Cost savings from not flushing!

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please fasten your seatbelt and cross your legs..

1 hour, 39 minutes ago

BEIJING (Reuters) - A Chinese airline has calculated that it takes a liter of fuel to flush the toilet at 30,000 feet and is urging passengers to go to the bathroom before they board.

As Chinese airlines come under increasing pressure to cut fuel expenditures, China Southern's latest strategy is to encourage passengers "to spend their pennies before boarding the aircraft," Xinhua news agency reported Thursday.

"The energy used in one flush is enough for an economical car to run at least 10 kilometers," Captain Liu Zhiyuan, who flies regularly between Hangzhou and Beijing, was quoted as saying.

Citing a survey by the company's logistics department, Liu said carrying one kilogram of items such as blankets and pillows by air for one hour uses 0.2 kg of fuel.

"This means the blankets and pillows on board the aircraft eat up 60 tonnes of fuel every day. If each seat is loaded with three 450-gram magazines, another 60 tonnes will be consumed," Liu explained.

Another cost-saving technique will keep 47 million yuan ($6 million) a year in the airline's coffers, Xinhua said.

"The company has asked logistics staff to fill the water tank only 60 percent full."

In the first half of the year, the "aggregated loss" of Chinese airlines was estimated at around 3 billion yuan, Xinhua said.
 
D

Deleted member 675

Guest
"The company has asked logistics staff to fill the water tank only 60 percent full."

So does that mean if you need to use the toilet, there's no guarantee the person before you will have been able to flush? Eww.....nasty!

Still I'm not going to complain about policies which are going to help the environment, even if the primary concern seems to be the airlines' financial status.
 

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
This might be a bit far fetched, but what's the likelyhood that the PRC domestic airlines might start charging passengers by base ticket price + weight? It could start with your carry-on luggage, then expand to luggage + body weight...
 

RedMercury

Junior Member
Or pay-per-use lavatories, just like the pay-per-use public bathrooms. Hey, if self-interest is the motto of the day, incentive-compatible is the way to go!
 

Big-E

Bug Driver
VIP Professional
You can tell China Southern to kiss my butt... if I have to go I have to go. I think paying 1,000s of dollars for an overpriced ticket earns me my soda and toilet flush. :nono:
 

The_Zergling

Junior Member
You can tell China Southern to kiss my butt... if I have to go I have to go. I think paying 1,000s of dollars for an overpriced ticket earns me my soda and toilet flush. :nono:

I'd say it's precisely because it's unhealthy for people to hold on when they really have to go that the airline suggested that when possible go BEFORe getting onto the plane. It makes perfect economical sense. Of course, people differ in foresight and digestion, so anything more than suggestion would probably face a strong backlash.
 

wanderingmind

New Member
This might be a bit far fetched, but what's the likelyhood that the PRC domestic airlines might start charging passengers by base ticket price + weight? It could start with your carry-on luggage, then expand to luggage + body weight...

Amen to that! And when you're a lardbutt like me...:eek:

I'd have to switch to the Yangtze river ferry... Or a slow boat to China... Or something like that... As long as they don't start charging for displacement... :)

Oh, and Zergling? Hope you never get ulcerative colitis...
 
Last edited:
Top