Terrorism against Chinese targets

Plenty of people around the globe wonders ... ...
Plenty of times --- How come US Radio Free Asia and some Uyghur websites
in the western world had the abilities to announce ... ...
many Uyghur terrorists attacks just 5 minutes after it happened ??

Ohh, they must have superior clairvoyant abilities.

Well I think you can find similar stories of people who the West calls terrorists. That's the problem where people think in literally black and white. There's good or evil... nothing else. They can give just cause for Uighurs and their disputes but its sacrilegious to dare to want to learn the roots when they're the victims. To suggest that makes it they're the evildoer that gave reason for people to attack them. They're not good but in fact evil like Chinese because you can find a reason why Uighurs attack.

The problem with Beijing is they should stop seeking the West's recognition. That's superficial. Like if they got it, would the problem resolve itself? They're still going to have to handle terrorism and even with recognition the West isn't going to help. Just go by the worst what the critics think how China is dealing with terrorism. The West is just giving lip-service to the Uighurs in reaction.

GreenestGDP said:

Plenty of people around the globe wonders ... ...
Plenty of times --- How come US Radio Free Asia and some Uyghur websites
in the western world had the abilities to announce ... ...
many Uyghur terrorists attacks just 5 minutes after it happened ??

Ohh, they must have superior clairvoyant abilities.

Click to expand...

Do u guys remember a plane hijack stopped by brave passengers and attendents several years ago? The spokesman of World Uyghur Congress, Dilixat, claims that it was caused by Hans fighting Uyghurs for seats.
Lets just put aside how ridiculous that a fight for seat could happen under a "1 ticket-1 seat number" system, all the people despite the hijackers were not Uyghur, so, how could the WUC know what happened on the plane?
Only thing I can see from their speed of response is that WUC were pre-informed, if not managed, the hijack.
Germany just let a terrorism group exist legally on its territory. For what? For the votes from those poor brainwashed guys.

So-called "free media" kept spreading lies. The BBC use labels like "China use Paris terrorism attack to incite public opinion" for a journal about a 56-day-long hunt on terrorists. FKU western mainstream medias! I do not need the government to incite me since a guy I knew was KIA in that ATO!
Imagine one person was teaching you UrbanCQB123 several weeks ago, then all in a sudden u heared him got killed, when you and your friends are in sorrow, someone with freedom of speech says the cause he died for is a political show and those killed him are good guys.
Really difficult to hold dirty words in mouth, huh?

The terrorists attacked China, even those who threw bombs to Uyghur crowds in a bazaar, is under quotation marks EVERY SINGLE TIME. Those attacked west are undoubtful terrorists, and all those attack Chinese civilians must be freedomfighters, we know it very well.
CNN use photos of Nepal police repressing riot and claim it is Chinese government suppressing Tibetans. Foreign country repression is teleported into China.
AFP claim a crowd of Chinese people weaving slogans are "protesters expressing their opinion to the authority", regardless the characters written on all slogans are "招工", which means "hiring workers". HR meeting become a demonstration.
Reuters add the comments from WUC in every article about Xinjiang, but never mentioned that WUC is significantly funding and masterminding ETIM, a terrorism organization listed by American. Why don't they invite Al-Queda or IS to say something after a suicide bombing?
BBC report the successful Chinese ATO right after Paris attack. Even if the government published the sound record of the assult, BBC still could say "erased the voice of women and children". One of the most improtant priciple of mordern law-rule is "Who suggest an opinion, who show the evidence", where is your "original, unedited" record, my dear respected BBC? Lecturing that Chinese Armed Forces is capable to nothing but only slautering civilians, is that making you Johns feel any better?
NYT reported some new discipline of the party, and traslated Article 46 "妄议中央大政方针" into "discussing party policy in open manner", "妄" means "absurd, presuptuous, fantastic, irresposibly" in Chinese. Yeah, "distort Party Central Committee's policies " become "discuss party policy in open manner". Substituting the request on excuting resolution into request on the progress forming reslution, what a fantastic performance of editorial independence! Salute to the journalist Edward Wong!

Those bias, discrimination, double standard, despicable "mistakes", faked details......no matter they are systematic slander or "coincidence", they do not only obstructed western masses to learn the real world. Chinese people are willing to know how the world is and how there ware in other's eyes.《参考消息(Information for Reference)》 has been the bestselling newspaper for more than a decade. It is an official paper translate those relatively fair journal from serious foreign media. Moreover, there are grass-roots websites translating online news about China worldwide everyday, more than 10 as far as I know. These websites translate both news and the comments beneath them. So, they unveiled the reality hidden by officials that how the hostility burns wildly on Quora, Yahoo, Reddit, Dailymail.uk, NYTimes, Washingtonpost, Economist, Naver, Indiatimes, etc.
So you can see, the irresponsible behavior of so-called mainstream media not only fooled their people, but planted the seed of disappointed and hatred in the hearts of those Chinese people who are most willingly communicate to outside world, best educated, most open-minded, in a word, the hardcore of next generation.

