France Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

according to DefenseNews French deal with Nexter, Texelis to provide ‘operational superiority’
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The French armed forces minister announced Monday a contract
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and Texelis for the development, production and service of a Light VBMR troop carrier, with more than 2,000 armored vehicles to be built by 2030.

“The contract awarded by the Direction Générale de l’Armement (DGA) includes development, manufacture and maintenance of this new vehicle for the Army,” the Armed Forces Ministry said in a statement. The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
law forecasts a fleet of more than 2,000 Light VBMRs by 2030, of which 689 are to be delivered by 2025.

Florence Parly had announced the result of a closely watched tender on her visit to the Nexter factory at Roanne, central France.

That contract for Nexter and Texelis was estimated to be worth some €1.2-1.3 billion (U.S. $1.5-1.6 billion), according to a defense executive, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Nexter will supply the armored chassis, while Texelis will ship axles and drive trains for mobility packages.

There will be separate contracts for
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Thales will supply the Antares opto-electronic system for situational awareness, while RTD will provide remote weapon systems with machine guns, the executive said. That will be government-furnished equipment shipped to Nexter for fitting into the vehicles.

The total value of the Light VBMR program could be some €2 billion, the executive said.

Modernization ‘turning point’

The 15-ton, four-wheel drive vehicle will carry 10 soldiers equipped with the Felin infantry kit, the ministry said. There will be four main versions: patrol; intelligence and reconnaissance; tactical communications post; and electronic warfare.

First delivery of the patrol version is due in four years, the ministry said. The vehicles will also be equipped with the Scorpion Combat Information System (a part of the Scorpion program) information and communication system, which plugs them into an overall network. There will also be ambulance versions in the order.

The vehicles will be “fully French-made” and boost jobs in the Roanne region and the engineering offices, Nexter said in a statement. The Light VBMR will be built at the Roanne plant alongside the Griffon multirole troop carrier and Jaguar combat and reconnaissance vehicle.

“The signature of this notification marks a turning point in the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of the land forces and will contribute directly to the preservation of their operational superiority in all places and situations” the ministry said.

“With this contract, Nexter is reinforcing its presence within the Scorpion program and strengthening its position as the reference player in the field of land armament,” said Stéphane Mayer, Nexter’s chairman and CEO.

“The decision of the DGA and the partnership with Nexter strengthens and confirms our strategy to be specialists in wheeled armored vehicle and public transport mobility,” said Charles-Antoine de Barbuat, the CEO of Texelis.

The Light VBMR will partly replace the aging fleet of VAB troop carriers, which have been further used in the Barkhane mission in the African Sahel region.
looking at the picture inside:
6UDD4EPXNVH4TIUHUJYESQHMRI.jpg

An artist's rendering of the Light VBMR. (Nexter)
wonder if it's armored at all
 
Today at 5:12 PM
according to DefenseNews French deal with Nexter, Texelis to provide ‘operational superiority’
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


looking at the picture inside:
6UDD4EPXNVH4TIUHUJYESQHMRI.jpg


wonder if it's armored at all
... actually it looks like an SUV to me LOL!
OK now some hype:
Ever heard of Texelis? The French firm thinks you will.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Texelis expects a large export boost for its vehicle chassis business after being
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for troop carriers for the French Army, the company’s business development director, Jean Vandel, has told Defense News.

The privately owned company, which builds drivelines and axles, signed Monday
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
a contract to develop and build the Light VBMR, a four-wheel drive armored vehicle for the Army’s intelligence and reconnaissance units.

That was a high-profile deal as armed forces minister, Florence Parly, procurement chief Joel Barre and Army Gen. Bernard Barrera attended the signing at Roanne, central France.

“Our aim is to have more than half turnover from exports,” Vandel said. The French Army is well-respected, so winning that contract grants the company a “flagship” for foreign markets.

That deal will help the company compete with the main supplier in the world market, Unimog, he said. “We intend to come to this market with a brand-new level of technology.”

