China's SCS Strategy Thread

solarz

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



This would be an interesting counter to Tillerson, who is obviously motivated by the Exxon Mobile deal with Vietnam.

The US may be the most powerful country in the world, but it can only project that power through regional proxies. China seems to have identified that as a key weakness, and is using non-military means of neutralizing those proxies.
 

vesicles

Colonel
What chance does Trump has of winning you ask? I'd say pretty good, because he has the people on his side. As Abe Lincoln once said during the Civil War, “I do the very best I can, I mean to keep going. If the end brings me out all right, then what is said against me won't matter. If I'm wrong, ten angels swearing I was right won't make a difference.”

Well, I'd say he is losing the battle. His press secretary has softened his tone toward the White House press corp. And I expect him to do the same in the near future.

I would say that this is a reflection of his personality. He said intelligence communities were incompetent and corrupted to the core. then in his speech to the CIA, he praised them for an excellent job that they have done.

He attacked the electoral college system as being rigged when he thought he would lose the electoral vote. Then he praised the electoral college as the best system ever and criticized popular vote as being rigged when he won the electoral college votes.

This is not about Trump intending to change the system. This is about how he treats criticism and those who disagree with him. Whoever disagrees with him will be branded as fake, incompetent and corrupted and will be treated as enemies (his own words).


Trump hasn't actually done anything to kill Freedom of the Press, as they remain free to print whatever they wish. He is, however, trying to break the Press' monopoly as purveyor of information to the unwashed masses, and in that task he has allies in the American public. I worry about Trump's protectionism and his willingness to take high risks on foreign policy, but I don't worry about him violating Press freedom en masse.

the fact that he threatened "serious consequences" to those in the media who continue to print bad things about him is actually a violation of freedom of press. A threat from the commander-in-chief of the most powerful nation in the world should be treated seriously, Yes? then his threat alone is a violation of freedom of speech.

In his speech to the CIA, he specifically prohibited media from showing pictures of "empty grass" from his inauguration. That is a very specific thing that he ordered. Note that he didn't order the media not to show "fake news", but ordered them not to show a very particular thing, regardless of whether that thing was true or not. that alone constitutes violation of free press.

I am a Republican myself and voted for Republicans almost every time I've voted. In the last election couple months ago, I voted straight Republican ticket, except for the President. Like AF Brat, I voted for Cruz during the Primary but he lost... Don't feel the need to defend Trump just because you are a Republican and he happens to be a Republican President. You and I have every right to question our leaders.
 

B.I.B.

Captain
Im too lazy to do any research at the moment. Last night on talk back radio I heard it said that "China gave up the right to claim territory when she signed on to UNCLOS and any other related bodies "which I have forgotten cause I was half asleep.
Is the statement correct?
 

solarz

Brigadier
Im too lazy to do any research at the moment. Last night on talk back radio I heard it said that "China gave up the right to claim territory when she signed on to UNCLOS and any other related bodies "which I have forgotten cause I was half asleep.
Is the statement correct?

No, it absolutely is not correct.

The UNCLOS offers signatory countries the option of opting out of certain clauses. China signed up to the UNCLOS with the specific declaration that it was opting out of any clauses that would affect its sovereignty claims.

The wester media routinely disseminates falsehoods ("alternative facts"?) on issues related to China. The above quote is one such example, especially blatant because it is a bald-faced lie.
 

kf6bka

New Member
Registered Member
No, it absolutely is not correct.

The UNCLOS offers signatory countries the option of opting out of certain clauses. China signed up to the UNCLOS with the specific declaration that it was opting out of any clauses that would affect its sovereignty claims.

The wester media routinely disseminates falsehoods ("alternative facts"?) on issues related to China. The above quote is one such example, especially blatant because it is a bald-faced lie.

here is the link to China's declaration...
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
... It will not bring the China Threat theory, but will only add authority to the People's Liberation Army.
found in the related Russian blog
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
:
3875424_800.jpg

let me see, I'm within range of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and up
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
Well, I'd say he is losing the battle. His press secretary has softened his tone toward the White House press corp. And I expect him to do the same in the near future.

I would say that this is a reflection of his personality. He said intelligence communities were incompetent and corrupted to the core. then in his speech to the CIA, he praised them for an excellent job that they have done.

He attacked the electoral college system as being rigged when he thought he would lose the electoral vote. Then he praised the electoral college as the best system ever and criticized popular vote as being rigged when he won the electoral college votes.

This is not about Trump intending to change the system. This is about how he treats criticism and those who disagree with him. Whoever disagrees with him will be branded as fake, incompetent and corrupted and will be treated as enemies (his own words).




the fact that he threatened "serious consequences" to those in the media who continue to print bad things about him is actually a violation of freedom of press. A threat from the commander-in-chief of the most powerful nation in the world should be treated seriously, Yes? then his threat alone is a violation of freedom of speech.

In his speech to the CIA, he specifically prohibited media from showing pictures of "empty grass" from his inauguration. That is a very specific thing that he ordered. Note that he didn't order the media not to show "fake news", but ordered them not to show a very particular thing, regardless of whether that thing was true or not. that alone constitutes violation of free press.

I am a Republican myself and voted for Republicans almost every time I've voted. In the last election couple months ago, I voted straight Republican ticket, except for the President. Like AF Brat, I voted for Cruz during the Primary but he lost... Don't feel the need to defend Trump just because you are a Republican and he happens to be a Republican President. You and I have every right to question our leaders.

Touche... I consider myself a conservative Christian and right leaning HOWEVER I am not a fan of Trump. While my values align more with the Republican party I am also not blinded by partisanship.

I also read both left right leaning news because I believe there are always some truth and error on BOTH sides. I do not have a lot of respect for folks who ONLY listen and watch newsmedia that aligns totally with their own belief system which most likely is not 100% correct anyway.

I do not belief Trump exhibits the values me and many like me believe in nor do I think he has the mental fortitude and deep wisdom to intelligently charter the course for this country especially in foreign policies and in dealing with China etc. Some of his cabinet appointments are also questionable in my opinion to lead this country to greatness.
 
Top