There will be consequences, this is not threat, just statement. Since the behavior damaging interests, mental, even flesh of Chinese people is inevitable in such an atomsphere where defiling China is politically correct, it is ridiculous to assume that the victims will just let it go. Being aggressive without the awareness of payback is obviously unwise, but, to those private owned, profit-oriented, "free" medias, it is really awkward to let them bother considering social and public responsibility.

GreenestGDP said:

Plenty of people around the globe wonders ... ...
Plenty of times --- How come US Radio Free Asia and some Uyghur websites
in the western world had the abilities to announce ... ...
many Uyghur terrorists attacks just 5 minutes after it happened ??

Ohh, they must have superior clairvoyant abilities.

Click to expand...

I see your sarcasm.

Phoenix_Rising said:

Do u guys remember a plane hijack stopped by brave passengers and attendents several years ago? The spokesman of World Uyghur Congress, Dilixat, claims that it was caused by Hans fighting Uyghurs for seats.
Lets just put aside how ridiculous that a fight for seat could happen under a "1 ticket-1 seat number" system, all the people despite the hijackers were not Uyghur, so, how could the WUC know what happened on the plane?
Only thing I can see from their speed of response is that WUC were pre-informed, if not managed, the hijack.
Germany just let a terrorism group exist legally on its territory. For what? For the votes from those poor brainwashed guys.

So-called "free media" kept spreading lies. The BBC use labels like "China use Paris terrorism attack to incite public opinion" for a journal about a 56-day-long hunt on terrorists. FKU western mainstream medias! I do not need the government to incite me since a guy I knew was KIA in that ATO!
Imagine one person was teaching you UrbanCQB123 several weeks ago, then all in a sudden u heared him got killed, when you and your friends are in sorrow, someone with freedom of speech says the cause he died for is a political show and those killed him are good guys.
Really difficult to hold dirty words in mouth, huh?

The terrorists attacked China, even those who threw bombs to Uyghur crowds in a bazaar, is under quotation marks EVERY SINGLE TIME. Those attacked west are undoubtful terrorists, and all those attack Chinese civilians must be freedomfighters, we know it very well.
CNN use photos of Nepal police repressing riot and claim it is Chinese government suppressing Tibetans. Foreign country repression is teleported into China.
AFP claim a crowd of Chinese people weaving slogans are "protesters expressing their opinion to the authority", regardless the characters written on all slogans are "招工", which means "hiring workers". HR meeting become a demonstration.
Reuters add the comments from WUC in every article about Xinjiang, but never mentioned that WUC is significantly funding and masterminding ETIM, a terrorism organization listed by American. Why don't they invite Al-Queda or IS to say something after a suicide bombing?
BBC report the successful Chinese ATO right after Paris attack. Even if the government published the sound record of the assult, BBC still could say "erased the voice of women and children". One of the most improtant priciple of mordern law-rule is "Who suggest an opinion, who show the evidence", where is your "original, unedited" record, my dear respected BBC? Lecturing that Chinese Armed Forces is capable to nothing but only slautering civilians, is that making you Johns feel any better?
NYT reported some new discipline of the party, and traslated Article 46 "妄议中央大政方针" into "discussing party policy in open manner", "妄" means "absurd, presuptuous, fantastic, irresposibly" in Chinese. Yeah, "distort Party Central Committee's policies " become "discuss party policy in open manner". Substituting the request on excuting resolution into request on the progress forming reslution, what a fantastic performance of editorial independence! Salute to the journalist Edward Wong!

Those bias, discrimination, double standard, despicable "mistakes", faked details......no matter they are systematic slander or "coincidence", they do not only obstructed western masses to learn the real world. Chinese people are willing to know how the world is and how there ware in other's eyes.《参考消息(Information for Reference)》 has been the bestselling newspaper for more than a decade. It is an official paper translate those relatively fair journal from serious foreign media. Moreover, there are grass-roots websites translating online news about China worldwide everyday, more than 10 as far as I know. These websites translate both news and the comments beneath them. So, they unveiled the reality hidden by officials that how the hostility burns wildly on Quora, Yahoo, Reddit, Dailymail.uk, NYTimes, Washingtonpost, Economist, Naver, Indiatimes, etc.
So you can see, the irresponsible behavior of so-called mainstream media not only fooled their people, but planted the seed of disappointed and hatred in the hearts of those Chinese people who are most willingly communicate to outside world, best educated, most open-minded, in a word, the hardcore of next generation.