Signing the deal makes Texelis to a joint prime contractor, bearing the company’s hopes of becoming a brand name. The company was previously a subcontractor, supplying drivelines for the French VAB troop carrier and VBCI infantry fighting vehicle.

The company will supply “everything that enables the vehicle to move — everything between the engine and the wheels,” he said.

That includes the driveline, steering system and dashboard in the full “mobility” package, he said. The contract runs for 15 years and builds a direct link between the Armed Forces Ministry and the company.

Texelis’ chassis contribution accounts for about a third of the contract value, with Nexter receiving a third for the armored hull and Thales a third for onboard electronics, Vandel said.

The contract is expected to bring in annual sales of €15-20 million (U.S. $18-25 million) from 2020, he said. The company forecasts 2018 sales of some €100 million, up from €72 million last year. Profit is expected to be 5-8 percent of turnover.

Defense will account for €45 million of sales, with the rest from civil business including €48 million from rail equipment, he said.

The company is recruiting some 30 staff for development, and it plans to hire a similar number when serial production starts in 2021. The company employed 310 staff last year.

There is a “challenging” schedule with three years for development, he noted. The deal sets 689 as the minimum number of units ordered by 2025, with a total of 2,050 by 2030.

An industry source said Soframe teamed with Safran to bid in the tender. Other bidders included Ineo and Renault Trucks Defense.

Texelis was spun off
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in 2009, when Philippe Frantz, a businessman in Limoges, beat three competing bids and became the main shareholder, business daily Les Echos reported.
 
google translation of
Les négociations pour la vente de Rafale supplémentaires entre la France et l’Égypte sont freinées par les États-Unis. Washington refuse l'exportation d'un composant américain à bord du missile de croisière Scalp que Le Caire souhaite acquérir.
Ça coince sérieusement dans les négociations entre Paris et Le Caire pour la vente de Rafale supplémentaires (12 avions de combat) à l'armée de l'air égyptienne, selon des sources concordantes. Et ce n'est pas une question de financement comme par le passé. Selon ces mêmes sources, la France se trouve actuellement dans l'impossibilité de livrer des missiles de croisière Scalp fabriqués par MBDA aux égyptiens en raison d'un composant... américain. Contactés par La Tribune, Dassault Aviation et MBDA se sont refusés à tout commentaire.

Paris avait pourtant accordé le feu vert à l'exportation du missile Scalp à l'issue de son passage devant la commission interministérielle pour l'étude des exportations de matériels de guerre (CIEEMG), mais les États-Unis bloquent la vente. Washington applique la réglementation ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations). De bonne guerre pour les américains. Mais cette situation irrite fortement aussi bien les Égyptiens, qui veulent absolument les missiles Scalp, que Dassault Aviation, qui ne veut pas rater une nouvelle vente de Rafale.
Vers un nouvel arrangement franco-américain?

Si la fourniture de Rafale n'est pas en danger, explique-t-on à La Tribune, cette opération est nettement freinée en dépit des allers et venues fréquentes entre Paris et Le Caire des négociateurs égyptiens et français ces dernières semaines. Et toute la pression pèse sur MBDA, qui est dans le viseur des autorités égyptiennes, très remontées contre le missilier. A tel point que Le Caire souhaite les Scalp... gratuitement. Ce que refuse MBDA. Pourtant, fin 2017, tout semblait être en place pour une signature entre Le Caire et Dassault Aviation en tout début de cette année au moment d'une visite d'Emmanuel Macron. C'est raté.

