Japan Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

antiterror13

Brigadier
Actually, antiterror asks a valid question -- the JSDF do not have an indigenous AEW&C radar in service. Their E-767s and E-2s are of course US designs.

Obviously there are a number of Japanese domestic radars aboard other platforms, and he might have been talking about radars aboard other platforms, but it is also worth noting that they have not developed a radar for AEW&C before... though I'm sure it is within their capability

Thanks Blitzo, that's exactly what I meant. I have to admit that I didn't put the question perfectly and it could be seen "sissing" by a few .. I thought obviously we are talking about AEW&C radar, so when I said radar I meant AEW&C radar ..... ohh well, too bad
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Yes but Japan does not want to repeat the F-2 fiasco in which Japan was planning to develop the F-2 independently acquiring US made jet engine but the US refused Japan's request in which they made a stern proposal in a joint development in return for providing the engines.
This had been a bad experience that turned worse when the US took all data on research of carbon composite and newly developed onboard AESA radar system for free in the name of Joint development.
It's a never again situation which Japan made sure it would not happen again.

Is there any source to back it up ? or purely your opinions?
It's hard to believe that the US would need doing that (AESA and carbon composite)
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
I'm surprised that some people here would think he's trolling, and at the sensitivity of it.
Antiterror has been warned before for leading questions like this and then replying with flame bait when they were honestly answered.

On this very same thread:

AT13 Warned on Japan Threadhttps://www.sinodefenceforum.com/japan-military-news-reports-data-etc.t2436/page-132#post-351562https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/japan-military-news-reports-data-etc.t2436/page-132#post-351562

That's why.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
nope, Jeff didn't warn me at all. You got it wrong!
Actually, antiterror13, I did.

See my above post to Bltizo and the link to the post on this thread where I did so.

I did so on this thread informally...and did not list it in the Announcements. After all of this, and your denials...now I will formally list it.

I mentioned in that post that if you did so again, you would be suspended. I am of a mind to suspend you two weeks for your denial...but since I did not make it official, I will forbear.

Now that it is official...I will do so if such behavior continues.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Actually, antiterror13, I did.

See my above post to Bltizo and the link to the post on this thread where I did so.

I did so on this thread informally...and did not list it in the Announcements. After all of this, and your denials...now I will formally list it.

I mentioned in that post that if you did so again, you would be suspended. I am of a mind to suspend you two weeks for your denial...but since I did not make it official, I will forbear.

Now that it is official...I will do so if such behavior continues.

>>>> Later <<<<

Looking back, on the principle post of yours that I deleted back then, I did give you and official warning. And it was for exactly the same types of leading questions about radars, and other parts of equipment the Japanese manufacture.

I just did not announce it publically...but I KNOW you received notification of it because that is how the new SD system works for official warnings.

So, you denied you got a warning when you actually did. I have extended the warning points for another rmonths. I am now giving you more warning points for your denial. Any more of this behavior will result in a hefty suspension from SD.

DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS MODERATION
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Antiterror has been warned before for leading questions like this and then replying with flame bait when they were honestly answered.

On this very same thread:

AT13 Warned on Japan Thread

That's why.

I'm not sure if any posts were deleted in that particular chain of posts, so maybe that would give more context for what had actually transpired there... but based off what I can see he was asking similar questions regarding the origin of various subsystems and wondering why Japan couldn't produce it themselves? Given the advanced state of Japanese industry, it is a valid question.

Was post 1314 the reason for the warning? I can understand that it's a loaded post, but his statement also not exactly untrue and in time Japanese foreign policy may definitely become more independent.
(Note: there are obviously certain political topics on SDF which we do not broach mostly regarding Chinese politics, but I did not know that discussing the future possibilities of Japanese politics was also a red line. If it is, maybe add it into the official rules so everyone knows?)

Regardless, I'm not trying to challenge the judgement of the matter as the mod, and I didn't follow the posts as they emerged, I'm just expressing a slight bit of confusion regarding the reaction to his most recent question about radars and his previous posts that I can see (from page 131 and 132).

On the topic at hand, with antiterror's clarification above, we can see that he meant it only in relation to AEW&C radars... although it would have been a valid question for all Japanese ships and aircraft as well just on the basis of lack of familiarity.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
I'm not sure if any posts were deleted in that particular chain of posts, so maybe that would give more context for what had actually transpired there... .
Bltizo, several posts were deleted and it was well founded..

Please do not respond here on the open forum to moderation.

If you have an issue...PM myself or other moderators about it.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Bltizo, several posts were deleted and it was well founded..

Please do not respond here on the open forum to moderation.

If you have an issue...PM myself or other moderators about it.

It's alright, if posts were deleted then clearly I'm missing some of the picture so I'll assume that the warning was delivered for good reason. I was merely expressing confusion based on the posts I could see (AKA the posts which were not deleted).
 
Top