PLA inventory Tally

Troika

Junior Member
Gollevainen said:
well possible and optium are luxury of some other things, not when listing PLA's inventory. Only facts are to be included so there isent any other proper answer that 50+ J-10.

But offcourse that doesent look good trough red and gold eye-glasess so we propaply hear some more...

Quite. ACtually I am quite interested to hear some more on these counting systems and so on. I try to follow Russian sales to China, and engines is one of the more difficult items to track hold of. The rumoured 100 Al-31F deal was of course in 2005. Making it difficult to manufacture since then a large batch, since I am not even sure delivery status has finished. The best I can find indicates that by the end of April sixty units was delivered... obviously not close to enough time to assemble many planes.
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
China ordered a second batch of engines, i forget hom many. China can make 24-36 j-10s a year, so the first 54 were delivered soemtime in 2004. Thne production went on through the rest of 2004, 2005, and some of 2006 to make 100.

According to what???? Thats what Im saying, You cannot assume anything by the possiple production rates and that when some guy in internet know that his mother's niece's boyfriend had heard from the company's horsemens that china is bying 1,000 Al-21 from russia and they are almoust like AL-31F so IT MUST MEAN THAT THERE IS AT LEAST 1,000 J-10 in service!!!!!:mad:

If china has only 54 jet engines it doesent mean that they automaticly install them all to service fighters. There needs to be maintance reserve and spare engines to keep the service aircraft in operational level. Im not sure what the ration should be, but defianelty not 1:1
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
Dude, please chill. Why get angry over such a matter? Why yell? Getting more on topic - no one knows for sure, we all know that. It's just how everything in the military world goes - especially so with china. So we're left with guessing based on what has been reported on the newsites. Which is that, after the initial prototype phase, for which we do not know how many engines there were and how many preproduction planes were made, 54 engines were purchased in 2002 and all delivered by 2004. Then in august 2005 it was announced another deal for 100 engines was made. Some claim delivery started by the end of the year, of course no one can confirm or deny that. I would assume the rate of delivery must be faster than with the first batch of engines, simply cause its expensive to maintain a production line for CAC with just a trickle of airplanes being made.

In the end? Who knows? Maybe china has just 10 j-10s, and they repaint the numbers on the all the time and just send them around. Maybe ws-10 has been adopted for use on j-10 and is already being installed in new planes and theres 150 of them already. Maybe we are both just dreaming things while actually being part of the evil matrix world. I certainly won't lose any sleep over the number of planes china might or might not have. While my initial projection, at the time i made it, should've perhaps read 50-90 planes i am guessing (like anyone else here) that today's number could very well be in the 70-100 range, depending on the number of engines delivered and the number of engines existing before the 2002 engine order.

As for number of extra engines, greece for example considered an order for 40 f-16 at one time (30 they bought in the end, 10 left as an option) and that deal had lots of details announced, among them 6 extra engines. that's 46 engines total for 40 planes. If we assume russian engines need 50% more extra spares that's 44 planes in the initial production phase that lasted for 2.5-3 years now. It is again then assumed that production had to ramp up and that chinese had assurances that next batch of engines would come faster (with enough money anything is possible). further 100 engines would be enough for additional 82 planes.

So, lowest possible number is probably around 40-45 production planes. I guess some of us here don't think that's likeley, hence the 70-100 figure. I guess its my fault not to add the lowest figure into account but just give the probable and max number. So once to end it for all - 40 planes minimum number, 100 planes maximum, likely number of planes - 70. Do i have hard proof for any of this? Absolutely not. :)

EDIT: I hate making this into one long post but since forum rules state no double posting... If true, the post on CDF about news item that salyut issued at berlin air show over the engines for china sheds some new light on the possible number of planes. It states that 60 engines have been delivered while remaining 40 being ready by june with china probably approving them by july. So we have some 8 months during which 60 engines have been delivered, obviously in few large batches, starting possibly as early as september, with engines russians had on stock. lets assume october for confirmation. It would allow for some 8-9 planes per month since then - obviously way more than china can produce, but it was stated some were versions fit for j-11 anyway. So i'll revise my estimate once again. If the pre 2002 batch of engines for preproduction planes was minimal, just for prototypes and such then CAC could have made 45 production planes by october, and since then a larger scale production beginning from november with some 70 production planes done by end of april 2006. Of course, that doesnt equal to 70 planes in plaaf service.
 
Last edited:

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Well im angry, simply becouse in the past two years i have spended whit internet Chinese military "circles", I have came too much cross this sort of thinking. Back in then i came cross whit all sort of "news" or "reports" that made thing wheter my good old realible sources were complete nonsense. it took while before i become to understant that majority of people that post in this and past sinodefence forum thinks things bit differently. To them if things can be that way, it could therefore be this way and that leads it being something else. And thats only the basis of where people beguns to speculate things even futher away. Its all about seeing the positive prospects and obtions only totally ignoring the negative side and possiple faults in the bigger scale. partially that why i orginally accepted to be come a mod, to clear SDF out of this sort of arguments and make us to be the first really objective chinese military forum.

Im not saying that this is some sort of chinese national character. its more of age and nationalism related proplem. Many chinese thinks otherwise and many westeners things exactly the same way.