Soit MBDA change ce composant, soit la France et les États-Unis trouvent un arrangement à très haut niveau. A l'invitation de Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron doit d'ailleurs se rendre aux États-Unis les 23 et 24 avril prochains. Il faut se souvenir que la visite de François Hollande aux États-Unis en février 2014 avait déjà permis de régler la vente de deux satellites espions aux Émirats Arabes Unis (EAU). Les États-Unis refusaient alors d'exporter certains des composants "made in USA" nécessaires à la fabrication de ces deux satellites.
Rafale en Egypte : les Etats-Unis bloquent
16/02/2018
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

:

"Negotiations for the sale of additional Rafale between France and Egypt are hampered by the United States. Washington refuses to export an American component aboard the Scalp cruise missile that Cairo wants to acquire.
It stuck seriously in negotiations between Paris and Cairo for the sale of additional Rafale (12 fighter planes) to the Egyptian Air Force, according to concordant sources. And this is not a funding issue as in the past. According to these sources, France is currently unable to deliver scalp cruise missiles manufactured by MBDA to Egyptians because of an American component. Contacted by La Tribune, Dassault Aviation and MBDA declined to comment.

Paris had given the green light to export the Scalp missile after its passage before the inter-ministerial commission for the study of exports of war materials (CIEEMG), but the United States blocked the sale. Washington follows the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). Good war for the Americans. But this situation greatly irritates both the Egyptians, who absolutely want Scalp missiles, and Dassault Aviation, who does not want to miss a new Rafale sale.
Towards a new Franco-American arrangement?

If the supply of Rafale is not in danger, one explains to the Tribune, this operation is clearly slowed down in spite of the frequent comings and goings between Paris and Cairo of the Egyptian and French negotiators these last weeks. And all the pressure is on MBDA, which is in the sight of the Egyptian authorities, very up against the missile. So much so that Cairo wants the Scalp ... for free. What MBDA refuses. However, by the end of 2017, everything seemed to be in place for a signing between Cairo and Dassault Aviation at the beginning of this year at the time of a visit by Emmanuel Macron. It missed.

Either MBDA changes this component, or France and the United States find an arrangement at very high level. At the invitation of Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron will also visit the United States on 23 and 24 April. It should be remembered that François Hollande's visit to the United States in February 2014 had already settled the sale of two spy satellites in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The United States then refused to export some of the "made in USA" components needed to manufacture these two satellites."
 
this is interesting:
France, US are negotiating ISR capability for Reaper drones, official reveals
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

French and U.S. officials are conducting highly sensitive talks about fitting an intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance pod on medium-altitude, long-endurance Reaper
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
ordered by the French Air Force, an Armed Forces Ministry official said.

The discussions are taking a methodical pace because the subject of off-the-shelf ISR payloads and issues such as where UAVs can fly are
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the official noted Feb. 21.

That acquisition of a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and other planned orders are part of a French Air Force modernization effort set out in the recently announced 2019-2025 military budget law.

The ISR pods would be fitted on the last six General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper Block 5 drones ordered by France. The Reapers are due to be delivered next year.

The first six French Reapers ordered by France will be upgraded to Block 5.

France will arm the Reapers, which will initially carry the Hellfire missile, the official said. Later, the UAVs will be armed with European weapons including Brimstone and MMP missiles.

The French Air Force flies Reapers from the Niamey air base, Niger, in support of the Barkhane mission across the vast Sahel sub-Saharan region. One of the Reapers is used for training at the Cognac air base, southwestern France.

Projects with neighbors

Britain’s stance on reconnaissance contrasts with France, as the former considers a drone
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
more of a priority. This disagreement, along with
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, may explain Britain’s wariness about a plan for an Anglo-French prototype combat drone, dubbed the Future Combat Air System—Development Program, the official said.

Nonetheless, France is committed to the combat drone project, which promotes strong bilateral cooperation with the U.K., the official added. French officials are working on identifying technology areas such as internet connectivity, radar and cybersecurity, with a view to proposing areas of cooperation at a ministerial meeting in April.

France is also pursuing a European MALE UAV project with Germany, Spain and Italy.

This project is seen as emblematic of European defense — too big to fail, the official explained.

Paris plans to order 24 units.
 
