American Economics Thread

Equation

Lieutenant General
Stocks are soaring higher today, fueled by out-of-the-park earnings from Caterpillar and McDonald's. Plus another milestone is reached, with the Nasdaq Composite breaching the 6000 mark. Yahoo Finance's Alexis Christoforous is joined by Alan Valdes, director of floor operations at Silverbear, at the New York Stock Exchange to discuss.
:eek:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

delft

Brigadier
Investing in the real US economy is less attractive because politics has fallen into the hands of special interest groups. See: Bas van Bavel - The Invisible Hand? for comparable developments in Iraq in the eight and ninth centuries, North and Middle Italy in the Late Middle Ages, the Netherlands in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
Therefore there is less need for research and development except for military technology and only as long as US can pay for it.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
"Jobs make a comeback, unemployment rate drops to the lowest in a decade"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Some really good numbers for the economy, and Trump deserves credit. Going forward, however, there must be focus on the roughly 94 million people currently out of the workforce. Candidate Trump made a big deal out of that, but President Trump has been relatively muted. Time isn't on America's side in the issue, because Baby Boomers are retiring in droves, and the ratio of workers putting into the social care and security systems vs. people taking out of them is dropping. Things can't continue as it indefinitely.
 
Another win for principle over greed.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


U.S. | Thu May 4, 2017 | 3:42pm EDT
U.S. charges four Chinese nationals in college entrance exam scam

By Nate Raymond | BOSTON
U.S. authorities said on Thursday they arrested four Chinese nationals who were involved in a scheme to falsely take college entrance exams.

Yue Wang, a Chinese student at Hult International Business School in Cambridge, agreed to sit for the TOEFL, the English-language exam widely used to assess foreign applicants, for the trio, federal prosecutors in Boston said.

Shikun Zhang, 24, Leyi Huang, 21, and Xiaomeng Cheng, 21, used the exam scores to gain admission to Northeastern University, Penn State University and Arizona State University, respectively, according to prosecutors.

Zhang, Huang and Cheng paid Wang, 25, nearly $7,000 take the test after they had failed to meet the universities' minimum scores, according to charging documents.

After they were admitted, the three were issued student visas by the U.S. State Department. They face immigration-related charges of conspiring to defraud the United States, prosecutors said.

"By effectively purchasing passing scores, they violated the rules and regulations of the exam, taking spots at U.S. colleges and universities that could have gone to others," William Weinreb, acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, said in a statement.

Wang, who was also in the United States on a student visa, was arrested in New Jersey, while Zhang, Huang and Cheng were arrested in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Arizona, respectively, authorities said.

A lawyer for Zheng did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Lawyers for the other defendants could not be immediately determined.

Amid a growing affluent population, more Chinese students are enrolling in U.S. colleges and universities, attracted by the prospect of a prestigious American education and good jobs.

Their numbers grew by 9 percent to 135,629 students in the 2015-2016 school year, according to the Institute of International Education.

The latest case followed a similar one in 2015 when the U.S. Justice Department charged 15 Chinese nationals in a scheme to pay others to take college entrance exams.

That case stemmed from an investigation by U.S. Homeland Security in Philadelphia. According to court papers, the Boston-based probe stemmed from information developed by that office.

(Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe)
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Interesting opinion piece from the WaPo. It's past time the Trump administration presses for equal treatment of American firms in China as Chinese firms in America. Reciprocation must be more than just a buzzword, and time is running out.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China is bent on world domination — not with its missiles and aircraft carriers, but by controlling solar energy, cloud computing and other industries of the future.

That is an only slightly exaggerated version of a warning coming from the American chamber of commerce in China. It sent a delegation to Washington last week to warn that “China’s aggressive mercantilist policies are one of the most serious threats facing the future of U.S. advanced technology sectors,” as their policy paper says — and that the U.S. government isn’t doing enough to counter the threat.

The warning is especially startling coming from
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, as it calls itself, which for years flexed its advocacy muscle persuading the United States to let China into the world trading system and rebutting Americans who it felt were too hard on China.

“Now we’re saying that things are really lopsided, and the government needs to wake up and take action,” James McGregor, chairman of APCO Worldwide in China and part of last week’s delegation, told me during a visit to The Post. “This is aimed at domination of the industries of the future. We’re talking about artificial intelligence and all the things that are important to the American economy.”

Given President Trump’s anti-China rhetoric during the campaign, you might expect U.S. executives in Beijing and Shanghai to feel optimistic about the prospects for a U.S. response. They are hopeful — but they are also nervous, for reasons I’ll get to in a minute, that the administration may miss this opportunity to course-correct.

Organizers of a Kushner Companies event in Shanghai on May 7 barred journalists from entering the publicly advertised function which offered Chinese investors a chance to get U.S. immigrant visas if they put money into a real estate project linked to Jared Kushner. (Reuters)
First, though: Why has AmCham changed its tune so dramatically since the upbeat days of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
?