There will be consequences, this is not threat, just statement. Since the behavior damaging interests, mental, even flesh of Chinese people is inevitable in such an atomsphere where defiling China is politically correct, it is ridiculous to assume that the victims will just let it go. Being aggressive without the awareness of payback is obviously unwise, but, to those private owned, profit-oriented, "free" medias, it is really awkward to let them bother considering social and public responsibility.

Click to expand...

Yeah but the more those media keeps telling slanders about China the more they lose credibility and the more no one would care about them.

"Foreign-led". Why make it hard. Just say who is responsible.
I bet hundred dollar the country where these terrorists originated from starts with the letter "T" and to make it real easy for people, its the country that just pick a fight with the bear.

I am even willing to bet for $1000 dollars! If this country gets flatten if Putin has his way, almost all of China's problem in the west region will disappear, and half of the ISIS will simply disappear too!

"ISIS推中文聖戰歌 招攬華人 專家：聖誕或襲中國東南亞"

ISIS introduced Chinese jihad songs to recruit Chinese, Experts: May attack China and Southeast Asia during Christmas season.

"極端組織「伊斯蘭國」（ISIS）首次推出中文聖戰歌曲，以男聲混音方式唱出「我們是聖戰士」，疑意圖在中國招兵買馬。中國外交部昨日表示沒聽過有關消息，重申中方願與外界合作打擊ISIS在內的恐怖主義活動。新加坡反恐專家警告，ISIS已下令支持者在亞洲施襲，有可能在聖誕節期間向包括中國的東北亞與東南亞國家施襲。中國山西省公安廳昨日證實，拘捕4名企圖在該省施襲的恐怖分子。"

Extremist organization " Islamic State " (ISIS), for the first time, introduced Chinese jihad songs in remixed male vocal singing "We are holy warriors ", intending to recruit in China. Chinese Foreign Ministry said yesterday that they haven't heard about related news and reaffirmed that China is willing to cooperate with the outside world in combating terrorism, including those of ISIS. Terrorism experts from Singapore warned that, ISIS ordered supporters to launch attacks in Asia, possibly during the Christmas season in Northeast and Southeast Asian countries including China. The Public Security Bureau of Shanxi Province in China, yesterday confirmed the arrests of four suspects attempting terrorist attacks in the province.

Embassies in Beijing are warning foreigners of possible attacks around Christmas

Extra security in Sanlitun. (Reuters/Jason Lee)

WRITTEN BY


December 24, 2015


The holidays are off to an unsettling start in Beijing.

This morning (Dec. 24) the US embassy urging foreigners to stay away from Sanlitun, a major shopping district, citing “possible threats against Westerners” as a reason for the warning. The area is popular among expatriates and is also home to several foreign embassy offices.

The embassies of France and the UK have since issued similar messages. The British embassy also traveling in Xinjiang, the Chinese province known for its Muslim population.

China’s embassy in the US also for its citizens living there to be cautious (link in Chinese), without offering specific information.

Observers report that traffic has been closed in the areas surrounding most of the embassies in Sanlitun. Meanwhile, pictures have circulated on WeChat showing armed military vehicles inside a pedestrian shopping area and near some embassy offices.




The US embassy in China couldn’t be reached for comment outside of normal operating hours.

Warnings directed at foreigners such as these are rare in China, as is violence directed at Westerners in general. In August, a young Chinese male stabbed a French national and his Chinese girlfriend, killing the latter. It’s not clear if , which also occurred in Sanlitun, was motivated by anti-foreign sentiment.

plawolf said:

In hindsight, it should be pretty obvious that their main aim and goal wasn't to try and disrupt the flow of oil and gas, but rather to create martyrs and turn the local population against Beijing and the Han.

A few people with suitcases full of cash, small amounts of explosives and weapons effectively manufactured the racial tensions and violence in Xinjiang, and they have never let up.

Click to expand...

Yup, back then it was the Soviet Union using Uighurs in an attempt to destabilize China. These days, we know who are behind the cash flow.

However, I would also point out that Xinjiang has never been a tranquil region since it was most recently incorporated into Chinese territory in the Qing Dynasty. The Qing fought quite a few battles with Uighur tribes, and this kind of history has a lasting and reverberating impact.

There is no simple solution to Xinjiang's problems, only hard work and dedication. Keep raising the people living standards while harshly rooting out and destroying any violent attempt at insurgency.