Feb 18, 2018
google translation of
Rafale en Egypte : les Etats-Unis bloquent
16/02/2018
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

:

"Negotiations for the sale of additional Rafale between France and Egypt are hampered by the United States. Washington refuses to export an American component aboard the Scalp cruise missile that Cairo wants to acquire.
It stuck seriously in negotiations between Paris and Cairo for the sale of additional Rafale (12 fighter planes) to the Egyptian Air Force, according to concordant sources. And this is not a funding issue as in the past. According to these sources, France is currently unable to deliver scalp cruise missiles manufactured by MBDA to Egyptians because of an American component. Contacted by La Tribune, Dassault Aviation and MBDA declined to comment.

Paris had given the green light to export the Scalp missile after its passage before the inter-ministerial commission for the study of exports of war materials (CIEEMG), but the United States blocked the sale. Washington follows the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). Good war for the Americans. But this situation greatly irritates both the Egyptians, who absolutely want Scalp missiles, and Dassault Aviation, who does not want to miss a new Rafale sale.
Towards a new Franco-American arrangement?

If the supply of Rafale is not in danger, one explains to the Tribune, this operation is clearly slowed down in spite of the frequent comings and goings between Paris and Cairo of the Egyptian and French negotiators these last weeks. And all the pressure is on MBDA, which is in the sight of the Egyptian authorities, very up against the missile. So much so that Cairo wants the Scalp ... for free. What MBDA refuses. However, by the end of 2017, everything seemed to be in place for a signing between Cairo and Dassault Aviation at the beginning of this year at the time of a visit by Emmanuel Macron. It missed.

Either MBDA changes this component, or France and the United States find an arrangement at very high level. At the invitation of Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron will also visit the United States on 23 and 24 April. It should be remembered that François Hollande's visit to the United States in February 2014 had already settled the sale of two spy satellites in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The United States then refused to export some of the "made in USA" components needed to manufacture these two satellites."
related:
Missile sale from France to Egypt depends on US permission, Dassault head says
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The French government must seek U.S. authorization before selling French Scalp cruise missiles with American components to Egypt, said
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Those U.S. parts on the long-range weapon are critical to its ability to function.

Egypt is in talks with France on exercising an option for 12 Rafale fighter jets, business website La Tribune reported. That option was included in a 2015 contract for 24 twin-jet fighters and weapons from Safran and MBDA.

“This is very sensitive,” Trappier said March 8 at a media conference on 2017 financial results. “This is a government-to-government contract. If there are authorizations, then it is up to the government for the component and the government for the aircraft.”

Dassault has delivered 14 of Egypt’s order for 24 Rafale aircraft.

The French Armed Forces Ministry and MBDA declined to comment.

A U.S. State Department official said that “as a matter of policy, we do not comment on private diplomatic exchanges, and we are restricted under federal law from commenting on issues related to specific commercial defense export licensing cases.”

Egypt was the first export client for the Rafale, which was part of a French arms deal that included a Naval Group multimission frigate and four Gowind corvettes, with options for two more. Egypt went on to buy two Mistral helicopter carriers, which France had bought back from Russia.

Previously, France ran into U.S. authorization problems on a 2013 sale of two Falcon Eye spy satellites to the United Arab Emirates. That contract lapsed, as U.S. authorization under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations for two key components was slow. France eventually closed that deal with the UAE in 2014, but only after then-French President François Hollande and then-U.S. President Barack Obama met at the White House and agreed to speed up the authorization.

Dassault expects a down payment from Qatar “shortly” after exercising an option in December for 12 more Rafale fighters, Trappier said. That adds to an initial order for 24 units. Doha also asked for options for 36 more units.

Asked about legal doubt over the French government-to-government offer of the Rafale to Belgium, Trappier said it was simply up to the Belgian government to exercise its national sovereignty, and decide whether to opt out of its fighter competition and pick the Rafale.

The U.S. and Britain have pitched respectively the F-35 and Eurofighter Typhoon in the Belgian tender.

Malaysia is due to hold general elections soon, and Dassault expects to continue talks with the new administration on its offer of the Rafale.

