Come on are you serious?
i will mention a few facts to prove how wrong you are:
A) T-50 has F-22 type intakes, diamond shaped and not F-15 or Su-27 like wedges
B)T-50 has semi ventral intakes, not ventral not lateral, it has intakes in the same position to Rafale since part of the inner lateral wall of the intake is attached to the lateral fuselage side, Su-27 has a pure ventral intake, the lateral walls never touch the fuselage and is the upper horizontal wall that is attached to the Fuselage and where the boundary layer splitter and gap separates the intake from the fuselage.
C)T-50 has LEVCONs and not LERX and the leading edges are aligned with most wings and intakes and tail, Flanker has not such features.
D)T-50 has an all moving vertical tail, its position is like F-14 but it works like the one of SR-71 and YF-23, not similar to Su-27
E) T-50 has different wing leading edge angle of sweep due to super cruise needs, a feature not seen in Su-27
T-50 has 30% composites and 70% of them on the fuselage.
T-50 has smart skin, it means it has smart RAM, by the use of 5 passive and active radars .
common features with Su-27 are fuselage-wing blending and widely separated podded engines, these are also common features with YF-23.
Its weapons bays are also like YF-23, this reduces the frontal fuselage area making for a small nose like YF-23.
Main critics claim the engine nacelles are like Su-27, and are not as stealthy like flat bellies of F-22, this is very subjective since flat surfaces concentrate the radar signature in one direction, while tubular ones are omni directional but reflect weaker signature peaks and treated with RAM and composites and attaching a booms reduce greatly the radar signature of the nacelles and reduce the air drag .
I'm very serious Bubba, and I'm the one who told you 055s fuse was toast and that Sukhoi would pull a fuse off the line and plug and play 055s wings, tailfeathers, and thangs. (which is what they are doing by the way, should fly soon? I hope, I hope!) So while you make some awesome observations, this is a very kooool airplane, I am the pilot and airframer here on SDF, and when I am wrong, I issue very upfront, public, and heartfelt apologies, but, I do really enjoy "boxing your ears" once in a while, cause you are still a pup. The "Old Dog" has to have a little fun keeping you young-un in line.
So just for instance your "LEVCONS", that you love so much, really LockMart is not losing sleep thinking, man I sure wish we could put LEVCONs on the F-22, F-35, sixth gen proto-type???? whatever???
While they are kool, they kinda add some mojo to the T-50, I ain't that impressed! Something else to break? have to tweak? try to keep it all doing what its supposed too???? and working with the rest of your FCS??
I love ya man, I do consider you my Bubba, but you are my little Bubba, you oughta show a little more respect to your elders, or you will grow up with funny lookin ears??? no disrespect, but you've gotta earn your place, and you gotta know your place, I listen to everybody, and I learn a lot everyday.
I know who the Big Dogs are, and I don't pull their ears???
oh, and as far as "proving me wrong??" whats that all about, I am well aware to the T-50, its a great airplane, but if I were in a Raptor, and you were in a Sukhoi,,, well lets just say I'd send ya some flowers?? LOL, earnestly and respectfully your Bubba, the AFB, but I do love the PAK-FA, I do, and I am impressed, wish I had one to "play with"!
