Type 95 movie

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
No I was mentioning that after feeling thw power of howitzer or even a real Gun, all manheld weapons and their recoil becomes into new perspective....
 

Nethappy

NO WAR PLS
VIP Professional
No I was mentioning that after feeling thw power of howitzer or even a real Gun, all manheld weapons and their recoil becomes into new perspective....

I know what you mean but was just joking. Anyway, it not possible to compare a howitzer of anykind with a handheld weapons and it shouldn't.
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
well It is possiple...., but guess my stance would 'open' to you afterwards you have fired whit gun so i wont continue this no more;)
 

WEN?

New Member
SteelBird said:
Does type 95 use 5.8mm round?

yeh the type 95 does use 5.8mm bullets. just asking but do you guys who have used a bullpop style weapon find the design of the gun kinda annoying. i mean when i was using a AUG for drill it was kinda bits and pieces here and there making it kinda annoying and the handle at the front, wouldn't that be harder to fire while holding that or don't you hold it at all. and does the clip being placed at the back of the gun make reloading harder?
 

Mr_C

Junior Member
VIP Professional
WEN? said:
yeh the type 95 does use 5.8mm bullets. just asking but do you guys who have used a bullpop style weapon find the design of the gun kinda annoying. i mean when i was using a AUG for drill it was kinda bits and pieces here and there making it kinda annoying and the handle at the front, wouldn't that be harder to fire while holding that or don't you hold it at all. and does the clip being placed at the back of the gun make reloading harder?

Hello, i have not posted stuff here for quite a while now.
Anyway as a person who used a styer AUG every single day, i must say i kinda like that weapon.
The handle at the front is kinda handy because it gives u a slightly better grip and adds to the stablilty of the rifle during discharge especially when firing from a standing position. But then that is just me. The handle can be closed so u can hold it like a "tradition" rifle if u want. Oh yes the handle makes removing the barrel very handy. But seriously its all a matter of getting used to it.
As for the clip being at the back, well i had no problems reloading it, like i said its all practice, and eventually it just becomes natural.
The only thing i do not like abt the Styer is the cocking handle because it sticks out at an angle which may get damaged when u do stuff. In occasions the entire cocking handle falls off and u r left with a small bit of metal to cock ur weapon, that is when u know ur stuffed.
Looking at the vid the T-95 looks nice, but i wonder if it would be hard to cock the weapon because it seems the space to put ur hand there is so small.
 

RedMercury

Junior Member
Smaller people have smaller hands :)

I think the past complaints about the type-95 have generally focused on 1) smoke and noise from firing 2) spent cases ejecting too close to the face. Of course the people who were used to type-81s were complaining about the bullpup balance compared to the traditional rifle's balance. Also, people online speculated about the position of the safety (at the magazine) being rather inconvenient. I think this is a rather large design flaw too, but apparently I don't recall reading complaints about this from people who've fired it. As to complaint 1, I read an article that said the smoke was really a problem with the factory oil cooking-off and not a problem after it's all gone.

Note that the "Type-95" isn't just a monolithic piece of equipment, it has gone through subtle design changes. I'm not an expert on this and I only noticed when people in the know pointed out things such as different cooling vents. So it is an evolving weapon, even though the name isn't changing.
 

Nethappy

NO WAR PLS
VIP Professional
Mr C. u seem quite experience with the AUG. Anyway, it the same bloody rifle we use in the Aussie army and the goverment F** up the rifle cos some material and it has some overheading problem.
like i said its all practice, and eventually it just becomes natural.
Anyway back to the reloading problem, if anyone of you who been reading my post. I been trying to tell everyone this and thank you for elaborating my point.
With my personal experience the AUG was actually easy to shoot and handle at longer range then the M-16. Once your use to the front handle, you would find the AUG much easy to easier to handle and you dun need to twist your front hand like you do while holding a tradition rifle. Which IMO much more comfortable.

but i wonder if it would be hard to cock the weapon because it seems the space to put ur hand there is so small.
For a Chinese NO. You must remember this rifle is design for a chinese and most chinse has smaller hands.

think the past complaints about the type-95 have generally focused on 1) smoke and noise from firing 2) spent cases ejecting too close to the face. Of course the people who were used to type-81s were complaining about the bullpup balance compared to the traditional rifle's balance. Also, people online speculated about the position of the safety (at the magazine) being rather inconvenient. I think this is a rather large design flaw too, but apparently I don't recall reading complaints about this from people who've fired it. As to complaint 1, I read an article that said the smoke was really a problem with the factory oil cooking-off and not a problem after it's all gone.

Note that the "Type-95" isn't just a monolithic piece of equipment, it has gone through subtle design changes. I'm not an expert on this and I only noticed when people in the know pointed out things such as different cooling vents. So it is an evolving weapon, even though the name isn't changing.

Anyway after close study of the movie, there didn't seem to be any smoke problem, and it also reallly hard to assumed that the position of safety at the magazine is a major problem cos as long as it within a thumb length there really should be much of a problem. It seem quite to have quite good handle too. But i wouldn't know till I fire one.
 

RedMercury

Junior Member
Don't have that number, but for comparison, type-56 is around 600 rmb and type-81 is around 800 rmb. Type 88 sniper rifle is around 2.5k iirc. These are, iirc, procurement costs for PAP or police.
 

China Marines

New Member
Désolé je parle à peine anglais.

Thank you for your answer Red Mercury! But I did not include/understand very well...

The Type-56 cost 600 yuans? Semi have correspond has... 6 euros?! What means "iirc"? :confused:
 
Top