Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
I agree Jeff. I see only six aircraft on deck. Maybe there's another six to 10(?) in the hangar. The Russian logistic ablity to re-arm and resupply ADM"K" at sea is very, very limited. The Russian cannot UNREP side to side. They do it stern to bow.... and I've never seen any photos of a Russian VERTREP. We shall see how they handle this deployment.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Amen to every bit of that!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
I agree Jeff. I see only six aircraft on deck. Maybe there's another six to 10(?) in the hangar. The Russian logistic ablity to re-arm and resupply ADM"K" at sea is very, very limited. The Russian cannot UNREP side to side. They do it stern to bow.... and I've never seen any photos of a Russian VERTREP. We shall see how they handle this deployment.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Amen to every bit of that!
RU kuzn 24.10.2016.jpg

The fire department get ready also hehe :)
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Have you ever seen the Russians do a fire drill aboard a carrier? I think Jeff posted a video of that occasion once..very unprofessional. I cannot find that video.

I did find this very short video of the ADM"K" on fire..don't know where or when.


She sure is, I imagine there are many who like myself over-estimated Russian performance in areas such as this, I myself was extremely "enamored" by the Mig-29, and loved the Sukhoi SU-27, which is in fact a very fine aeroplane.

I later realized what a huge mistake I had made when I began to understand how much better prepared the average Western Aviator, Sailor, Soldier was prepared, trained, and motivated, and how much more reliable Western equipment in general, and Aircraft in particular were finished, outfitted, tested.

Now I do admire the auto-pilot, auto-land that the Russians say they have on more advanced fighters, particularly T-50, that would be very handy.
 
I agree Jeff. I see only six aircraft on deck. Maybe there's another six to 10(?) in the hangar. The Russian logistic ablity to re-arm and resupply ADM"K" at sea is very, very limited. The Russian cannot UNREP side to side. They do it stern to bow.... and I've never seen any photos of a Russian VERTREP. We shall see how they handle this deployment.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
shouldn't be a problem with the help from a NATO country:
Spain faces condemnation as it prepares to refuel Russian battle group heading to bomb Aleppo
Spain is facing international anger as it apparently prepares to refuel a flotilla of Russian warships due to step up strikes against the beleaguered city of Aleppo.

Politicians and military figures condemned the support from a Nato member, while the head of the alliance indicated Madrid should rethink the pit stop.

Warships from an eight-strong group led by the carrier Admiral Kuznetsov will take on fuel and supplies from the port of Ceuta, a Spanish enclave in north Africa, after passing through the Straits of Gibraltar on Wednesday morning,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Jens Stoltenberg, Nato's secretary general, said the carrier group, which passed through the English Channel last week, could be used to bomb civilians in the city.

He said: “It’s for each nation to decide whether these ships can get supplies and be fuelled in different harbours along the route towards the eastern Mediterranean.

“But at the same time we are concerned, and I have expressed that very clearly, about the potential use of this battle group to increase Russia’s ability and to be a platform for air strikes against Syria.

“This is something I have conveyed very clearly before and I repeat those concerns today. I believe that all Nato allies are aware this battle group can be used to conduct air strikes against Aleppo and Syria.”

Spain regularly refuels Russian warships at the North African port, which it says is not covered by Nato treaties. At least 60 Russian military craft have made technical stops at the Spanish enclave since April 2010, when the naval base was opened up to serve ships from other nations.

Sir Gerald Howarth MP, a former Defence Minister, said it would be “wholly inappropriate” for a Nato member to refuel the Russian vessels.

He said: “Spain is a member of Nato and Nato is already facing challenges from Russia, not least in the Baltics.

He went on: “The Russians stand accused of indiscriminate bombing in Aleppo and Syria and it would be inappropriate to render them military assistance.”

Lord West, a former head of the Royal Navy, added: “There are sanctions against Russia and it’s an extraordinary thing for a Nato ally to do.”

Guy Verhofstadt, the former Belgian prime minister, said on Twitter: “Spain signed EU statement on Russian war crimes in Aleppo last week; today helps refuel fleet on way to commit more atrocities. Seriously?”

Naval sources said the Kuznetsov itself would not dock in Ceuta, but its accompanying tanker and escorts could.

Spain’s Foreign Ministry told the Telegraph requests from the Russian navy were considered on a “case by case basis, depending on the characteristics of the ship concerned”.

A spokesman said: “Russian navy vessels have been making calls in Spanish ports for years”.

But in an indication Madrid was feeling increased diplomatic pressure not to help Moscow, the Spanish government said it was reviewing the Russian request.

The spokesman said: “The latest requested dockings are being revised at the current time in light of information we are receiving from our allies and from the Russian authorities.”

Russia’s military visits are estimated each to bring in more than £270,000 to the city through a combination of mooring fees, fuel and supplies, and the money spent by sailors during their time onshore.

Lt Gen Evgenny Buzhinsky, who oversaw relations with Nato as a former head of the Russian ministry of defence's international treaty department, described the stop in Spain as entirely routine.

"As long as the Spanish government hasn't banned it, it is a commercial matter like any other vessel stopping to take on supplies, even if it concerns military ships," he said. He said it is not unusual for Russian navy vessels take on supplies in Nato countries, including Greece and Italy.

Meanwhile the RAF on Tuesday night scrambled Typhoon jets to escort two Russian Bear bombers off the coast of Scotland.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Yesterday at 5:35 PM
the most recent I found:
CvpIcHbXYAE-S1C.jpg:large
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Russia unveils first image of prospective ICBM set to replace ‘Satan’ missile

Russia has unveiled the very first image of a new super-heavy thermonuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missile, the RS-28 Sarmat. The Sarmat, designed to be fitted with a hypersonic glider warhead, is expected to go into production as early as 2018.
The Sarmat is undergoing development at the Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau in the city of Miass. The first image of the new prospective missile was declassified by the bureau on Sunday.
A short
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
signed by chief designer V. Degtar and leading designer Y. Kaverin accompanies the illustration.
“In accordance with the Decree of the Russian Government 'On the State Defense Order for 2010 and the planning period 2012-2013,' the Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau was instructed to start design and development work on the Sarmat. In June 2011, the Bureau and the Russian Ministry of Defense signed a state contract for the Sarmat's development,” reads the note on the bureau's website.
The missile’s first stage engine PDU-99 was tested in August, while a hypersonic warhead for the upcoming ICBM was reportedly tested back in April.
The Sarmat is being developed to replace the RS-36M ICBM family – dubbed 'Satan' by NATO – which entered service in the 1970s and 1980s. The prospective missile, weighing at least 100 tons, features a large payload capacity – reportedly up to 10 tons – and is expected to have up to 10 heavy or 16 lighter warheads, or a combination of a number of warheads with decoys and other counter-measures to suppress enemy missile defenses. The Sarmat is expected to enter service in late 2018 and completely replace the RS-36M family by 2020.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


RS-28 Sarmat..jpg






 
Top