Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Corvette project 20386 hummm

Very well armed AAW, anti-ships, ASW versatile Russians do capable new Corvettes with robust armament but it is for a Brown Water and they need more big...

The 2nd very instesting for i do new counters with profile for my wargames :)

View attachment 33493
View attachment 33494

small Déjà vu
Monday at 4:42 PM
this is interesting:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

says the first of Project 20386 ("improved 20385"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) to be laid down this Friday (October 28); the description is vague, the graphics of "one of the designs" inside:
img16057.jpg

and, looking at the pictures, a bigger Déjà vu
Tuesday at 6:27 PM
Yesterday at 4:42 PM
Spanish blogger
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

...

:)
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
How many NATO subs and satellites are following the Russian CVN battle group?;)

Prolly just the Jimmy Carter, one undersea-boten is enough to do the do on the whole deal, HEH!, HEH!

I had a friend who had a veeerrry high security clearance, as well as Octopus scars on his chest. He had done a little welding on the Carter in port??? I didn't pump him for the details, he woulda told me, but I would prolly blab?? so I didn't ask.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
How many NATO subs and satellites are following the Russian CVN battle group?;)

I doubt the satilites are following it they kinda move to fast. but they are watching it no doubt. The Kuz though is just there as pageantry to Show the flag.
Interesting... the number Sat. capable do maritime reconnaissance is much less important than during Cold War, have decreased as all... Russians have very few, some and China possible now severals ?
EDIT : i have do a little research 3/4 years ago not completely exact... i have 11 US Satelittes capable for it KH-11, Lacrosse etc... and 6 Russians, Yantar.

In more with different orbites even if you have 10 sat only a part can detected so few are really on the good trajectory, i think and there you can see advantage of MPA.

In addition normaly you can' t detected a submarine with a satelitte and for ice : both Sat and a MPA can't detect under compact ice, not drifting, a reason why Soviet have do a Bastion in area btw Barents Sea up to Greenland close Spitzberg, for compensate than their subs are more detectable.

In other Sov. SSBN Bastion in Okhotsk Sea protected by Kuril Islands you don' t have compact ice just drifting ice.

The Seawolf are build especialy for going in this area and track Sov. SSBNs with a big weapons load, 50 weapons coz a long distance from ports and allow more attacks before reloading, more long time in mission.
Ofc Seawolf can do other mission but designed in first for these mission.

I think even a surface ships can' t detect a submarie under ice, i mean a surface ship without enter in the ice sea close the limit and the sub in.
 
Last edited:
Top