F-22 Raptor Thread

oh really?
USAF calls for drone defences after F-22 overflight

source is FlightGlobal
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related:
USAF Wants Authority To Down Drones After F-22 Near Miss
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In early July, an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Raptor pilot coming in for a landing just barely avoided colliding with a small, commercial unmanned aerial system (UAS). That same week, a base security guard watched another tiny drone fly onto the complex and over the flight line before heading back out.

In neither case did the airman have the legal authority to shoot down or otherwise disable the drone.

As drone technology becomes cheaper and more commercially available, the U.S. Air Force is increasingly worried about the threats posed by small UAS such as quadcopters. But while the service is developing the tools to defend against these systems—from jamming their electronics to shooting them down—it lacks the legal authority to use them, says Gen. James Holmes, commander of Air Combat Command.

“Imagine a world where somebody flies a couple hundred of those, and flies one down the intake of one of my F-22s with just a small weapon,” Holmes said July 11 during an event on Capitol Hill. “I need the authorities to deal with that.”

Dealing with commercial drones near protected facilities is a complicated legal issue. The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is responsible for all U.S. airspace, and has already established no-fly zones over every U.S. military base so any drone flight there is illegal. But determining when it is OK for the military to disable or destroy UAS that wander into its facilities is still something of a gray area. Outside the Pentagon and FAA, multiple government agencies are involved, including the Department of Homeland Security and even the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which mandates that only government agencies can use jamming against drones.

In particular, the Air Force is concerned about UAS near its nuclear sites—an even more complex issue because the Department of Energy also has a stake.

“We will likely receive authorities to defend the nuclear installations first, and then we will try to work the other ones,” Holmes said. “We need to extend those authorities beyond the nuclear sites to protect our sophisticated assets that we rely on.”

For the FAA, the most immediate concern is UAS flying near busy commercial airports. The agency has tested several different detection systems at several airports, including a CACI International system that can identify both a UAS and its operator in the vicinity of airports.

Meanwhile, UAS in the wrong hands abroad present a different threat. Islamic State militants have begun arming commercial quadcopters with small munitions akin to grenades and deploying them against Iraqi security forces and civilians. The U.S. Army saw many instances of this tactic during the fight to retake Mosul.

Several firms are developing ways to deal with this threat, including Battelle’s “DroneDefender,” a handheld device that uses directed energy to disrupt adversary control of the drone. But this system has not been authorized by the FCC and cannot be sold commercially.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Silicon Valley-style software approach comes to F-35, F-22


  • 07 SEPTEMBER, 2017
  • SOURCE: FLIGHTGLOBAL.COM
  • BY: STEPHEN TRIMBLE
  • WASHINGTON DC


US military and defence industry officials are close to adopting Silicon Valley-style software development and refresh processes for military aircraft, starting with billion-dollar upgrade programmes for the Lockheed Martin F-35 and F-22.

The new strategy could be approved within months as the F-35 joint programme office faces the challenge of fixing bugs in the F-35’s go-to-war Block 3F software and developing the follow-on Block 4 package of capability improvements.

F-35 software planning has entered a “strategic pause” until JPO staffers present a new software development plan for consideration by top Pentagon officials in late October, says F-35 programme executive Vice Adm Mat Winter, speaking at the Defense News Conference on 6 September.

Meanwhile, the “agile” software development technique used by Apple to develop iPhone applications could be adopted by the F-22 programme office, as the US Air Force considers developing a stealthy transmit and receive mode for the Link 16 datalink to communicate with a future unmanned “loyal wingman” and the F-35, says Sean Singleton, director of business development and marketing for the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Unit Experimental (DIUx).

Singleton, speaking on the sidelines of the same conference, says the F-22 SPO and prime contractor Lockheed are open to making the switch, with an eye to accelerating the new datalink capability from 2021 or 2022.

The goal of the new strategy is to circumvent the US military’s costly and time-consuming process that delivers new software in cumbersome blocks, with development cycles often measured in years and frequently delayed. Instead, the new approach breaks new capabilities into smaller increments of software code, allowing developers to deliver some applications months or years faster.

The military aircraft strategy has emerged five months after the USAF issued a stop work order to Northrop Grumman on developing software for Block 10.2 of the Air Operations Center, a network of air warfare command centers around the world. Instead, the USAF started working with DIUx in July to partner with Silicon Valley firms to deliver the same capabilities within a year.

“DIUx will bring the agile methodology that we’ve done with AOC” to military aircraft, Singleton says. “We’re bringing in Silicon Valley into these large weapon systems.”

As the strategy shifts from a ground-based operations centre to aircraft software, programme planners could shift modernisation priorities to account for the impact on airworthiness certification timelines.

In the case of the F-35, the JPO will bring Block 4 capabilities forward that do not have an impact on the airworthiness, centre of gravity or flight dynamics of the fighter, Winter says. Such capabilities include software- and hardware-enabled sensor upgrades, he says. Other improvements, such as adding new weapons that require airworthiness certification, would be implemented later from 2020 to 2022, Winter says.

Lockheed is now on track to deliver the full Block 3F software package by the end of the year, allowing the USAF to begin initial operational test and evaluation on the F-35A next year.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
inside:


"... by the F-22 programme office, as the US Air Force considers developing a stealthy transmit and receive mode for the Link 16 datalink to communicate with a future unmanned “loyal wingman” and the F-35, ..."

what does this STEALTHY LINK-16 combo is supposed to mean??


It means that Raptors can communicate with other Raptors on their own stealthy link, but Link 16 isn't stealthy at present, and Raptors use Link 16 to communicate with the F-35s and in time their 'loyal wingmen", but it is NOT stealthy, so they must develop a stealthy Link 16 for very, very high threat environments.
 
It means that Raptors can communicate with other Raptors on their own stealthy link, but Link 16 isn't stealthy at present, and Raptors use Link 16 to communicate with the F-35s and in time their 'loyal wingmen", but it is NOT stealthy, so they must develop a stealthy Link 16 for very, very high threat environments.
thought "a stealthy Link 16" would be an oxymoron (LOL)
 
Top