“The discussions will resume with the arrival of the next government,” he said, addressing doubts over Malaysia’s interest in the French fighter following the European Union’s move to curb imports of palm oil. With Britain leaving the EU, Malaysia has signaled a change in interest to the Eurofighter, Reuters reported.

Dassault expects Switzerland to launch a competition soon to replace the F-5 and F-18. The firm has high hopes for the Rafale, the executive said.

A previous Swiss tender picked the Saab Gripen to replace the F-5, but that selection was canceled in a public referendum.

Dassault expects the French government to sign a contract soon for three new Falcon jets for its Epicure airborne universal electronic warfare program, replacing an aging fleet of two Transall Gabriel aircraft. The selection likely will be the 7X or 8X versions of the Falcon twin-engine jets, Trappier said, and the deal will be will be shared with Thales.

Dassault expects Japan will order more Falcon jets for surveillance and electronic warfare on top of the four units already ordered, he said.
 
I'll be putting here google translation of
Syrie : première utilisation du MdCN ?
vendredi 16 mars 2018
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

as I read it:
L'enchaînement des actions militaires en Syrie de la part des protagonistes voit les anti-chambres des chancelleries envisager ouvertement un nouvel emploi coercitif de la force depuis les frappes ordonnées par le président Donald J. Trump (59 missiles Tomahawk, 6 avril 2017). Dans cette perspective, et à nouveau depuis le mois d'août 2013, une action militaire française en coalition, voire autonome - dixit le CEMA -, est de nouveau évoquée. Quelle participation navale est-elle envisageable ?

Il n'est pas question ici de reprendre l'ensemble des éléments pouvant conduire à l'emploi de la force afin d'interdire au régime syrien l'emploi de gaz de combat ou de réduire ses capacités militaires. En tous les cas, il y a fort peu de doutes dans ces lignes sur un emploi de ces gaz alors qu'
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
fait état, une fois encore, d'éléments laissant entendre la reconstitution d'un arsenal chimique malgré l'existence d'un contrôle russe sur la suppression du précédent. Pas plus qu'il ne sera question de l'emploi de tels armes par d'autres protagonistes de ce conflit car ils n'appartiennent pas à l'une des catégories des groupes armées non-étatiques légitimes pour fonder un État et donc participer à l'édiction d'un ordre international.

De manière très modeste, il s'agit de proposer un bref aperçu des capacités navales de frappe françaises en fonction de ce qui est pressenti comma la demande du politique. Le gouvernement semble décidé à donner du crédit aux lignes rouges édictées au sujet de l'emploi d'armes chimiques tout en cherchant une nouvelle porte d'entrée dans le processus diplomatique autour de la guerre civile syrienne, Paris en étant grandement exclu depuis la volte-face de 2013 et l'intervention russe de 2015. Cela revient autant à demander ce qu'il est possible de faire sur le plan militaire et ce qui peut en être attendu sur le plan stratégique.

Le débat porte actuellement sur la puissante mais simple liaison entre la volonté d'édicter des lignes rouges sur le plan diplomatique et de leur crédibilité. Rendre crédible une telle assertion à imposer des lignes rouges à autrui suppose de pouvoir les faire respecter, par la force si besoin était. En 2013, cette crédibilité s'est effondrée. Mais depuis les élections générales dans les pays concernés, les États-Unis affichaient un changement de braquet en procédant à telles frappes le 6 avril 2017. Et la France étudierait la possibilité d'en faire autant en mars 2018, en toute autonomie si besoin était.

Après plus de sept années de guerre civile en Syrie (2011 - ...), les capacités de défense aérienne du régime syrien demeurent largement opérationnelles. Et elles ne sont plus seules puisque l'intervention russe depuis 2015 s'est, notamment, matérialisée par le déploiement côtier d'une bulle de défense aérienne navale ponctuelle à l'
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Ces batteries couvrent largement le territoire syrien, tout particulièrement le régime d'Assad.

