PLAN Carrier Strike Group and Airwing

Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

This entire question of whether the first PLAN CATOBAR carrier will be steam or EMALS depends entirely on when the PLAN started their steam cat research and how far they are along with it at present, versus the same question for EMALS.

The last few posts by by78 suggest the PLAN steam catapult programme might span back many decades, in which case they might actually have a steam cat ready for service now versus an EMALS in five years, for example.


Question of logistics and infrastructure might be less important than we think, because the PLAN have built limited production vessels in the recent past before settling on mass production.

Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

by78 said:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This thread has more info. on Chinese carrier plans from 'POP3', who is apparently an insider with an excellent track record in providing accurate information; he could be an 'official leaker'.

Chinese speakers here, please help me summarize, as my Chinese is rudimentary and am hopeless in comprehending internet slangs.

Many thanks in advance!

Click to expand...

I am from Hong Kong and may summarize these thread for you

1.) "POP 3" suggest there is no point for PLA to having a EMALS on board as the main concert now is first to "HAVE" a reliable catapult system. Whether it is advanced in tech. is not that important as the recent geopolitical environment doesn't allow to have any further delay in carrier construction.

2.) Steam catapult system would be a certain thing to be install at 2nd gen. carrier (002 it means), 001A implied already in construction and would be a modified version of Liaoning (without catapult system for sure), which the bad ship hull design in Liaoning restrict the proper training and limiting carrier operation experience.

3.) Steam catapult system is matured in China, which research can chase back to 1980s., the satellite photo of catapult system at internet previously are actually a steam catapult system rather than EMALS, EMALS research just started few years and still remains at researching status and still highly unreliable in practice(even to USN).

4.) However, EMALS and steam system is not in contradiction, PLA want the most advanced tech. be obtained but not with a big jump into it. POP 3 take india as a counter example in this case.

Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

Watch for J-15 with modified nose gear to allow catapult operations. If you see something like that it means that China does have plans to build CATOBAR carrier soon and therefore they have chosen steam technology - for now.

Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

Bltizo said:

This entire question of whether the first PLAN CATOBAR carrier will be steam or EMALS depends entirely on when the PLAN started their steam cat research and how far they are along with it at present, versus the same question for EMALS.

The last few posts by by78 suggest the PLAN steam catapult programme might span back many decades, in which case they might actually have a steam cat ready for service now versus an EMALS in five years, for example.


Question of logistics and infrastructure might be less important than we think, because the PLAN have built limited production vessels in the recent past before settling on mass production.

Click to expand...

Read Wikipedia "HMAS MELBOURNE (R21)" ending of 3rd paragraft will give us an idea of how long they have been active.

Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

Apparently, 90 female sailors are serving aboard Liaoning.

If anyone has reliable info. on the barrel count for the Type 1030 CIWS, please share with us. Thank you.

Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

Lezt said:

I don't agree, steam cats can easily be insurance even if EMAL is the main push. Honestly, why not put some money in R&D or espionage for a mid last century technology; it is not going to be expensive. Why risk having EMAL fail with no alternative? it is just risk management and China is obviously rich enough and having sufficient skilled people to do it.

Click to expand...

There is no such thing as being "rich enough" no one is ever rich enough certainly no defence budget is rich enough

When you have big navy bringing down the unit cost is paramount

It costs in excess of $7 million per day to keep a carrier strike group deployed on average if you have 4 CSG deployed per year which is typical of the USN that's more than $10 billion in operating costs alone let alone the overhauls and mid life upgrades

This is for a 4 Nimitz Class the price for 4 Ford Class would be 10% lower due it's better efficiency in fact a Ford Class over a 50 year cycle has a $4 billion saving over a 11 carrier fleet that's $44 billion in savings pretty much equivalent to 3-4 x Ford Class so you are getting 11 carriers for the price of 7-8

All electric system, EMALS and the absence of steam makes ships much more efficient which has long term benifits all world navy's knows this and everyone is getting intelligent how to save money while increasing the capability

Liaoning is not the best design and it's not most efficient so Chinas next carrier will bridge these gaps

Cats and Traps or EMALS for Chinas next carrier? Well that question no one knows I have tried to highlight the benifits of the latter

Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

Ahh ha!..Found this on sina..

03.17.2014...There are 90 female PLAN (Chinese) sailors aboard the PLAN (Chinese) aircraft carrier Liaoning. All working in different ratings they are well represented on board the ship. The Chinese captions state that the women are treated equally as the men aboard.

Click to expand...

Any sexist comments and you will be suspended!!

Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

Those are some good images. Pops what do you think of the Helmets and Safety gear? Looks like heering protection, possibly fire retardant fabrics.
The helmet looks like it only protects the foreword portion of the head.
Goggles look like they offer dust protection I am not sure about much else.

Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views



What's that square red button on that protective oxygen mask for...anyone knows?

Re: PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme..News & Views

Equation said:

What's that square red button on that protective oxygen mask for...anyone knows?

Click to expand...

Probably a master O-2 shutoff, in case of burn-through or flames????