ECS ADIZ: it's about sovereignty (CLOSED FOR COOLING OFF)

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

antiterror13

Brigadier
Janiz said:
smh...

Jeff, please do something because such language shouldn't be used even on the Internet forum. Let alone public places.
Click to expand...

how about your tone and language ... much much worse than @Blackstone ... The pot calling the kettle black obviously ... and interesting that you didn't report @SamuraiBlue which is much worse as well :mad:

remember @Janiz .. you have been banned before ... so be careful and watch your behaviours ... do something useful to this forum

and also @Janiz ... please don't lie .... is not accepted here ... leave your "lies" somewhere else :eek:
 
Last edited:
SamuraiBlue

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Blackstone said:
Fantasy? Really? Let's test your theory.
  • Is it fantasy to say China is the second largest economy in the world by all mainstream economic measures, and the largest by one measure? Humm... nope, not fantasy to rational people all over the world.
  • Is it fantasy to say China has greater comprehensive national power than Japan, and the gap grows every year? Let's see now... humm... nope, not fantasy to rational individuals.
  • Is it fantasy to say Japan is a dying country, withering on the vine with an aging population and fewer women having babies? *Checks Japan's own news reports* Oh look, dire reports of Japan going below 90 million people by 2060. So nope, not fantasy.
  • Is it fantasy to say the AIIB is a roaring success, in spite of pleas by Washington to strangle it in the crib? Humm... 57 founding members, EU countries rushing to join, lead by "special relations" UK. Will have over 100 members soon. So nope, can't call that fantasy.
  • Is it fantasy to say China's Belt and Road Initiative is off on a good start, encompassing about 60 countries, 70% of the world's population and 40% of current (and growing) GDP? Humm... even US lame stream media reports the same data. So, it's reality and not fantasy.
  • Is it fantasy to say China can recover Diaoyu isles, taken unjustly by Imperial Japan, without ever firing a shot? Let's see now... China knows time is on its side and war isn't necessary to recover lost territory, unjustly taken by force. So, it's reality and not fantasy.
  • Is it fantasy to think America will send our sons and daughters to die for your ex-divine emperor, just so Japan could hang onto it's ill gotten goods for a few more years? I got to admit, you're right on this item, and it is indeed fantasy to think that.
Click to expand...

And all irrelevant to the topic at hand and/or completely your personal tinted speculations.
As always no constructive topic to the thread.
 
Blackstone

Blackstone

Brigadier
SamuraiBlue said:
And all irrelevant to the topic at hand and/or completely your personal tinted speculations.
As always no constructive topic to the thread.
Click to expand...
Lacking anything to counter my thesis of current Diaoyu situation and likely outcomes, but desperate to retort with something, anything that sounds like resistence, you waffle with weaksauce. I'm disappointed you're unable to offer reality-based antithesis to test my thesis. But, I hope you'll keep thinking, and return with rational retort next time. Don't give up. the ship, SamuraiBlue, but try and do better next time.
 
SamuraiBlue

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Blackstone said:
Lacking anything to counter my thesis of current Diaoyu situation and likely outcomes, but desperate to retort with something, anything that sounds like resistence, you waffle with weaksauce. I'm disappointed you're unable to offer reality-based antithesis to test my thesis. But, I hope you'll keep thinking, and return with rational retort next time. Don't give up. the ship, SamuraiBlue, but try and do better next time.
Click to expand...

You have no thesis to begin with. You have not made any connections to how the size of a nation is going to transfer sovereignty of territory of one nation to the other. Until you have the above posting remains irrelevant to the topic at hand.
In other words you have no sauce.
 
J

jobjed

Captain
SamuraiBlue said:
You have not made any connections to how the size of a nation is going to transfer sovereignty of territory of one nation to the other.
Click to expand...

Don't you be worried about how sovereignty is transferred, it didn't bother you in 1895, it shan't bother us when the time comes.
 
A

antiterror13

Brigadier
SamuraiBlue said:
You have no thesis to begin with. You have not made any connections to how the size of a nation is going to transfer sovereignty of territory of one nation to the other. Until you have the above posting remains irrelevant to the topic at hand.
In other words you have no sauce.
Click to expand...

wowww, he (or she) gets very angry now :( showing the true BAD colours
 
Last edited:
A

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
SamuraiBlue said:
You have no thesis to begin with. You have not made any connections to how the size of a nation is going to transfer sovereignty of territory of one nation to the other. Until you have the above posting remains irrelevant to the topic at hand.
In other words you have no sauce.
Click to expand...

The size (and power) of a nation is very relevant when discussing what it can get from other nations, and the means by which it does so.

Look at the USA with regard to Canada, Mexico, Spain, etc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top