The chamber’s answer: China has changed, not us. Its policy has shifted, McGregor said, from “reform and opening” to “reform and closing.” The Communist regime still wants economic growth and market mechanisms, in other words, but without subjecting its economy to open competition from outside. In fact, a recent survey showed that more than 80 percent of the chamber’s members “feel less welcome than before,” another delegation member, Lester Ross of the WilmerHale law firm, told me.

China has a well-developed, long-term industrial strategy, the chamber says. It limits U.S. firms’ access to its market; demands that American companies share their advanced technology to get even that limited access; buys foreign companies that possess technology it needs while preventing U.S. firms from investing in China; shovels resources to Chinese companies as they ramp up; and then, once those Chinese firms have fattened on the vast and protected Chinese market, sends them out to compete in the world.

“The economic relationship is critical to both the United States and China,” said William M. Zarit, a former U.S. diplomat and now senior counselor at the Cohen Group and chairman of AmCham China. “But as strong as it might be, we have an investment and trade relationship that is out of whack. . . . We need to address this.”

During the campaign, Trump
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
China was “ripping us left and right.”

“There are people who wish I wouldn’t refer to China as our enemy,” he wrote in 2015. “But that’s exactly what they are.”

But will his earlier skepticism translate into smart policy?

Since meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump has seemed very taken with the Communist leader and the budding U.S.-China relationship,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
“something very special, something very different than we’ve ever had.”

This could be a prelude, U.S. executives worry, to economic concessions designed to win cooperation on North Korea. They also worry that, to the extent the administration remains focused on the economy, it is on iron, steel and other heavy manufacturing sectors rather than technologies that will be crucial in the future.

Most of all they worry, though, because it wouldn’t be easy for anyone to come up with an intelligent response to the uneven relationship.

“Our systems are fundamentally different,” explained Timothy P. Stratford, a delegation member who worked in the U.S. trade representative’s office from 2005 to 2010. “We follow process. . . . China is focused on outcomes.”

If U.S. law allows a Chinese company to buy an American one, in other words, the U.S. government isn’t going to interfere — even if U.S. firms are being blocked in China and the overall situation seems unfair.

The delegation did not come with detailed policy proposals, though several members called for new levels of review for proposed Chinese investments. Mostly they want a recognition that the Chinese economy is not operating as Americans hoped it would during the push to open the global trading system — and that waiting for it to “evolve” is no longer a viable option.

“The solution has to be some combination of offense and defense,” said Randal L. Phillips, Asia managing partner for the Mintz Group. “China has to face some consequence.”
 

Yvrch

Junior Member
Registered Member
Interesting opinion piece from the WaPo. It's past time the Trump administration presses for equal treatment of American firms in China as Chinese firms in America. Reciprocation must be more than just a buzzword, and time is running out.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I have some time so let's think about this for a moment.
In this supposedly Barron to Cohn transition period, all kinds of tension will inevitably surface, behind the door or in public, in both national and international agendas.

Ross and Mnuchin together called Wang Yang last week. So apparently some give and take are already in play.

Despite Trump's inexperience in policy matters and finer details of governing, there nevertheless is the truth about trade deficits. You can run up fiscal deficits at a steady pace indefinitely, within a reasonable bound of a given gdp growth and inflation. But you can't forever run up trade deficits, as more foreign claims on your gdp pile up and you will end up with ever shrinking portion of gdp for your own. On the other hand, domestic debt are taxable, mostly, and interest payment goes to the grandchildren, so it is more or less in a closed loop, transferring investment money to later generations.

This administration has tons of trade tensions with many trading partners as of now, not just China. Korea, Germany, UK, Japan, Mexico, Canada. You name a country and it is probably in the list.

Will these countries budge to Commerce Dept. pressure? It will be a mixed bag at best. They will make some concessions but definitely not all. They will in turn demand US what makes sense for them.

Of course this administration will claim victory over smallest concessions for the optics and sound bite but it will still be some time for this administration to have a coherent clear strategy with a full team in place.

Trump has shown himself to be a paper tiger. He made threats that he never delivers: NAFTA, border wall, the list goes on. Chinese interlocutors told Trump team not to call Xi on weekly basis regarding North Korea as Xi was unhappy about being treated like a junior official. Don't call me for weekly updates, piss off. LoL.

Obviously, phone went silent.


So can they change China's coherent strategy? Bits and pieces yes. A few percentage points here and there, but not likely any substance.
 

Yvrch

Junior Member
Registered Member
Bits and pieces, but no substance.
Don the paper tiger, the empty suit.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


U.S. Strikes China Trade Deals but Leaves Major Issues Untouched
By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
MAY 11, 2017

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Share This Page
Photo
13chinatrade-1-master768.jpg

A poultry farm in Shandong Province, China, in February. The United States is set to allow Chinese to export cooked poultry products. Credit Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
BEIJING — The United States has reached a set of narrow trade deals with China covering areas like electronic payment services, beef and poultry, Trump administration officials said, leaving untouched bigger issues that could still complicate relations between the two major trading partners.

