Chinese Engine Development

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Could this be FWS-10B ?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I thought they successfully test this engine last December So this article is kind of flash back

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

J-10C with homemade engine conducts trial flight
Posted on
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Recently Chinese military fans took pictures of a J-10C fighter in trial flight. J-10C is an improved version based on J-10 fighter jet (NATO codename: Firefly), and is said to be positioned as a fighter bomber.

It has been reported in May that J-10C had successfully tested China’s homemade FWS-10B engine, with stronger thrust than FWS-10 and additional FADEC system.

J-10C can take over four tons of ammunition, and is equipped with a targeting pod for launching precision-guided munitions. This kind of pod is reported to be similar to Israeli Rafael Arms’ Litening pod, of which a newer version is also used by U.S. fighter jets.

Some analysts also said J-10C is an improved version of J-10B, of which the production has been stopped. Compared to J-10B fighter jet, J-10C has improved electronic system and uses homemade improved engine, while other parts are just the same as J-10B.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Production type J-10B fighter

This judgment is based on serial numbers of both types of fighter jets. J-10B type began its test flights in December 2008, and a J-10B fighter numbered “101” appeared in the second half of 2013. According to Chinese new-type aircrafts’ traditions, “1XX” number indicates that trial fight has ended, and formal production will begin.

A prototype numbered “201” similar to J-10B appeared earlier this year, but it is different from production J-10B in some aspects. It has antennas both beneath the nose of the aircraft and on the back. Judged from the convention, “2XX” should be a largely improved version of “1XX”, so experts concluded that that was the rumored J-10C.

prototype-pf-J-10C-300x164.jpg
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
a lot of stuff came out here.

Sounds like WS-10B has achieved design certification by sometimes 2014, so mass production of it must have started already. That probably explains why we saw the 2 J-10Bs flying with it at end of last year. WS-10B must have been already tested and in service with J-11Bs and J-16s before they were comfortable testing it with J-10B. So I would imagine at least a portion if not all of the J-11Bs and J-16s from since start of 2015 are using WS-10B. Also of note is that the original FWS-10 has achieved production certification, so the initial overhaul for FWS-10 is 1000 hours. Remember, the long endurance testing to achieve design certification was 300 hours, so this shows the progress. Now FWS-10 first achieved design certification in 2006, but it was not really installed on J-11B until 2008 when they found the problems. If we say that production certification was achieved by 2014, then it took in reality about 6 years to achieve production certification. Considering that it took 3 years for WS-9 to do this, it shows you how much work was required when you are developing a new engine vs cloning one.

Also sounds like WS-15 has entered into the phase of achieve design certification sometimes in 2015 after 7 years of tests on the testbed. It's probably another 5 years from design certification (2001 to 2006 for WS-10 I think)..
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
a lot of stuff came out here.

Sounds like WS-10B has achieved design certification by sometimes 2014, so mass production of it must have started already. That probably explains why we saw the 2 J-10Bs flying with it at end of last year. WS-10B must have been already tested and in service with J-11Bs and J-16s before they were comfortable testing it with J-10B. So I would imagine at least a portion if not all of the J-11Bs and J-16s from since start of 2015 are using WS-10B. Also of note is that the original FWS-10 has achieved production certification, so the initial overhaul for FWS-10 is 1000 hours. Remember, the long endurance testing to achieve design certification was 300 hours, so this shows the progress. Now FWS-10 first achieved design certification in 2006, but it was not really installed on J-11B until 2008 when they found the problems. If we say that production certification was achieved by 2014, then it took in reality about 6 years to achieve production certification. Considering that it took 3 years for WS-9 to do this, it shows you how much work was required when you are developing a new engine vs cloning one.

Hmm ... but isn't the WS-10B the version for the J-10 with the gear-boxes mounted to the bottom - similar to the AL-31FN was derived from the Flanker-used AL-31F - and as such it simply could not be installed in a Flanker ??


Also sounds like WS-15 has entered into the phase of achieve design certification sometimes in 2015 after 7 years of tests on the testbed. It's probably another 5 years from design certification (2001 to 2006 for WS-10 I think)...


Any idea when we can see one installed in a J-20 at best ?
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Were any specifications like thrust leaked?

I think it's been known for a while that this is the 14 ton thrust engine.

Hmm ... but isn't the WS-10B the version for the J-10 with the gear-boxes mounted to the bottom - similar to the AL-31FN was derived from the Flanker-used AL-31F - and as such it simply could not be installed in a Flanker ??

Any idea when we can see one installed in a J-20 at best ?

you can never be too sure on this, but the Chinese sources indicate that it was flown on flankers first before J-10. So I can only assume that there are 2 versions with different gearbox location.
 
Top