antiterror13
Brigadier
I don't think in Chinese interest that NK have a nuke
China's strategy in Korean peninsula
- Thread starter Phead128
- Start date
I don't think in Chinese interest that NK have a nuke
I'm sorry, but you may as well not reply if you cannot have a civil debate about something you don't agree with, all you did was insult me, you didn't even refute my argument at all, which makes it even more valid. 再见傻逼!
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
China's not the only country with nuclear tech, as a matter of fact, China's not even the only country the borders NK with nuclear tech. If China helped them, they wouldn't take nearly so long to develop advanced ICBMs that can reach the US.
Let's think about that now... (not that anything in your posts indicates that you can think) why would China want a buffer zone?... Why would a country want a buffer zone against a global terrorist military trying to encroach on its doorstep?
To be honest, land warfare is China's forte; if it were reversed and China stationed 10 million reserve troops in Mexico, the US would probably have nukes on panic trigger aimed at the area including parts of Texas. Once again, NK is denied a reunion and a modern economy because a nosy old superpower desperately clinging to power sent its troops 10,000 miles away from home to try to impede the development of the next rising superpower. The US is the only reason that NK is the rogue regime that it is.
Last edited:
You misspelt "stupid."
but you may as well not reply if you cannot have a civil debate about something you don't agree with, all you did was insult me, you didn't even refute my argument at all, which makes it even more valid. 再见傻逼!
You didn't start a debate, lmao. You threw out an assertion that came from your ass.
That's not a debate, that's called crap-slinging, which is fitting conduct for you, I suppose. However, I must congratulate you on being the first chimpanzee capable of operating a computer.
There are no governmental or non-governmental organizations anywhere in the world that so much as suggest that the NK nuclear programme was aided by the PRC; their nuclear (power) programme was first developed in the 1960s with USSR assistance, which was only after the US deployed nuclear weapons in ROK, and has since been indigenously weaponised. NK was not a starving wasteland before the 1990s that you seem to think it was. The DPRK was more developed than both China and SK in the 60s and 70s.
If NK is a PRC puppet, how do you explain the purge of the Yanan Faction by Kim Il-Sung? How do you explain the purge of the most important ally of China in NK, Jang Song-thaek and his followers? If you think that your Western tabloid world-view can stand up to scrutiny then please present a reliable source. How do explain the repeated insults traded between PRC and DPRK state media?
LoL you slam me for having a Western tabloid view then you link to said unreliable "Western Tabloids ".
Simple. Even westerners don't indulge in your fantasy.
supercat
Major
It's not evidence just because you think something is obvious.
You should blame the British Empire, Imperial Japan, and a bunch of other Western imperialists that invaded and carved up China instead. Their past behavior in China was the real reason that China refused to allow the so-called UN troops to occupy North Korean. During the Cold War, the relationship between China and North Korea actually deteriorated, and Soviet Union became a major sponsor of North Korea. China herself was also under Western embargo until late 1970s. So you should blame the Cold War for North Korea's backwardness until early 1990s. After the Cold War, without China's assistance, North Korean would go hungry and cold. Accusing China for North Korea being a Hermit Kingdom is like biting the hand that feeds her.
