IHI in the future. If IHI's XF9-1 jet engine is adopted, Japanese companies could be responsible for more than 60% of the total work.


In addition, the exports of high--margin military equipment for the project could ease the U.S. trade deficit with Japan.


Mitsubishi Electric's fighter jet electronics system could be adopted, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries will handle the development and production of wings, according to the plan. The aircraft's body, engines and the fighter system are to be made in the U.S., but Lockheed intends to use more Japanese-made components, incorporating them gradually until Japanese companies play a central role in development.


To hasten development, Lockheed will send Japan F-22s that have not been deployed by the U.S. Air Force so that it can grasp its performance in advance.


The updates will improve the plane's main wings and allow more fuel to be loaded, increasing the jet's range to about 2,200 km so it can be used to defend isolated islands and other missions.


Although the F-22 has the most advanced stealth abilities in the world, it requires a special coating that is laborious to maintain. Maintenance will be simplified by using the same material as the F-35 stealth fighter, making it easier to perform drills and deploy for battle.


One challenge is the cost. Lockheed estimates the price of the next-generation fighter will be far higher than the F-35's 15 billion yen-per-jet price tag. Lockheed estimates the price of a next-generation F-22 at about 24 billion yen if it is part of an order of 70 aircraft. Producing 140 of the jets could reduce the unit price to about 21 billion yen.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
And what's the IOC on that thing going to be?
 

Skywatcher

Captain
And you do realize that training and maintenance are one of the most costly requirements in operating a CVBG which was the original discussion?
As for R&D of drones, read the link;

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It's a dated report on JASDF research on the matter .
Consider how much they have accomplished after 14 years in R&D.
The present Izumo or Kaga can be converted easily to accommodate the TACOM type drones.
They may become more larger in size to be armed with two SRAAM and maybe guns but that would not make it bigger than any manned fixed wing fighter.
As for number of maintenance personnel, it will not become more then triple the amount of present personnel that are presently stationed handling helicopters. The number includes the personnel who will manage ground operation in preparing the drones on the launch pads for launch and retrieval.
Did you even read that paper?!

And what proof do you have of Japanese UCAV progress after 14 years! (and actual evidence mind you, like a serious research program)

It's talking about an air launched drone. A UCAV launched off a carrier is a completely different animal! That's like saying that since Iran can build subsonic LACMs, that they therefore can build a Global Hawk drone 14 years from now.

At the end, you're going back to the same place; what will Japan trade off in order to get CVGs (and note the need for multiple carrier groups).
 

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Did you even read that paper?!

And what proof do you have of Japanese UCAV progress after 14 years! (and actual evidence mind you, like a serious research program)

It's talking about an air launched drone. A UCAV launched off a carrier is a completely different animal! That's like saying that since Iran can build subsonic LACMs, that they therefore can build a Global Hawk drone 14 years from now.

At the end, you're going back to the same place; what will Japan trade off in order to get CVGs (and note the need for multiple carrier groups).
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

aonestudio

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Japanese defence White Paper 2018 (ENG)

g54nrKB.jpg


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
So you base your opinions based on thriller novels.

How quaint . LoL
Art Imitates Life,
no?

actually you reminded me I meant to purchase
The Great Pacific War Hardcover – August 1, 1991
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


so that I can read it once I retire, gosh almost twenty years to go LOL

(OK the context for those who wouldn't know: that's a book which Isoroku Yamamoto read carefully)
 
Top