timepass
Brigadier
’s vulnerabilities: Can Pakistan carve a way out?
Since April 2015, China and Pakistan have been endeavoring to complete their joint China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) project. The project is imperative for both states’ sustainable economic growth. Moreover, many Eurasian, Central, and West Asian countries have also expressed their desire to partake in the project. The new membership, certainly, enhances the efficacy of the project. These developments accentuate that the project contains potential to revolutionize the regional commerce and positively contribute in the global trade.
Imperatives for CPEC’s success
According to the estimates the ‘One-Road, One-Belt would establish close land and maritime connections between/among 60-plus countries across Asia and Europe.
CPEC project has the potential to transform the socio-economic landscape of Pakistan. The economic stability is imperative for political stability which not only enhances the internal and external security of the state but also germinates more opportunities for the prosperity of the citizens. Simultaneously, CPEC would contribute constructively to the gradual peaceful rise of China. It would provide Chinese merchants with the shortest and the most secure route to West Asia. China will also get relief from the Malacca strait imbroglio.
Neither the economic stability of Pakistan is acceptable to its regional competitors, nor China’s emergence as a global power is tolerable to many states. They are aware of the potential progressive outcome of the CPEC, which is a flagship project of President Xi Jinping’s “One-Road, One-Belt” vision. According to the estimates, the ‘One-Road, One-Belt would establish close land and maritime connections between/among 60-plus countries across Asia and Europe. This connectivity definitely ushers an era of prosperity for all the members of the project.
provincial and central governments in Pakistan.
It is also negatively propagating that ‘Chinese would sell their cheap products in the Pakistani market, which may cause unemployment as well as the destruction of local industries’. Indeed, cunning treacheries tricks of the fifth column are perilous for the CPEC project as well as hazardous for the economic prosperity of the people of Pakistan.
The American strategic community considers China as an emerging strategic competitor in the current geopolitical landscape of the world. Hence, Asia-Pacific region has become a geostrategic priority for the Pentagon. Obama Administration’s pivot or rebalance strategy in Asia-Pacific was designed in 2011-12 to contain China. In this context, the CPEC reduces Chinese dependence on the South China Sea trade route. Subsequently, it would facilitate China to take firm actions while pursuing its strategic objectives in Asia-Pacific.
Beijing’s counter strategies
Beijing has been developing powerful forces capable of deterring and defeating aggression of any state, including the United States, in the South China Sea. Since 2015, Chinese have been signaling that in the South China Sea, they would not accept external actor’s interference. It seems determined to monitor the navigation operations in the South China Sea and continue developing bases on its Islands in the Sea.
The United States and its like-minded European nations also seemed frustrated with the CPEC. It was reported that almost all the central European states including the United Kingdom, except Italy, would be distancing from a summit organized by Chinese President Xi Jinping on a new Silk Road scheduled in May 2017. The objective of the summit is to advertise the “One Belt, One Road” international credentials and make it less China-centric. The encouraging news is that Presidents of Russian Federation, Philippine, Switzerland, Czech Republic and Prime Ministers of Spain, Greece, Hungary, Serbia and Poland along 28 other leaders will attendant the summit.
Indian anti-CPEC attitude
The Indian ruling elite’s hysterical attitude towards CPEC is alarming. It has been endeavoring to create internal discord in Pakistan. The Indians are cognizant of the fact that once CPEC is implemented; it would change the face of Baluchistan. More precisely, the people of Baluchistan would be its greatest beneficiaries in the long term. Therefore, the Indian intelligence agency, RAW, crafted a network in Baluchistan to obstruct the construction of CPEC infrastructure.
Admittedly, China has maintained impressive bilateral working relations with India. Currently, it is having more than 80 billion US dollar bilateral trade volume with India. Despite having impressive economic relations with Beijing, Premier Modi government is determined to wreck CPEC project because it is in the interest of Pakistan. Moreover, the Indo-US strategic partnership has been receiving a positive response from both Modi government and Trump Administration.
On April 18, 2017, HR McMaster, President Donald Trump’s national security adviser, visited New Delhi to assure Premier Modi to increase defense cooperation. He also promised to support India’s status as a major defense US partner and Indo-Pacific doctrine. The primary objective of the Americans is to build and encourage India to counter China’s increasing significance in Asia. To conclude, the CPEC project would be transforming the global geo-economic landscape. China and Pakistan would be the primary beneficiary of the project. Hence, Beijing and Islamabad ought to be prepared to intelligently encounter the anti-CPEC regional and global challenges.