Le récent raid israélien du début du mois de février démontrait que ces défenses pouvaient être contournées, voire détruites pour certaines. Cette action matérialise plusieurs problématiques : la présence des systèmes anti-aériens russes imposent, de facto, à les prendre en compte et à négocier une déconfliction aérienne totale ou partielle du ciel syrien. En outre, la suppression de défenses aériennes syriennes en lien avec la réduction des capacités militaires du régime revient à employer une force de frappe mêlant plusieurs capacités opérationnelles. Aussi, c'est prendre et assumer le risque de pertes humaines et matérielles, d'où le nécessaire emploi de capacités de récupération d'équipages (CSAR), ce qui n'enlève pas le risque de capture des équipages. Enfin, chaque système d'arme a un taux d'échec qu'il n'est pas élégant d'avancer sur le plan commercial. Chaque missile de croisière n'atteignant pas sa cible représente autant du pain béni pour la propagande qu'une perte relative de crédibilité militaire qu'une dispersion involontaire de matériaux technologiques.
"The chain of military actions in Syria on the part of the protagonists sees the anti-chambers chancelleries openly consider a new coercive use of force since the strikes ordered by President Donald J. Trump (59 missiles Tomahawk, April 6, 2017). In this perspective, and again since August 2013, a French military action coalition or even autonomous - dixit the CEMA - is again mentioned. What naval participation is it possible?

It is not a question here of taking up all the elements that could lead to the use of force in order to prevent the Syrian regime from using combat gases or reducing its military capabilities. In any case, there is little doubt in these lines on the use of these gases, whereas a new UN report once again makes reference to the evidence of the reconstitution of a chemical arsenal despite the fact that existence of a Russian control over the suppression of the precedent. Nor will there be any mention of the use of such weapons by other protagonists of this conflict because they do not belong to one of the categories of legitimate non-state armed groups to found a State and thus to participate in the enactment of an international order.

In a very modest way, it is a question of proposing a brief overview of the French naval strike capabilities according to what is perceived as the demand of the policy. The government seems determined to give credit to the red lines enacted about the use of chemical weapons while seeking a new gateway to the diplomatic process around the Syrian civil war, Paris being largely excluded since the uprising -face of 2013 and the 2015 Russian intervention. This is tantamount to asking what is possible to do militarily and what can be expected from a strategic point of view.

The debate is currently about the powerful but simple connection between the desire to make red lines on the diplomatic front and their credibility. Making credible such an assertion to impose red lines on others implies being able to enforce them, by force if need be. In 2013, this credibility collapsed. But since the general elections in the countries concerned, the United States showed a change in gear by conducting such strikes on April 6, 2017. And France would study the possibility of doing the same in March 2018, in full autonomy if needed. .

After more than seven years of civil war in Syria (2011 - ...), the air defense capabilities of the Syrian regime remain largely operational. And they are no longer alone since the Russian intervention since 2015 has, in particular, materialized by the coastal deployment of a naval air defense bubble point to the installation of Russian S-400 systems in Syria from 2015 followed by S -300 (S-300V and more?) In 2016. These batteries largely cover the Syrian territory, especially the Assad regime.

The recent Israeli raid in early February showed that these defenses could be bypassed, or even destroyed for some. This action materializes several issues: the presence of Russian anti-aircraft systems impose, de facto, to take them into account and to negotiate a total or partial air deconfliction of the Syrian skies. In addition, the suppression of Syrian air defenses in connection with the reduction of the military capabilities of the regime amounts to employing a strike force combining several operational capabilities. Also, it is to take and assume the risk of human and material losses, hence the necessary use of crew recovery capabilities (CSAR), which does not remove the risk of capturing crews. Finally, each weapon system has a failure rate that is not elegant to advance commercially. Each non-target cruise missile is as much a blessing for propaganda as a relative loss of military credibility as an unintentional dispersal of technological materials."

goes on below ...
 
Top