So you can imagine how it pisses me off. I have learned to avoid certain issues simply becouse i dont want to battle the source of the 'opponents' claims but of the matter itself. Only this J-10 service status issue have imposed so planely some of the biggest faults of this certain way of thinking that I just couldnt help myself.

You (Totoro) where the first to say (in this thread) what i want everyone to do when making any claims. Altouhg my number is still lover than yours, you made good point on wheter to base it and said that it's only assumptions. Previously people just stated the numbers as a fact (which led me to freak out).
 

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
Gollevainen said:
According to what???? Thats what Im saying, You cannot assume anything by the possiple production rates and that when some guy in internet know that his mother's niece's boyfriend had heard from the company's horsemens that china is bying 1,000 Al-21 from russia and they are almoust like AL-31F so IT MUST MEAN THAT THERE IS AT LEAST 1,000 J-10 in service!!!!!:mad:

If china has only 54 jet engines it doesent mean that they automaticly install them all to service fighters. There needs to be maintance reserve and spare engines to keep the service aircraft in operational level. Im not sure what the ration should be, but defianelty not 1:1

China has extensive contracts for spares parts and maintenance for of the al-31, so spares arnt essential.

There have reportings of china ordering more engines, supposiedly for su-27s and j-11s. BUT WE HAVNT SEEN MANY NEW SU-27s or J-11s. What does that imply?

And chill, and stop blaming it on nationalism. We have a right to be proud, and saying china has 100 j-10s is not such a redioulous claim. you yourself are making assumptions that our surrent methods of prediction are inaccurate.
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
There have reportings of china ordering more engines, supposiedly for su-27s and j-11s. BUT WE HAVNT SEEN MANY NEW SU-27s or J-11s. What does that imply?

Imply...let's see it could imply that the gods of high-pass turbofan engines have been angry and are not allowing chinese to install them to any planes unless proper sacrifices are beeing made. We cannot base any fact on implying or assumptions....things based on those are called assumptions or speculations.

But Im not making assumptions of your methods are innacurate, im simply saying the fact that they mostly are. Everytime something needs words like "it could be" or "it migth be" you are on wrong tracs if you tsill come to the conclusion that is the possiple maxium. In all cases like J-10 inventory, one must see the other possipilityes as well and not simply declear that there are 100+ in service, but that 100 is the maxium ammount that can be, and around 50 is the minium. Objectivines, objectivines...like i said in my post to Totoro, who by the way made a text book example of how to base one clames. Tell all the source and clearly remark the points that are assumptions or otherwise speculative matters

Oh, And I blame nationalism becouse otherwise I would have to blame you kids personally and that wouldnt be nice;) ...and anyway as you say it yourself, you are beeing proud of J-10, aka connecting j-10 to your nationalist feelings. Anyone taking part of international defence discussion knows that its a recepy for disaster.
 

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
alright then, ask typhuang, our educated, non-nationalistic moderator why he thinks china has 100 j-10s. He will be able to explain it to you better than I can.

The original 54 were made to exactly one standard, yet we see some j-10s with different landing wheel doors than others. Clearly, a second batch must have been built.
 

Troika

Junior Member
I really should have done this right at the beginning. But I didn't. I even got carried away myself. But here we are.

A Tally means a count. As in confirmed sightings, official figures, serial counts. Failing all that, and only if you have good reason to do so, estimates based on regimental counts, and each figure must be clearly labelled and given origin. Also may be included is confirmed sightings of ships in construction (clearly marked as such) and foreign deals finalised pending delivery (also clearly marked as such).

NO speculation. That's for some other thread.

And Gollevainen, while I understand your irritation, please do not fire blindly at everybody at this thread... I for instance have no earthly reason to be nationalistic... about China.
 

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
Last year, the owner of china-military.org wanted to collect donations to pay for a satellite photo of Mengzi AFB and PLAAF 44th Division to see how many J-10's there were. But unfortunately I don't think he got around to it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


If we were to take F-16 production history as an example, the first F-16A block 1 had production run of only 94 aircraft, then 197 for block 5, 312 for block 10, 983 for block 15, and so on.

The J-10 toay is prolly still in the "Block 1" or "Block 5" equivalent stage where only 100-200 are made for service & evaluation. As the platform receive further upgrades and become more mature, we'll prolly see larger batches.
 

ChinaWall65

Banned Idiot
Gollevainen said:
Oh, And I blame nationalism becouse otherwise I would have to blame you kids personally and that wouldnt be nice;) ...and anyway as you say it yourself, you are beeing proud of J-10, aka connecting j-10 to your nationalist feelings. Anyone taking part of international defence discussion knows that its a recepy for disaster.

nationalism is a good thing, i don't think anyone here is ashamed of their own country

Gollevainen said:
Imply...let's see it could imply that the gods of high-pass turbofan engines have been angry and are not allowing chinese to install them to any planes unless proper sacrifices are beeing made. We cannot base any fact on implying or assumptions....things based on those are called assumptions or speculations.


I think MIGleader's statements is more like deductive reasoning rather than speculation since there is no greater generality than MIGleader's premises that China is ordering more engines while China is not building any more Su27 so that leaves the engines to be fitted on more J10s
 
Last edited:
Top