The disclosure of the deals on Thursday evening — which included an announcement that the United States would be represented at a forum in Beijing devoted to President
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
’s ambitious One Belt, One Road international investment initiative — suggests that the Trump administration is trying to smooth relations with Beijing despite President Trump’s harsh anti-China language on the campaign trail.

Under the newly announced deals, China set a deadline for fulfilling its promises to allow American beef, and said it would speed up considerations of pending American applications to offer bioengineered seeds in China. It will also allow foreign-owned firms to provide credit-rating services in China, issue guidelines to let American firms offer electronic payment services there, and issue licenses to two American financial institutions to underwrite bonds.

The United States, in turn, will allow Chinese to export cooked poultry products. American officials also said that Matthew Pottinger,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, would travel to Beijing with one or more Commerce Department officials for this weekend’s event.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Sending a delegation recognizes the importance of President Xi’s signature foreign policy to build China’s economic, financial and political ties across Asia, the Mideast, Eastern Europe and eastern Africa.

The trade agreements did not address areas such as steel, aluminum or auto parts — areas where Chinese exports have a deep, industrywide impact. Mr. Trump criticized China’s trade practices both before and after the election, saying China was benefiting at the expense of American workers.

The Trump administration has since moderated its language, with Mr. Trump suggesting that China could strike better trade terms
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the United States contain North Korea’s nuclear ambitions.

Chinese officials here had no immediate comment.

Many of these deals were expected. Trade officials in both countries had said they expected a deal on American beef exports, which China has limited for more than a decade over worries about
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Still, while narrow, a number of the agreements announced on Thursday represent a further reversal of American foreign policy from the Obama administration.

The Obama administration long refused to allow Chinese poultry imports, as the Agriculture Department had broad safety concerns about it, including the chemicals the animals are fed and the hygiene at farms and slaughterhouses.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and bird flu are also widespread problems in China, although the germs that cause them should be killed if poultry is properly cooked.

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross praised the deals for providing specific dates for China to act on trade pledges that it has made repeatedly but not fulfilled.

He predicted that Trump administration policies would start to narrow the United States trade deficit with China, which is equal to more than half of the nation’s overall trade deficit.

“By the latter part of the year,” he said, “you should see something.”

Mr. Ross and his negotiators were not able to obtain a deadline for when China would issue approvals for eight kinds of American seeds that have been bioengineered to produce hardier and more productive crops.

On electronic payment services, which have become a popular alternative to cash in China, both sides appeared to make compromises. The Chinese side finally set a date, July 16, for allowing foreign providers of these services b

ut \ would issue further guidelines \ for how they could be offered in China. The Obama administration had said China should allow foreign electronic payment services without issuing further guidelines. The United States had already fought and won a World Trade Organization case against China over payment processing.

In another American concession, the Trump administration agreed that it would not restrict United States exports of liquefied
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to China, though they would still be subject to an overall daily cap. Some American manufacturers, particularly in the energy-hungry chemicals industry, fear China might buy so much American natural gas that the purchases would push up American natural gas prices. The first shipment of American liquefied natural gas to China arrived in southern China’s Guangdong province last August.

On credit-rating services, Joerg Wuttke, the president of the European Chamber of Commerce in China, said on Tuesday in Shanghai that foreign companies were increasingly concerned about such services that are being developed within China. These services appear likely to measure the extent to which companies as well as individuals meet the social and political goals of the Chinese state, he said, and not just whether companies and individuals pay their bills on time.

Jeremie Waterman, the executive director for greater China at the United States Chamber of Commerce, cautiously welcomed the trade deals, while noting that he did not yet have the details. “The administration deserves credit for hopefully ensuring full and timely implementation of commitments China has already made in the areas of beef, biotech, and electronic payments,” he said.
 
Bits and pieces, but no substance.
Don the paper tiger, the empty suit.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


U.S. Strikes China Trade Deals but Leaves Major Issues Untouched

In general it's a good thing that the US and China are willing to further engage and work out their differences. However on a personal level I am very worried that the net effect for US consumers will be both worse quality and higher prices with increased food imports from China to the US and food exports from the US to China.
 

Yvrch

Junior Member
Registered Member
In general it's a good thing that the US and China are willing to further engage and work out their differences. However on a personal level I am very worried that the net effect for US consumers will be both worse quality and higher prices with increased food imports from China to the US and food exports from the US to China.

Could be.
Why my Fuji apples taste funny?
Why am I paying the same for a smaller pack size bacon? LoL.
Hopefully, with stronger dollar and cheaper oil, food inflation shouldn't be that much of a worry.
 
Top