JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

Are there any updates on the WS-13 Taishan engines? Also, whether it would be WS-13 (100KN) or the (85KN) engine that will enter mass production? And would the new batch of (50) FC-1 Xiaolongs/JF-17 Thunders, be incorporating the new WS-13 Tiashan engine?

Could someone please be kind enough to answer these questions.

Thanks in advance!

Mujahid Achakzai


#too early to say as of now brother, the 3rd sqaudron of JF17 is due to stand up in next month or May, and JF17 Block II is in production lines and a squadron will be operational before 2012, that is 2 sqaudrons in 2012, 1 sqaudron of JF17 Block I and 1 sqaudron of JF17 Block II

the 3rd sqaudron will have RD-93 engine, however the big question is what will Block II have? information seems to suggest it still may use the Rd-93, there are still alot of RD-93 that China has and they will continue to use them, that new batch of 50 is likely the 3/4 sqaudron that will go operational

cant see WS13 hitting the JF17 this year anyway, and production of JF17 next year will hit 25 aircraft per year

we will have 3 sqaudrons of JF17 Block I
lets say by end of next year we have 3 sqaudrons of JF17 II (if we stand up 2 sqaudrons next year)

thats around 100-110 aircraft, China will still have 40 or so RD-93 left over from the 150 order

it might be around 2013 or more like 2014 before JF17 has WS13, however like most cases, we never know it could emerge faster than this
 
Last edited:

Lion

Senior Member
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

:)

VaCRq.jpg

Old FC-1...
 

ZELEGEND

New Member
Registered Member
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

I heard that the Jf-17 and F-16A were involved in several experimental dogfights. Some say the JF-17 dominated some say it was evenly balanced. Some say the JF-17 beat the F-16A on the horizontal plane but the F-16 wins on the vertical plane due to thrust-to-weight ratio.

Is there any concrete resources out there on these trials?
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

I heard that the Jf-17 and F-16A were involved in several experimental dogfights. Some say the JF-17 dominated some say it was evenly balanced. Some say the JF-17 beat the F-16A on the horizontal plane but the F-16 wins on the vertical plane due to thrust-to-weight ratio.

Is there any concrete resources out there on these trials?

no such comparison exists

however F16 pilots who have flown the JF17 have said that the situtaional awareness and the man/machine interface is far superior to what F16 has, obviously we are talking about our F16 A/B

in terms of manouvering the JF17 is a extremely agile fighter, no suprise since it was a pre-request by PAF pilots even before JF17 flew

and considering PAF pilots mastered the art of dogfighting atleast 2 decades ago u can say JF17 is pretty close to F16 C/D block 52+ we also operate

however now PAF is shifting towards BVR, this is one experience we have not mastered, BVR is the new horizon for PAF, with addition of advanced missiles like SD10 and ZDK-03 AWACS, mid air refueling and Erieye now PAF is mastering BVR combat to fight at long range, before this we always train to get in close and take away the longe range advantage India has, but now PAF can fight long range and off course short range which is our pilots greatest strength

in this respect JF17 is much better, simply because we can change the set up for whatever mission we want to use it for,we make all the parts and its not expensive, JF17 is flexible and can be tailored to what the requirments it is needed, i.e anti-ship role, ground attack, WVR and BVR etc

everytime new F16 takes to the skys it costs too much to fly and run, even more in war time, for JF17 we can do all the ground work ourselves no need to rely on anyone for help, have it in the air 24/7 if need be
 
Last edited:

Lion

Senior Member
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

no such comparison exists

however F16 pilots who have flown the JF17 have said that the situtaional awareness and the man/machine interface is far superior to what F16 has, obviously we are talking about our F16 A/B

in terms of manouvering the JF17 is a extremely agile fighter, no suprise since it was a pre-request by PAF pilots even before JF17 flew

and considering PAF pilots mastered the art of dogfighting atleast 2 decades ago u can say JF17 is pretty close to F16 C/D block 52+ we also operate

however now PAF is shifting towards BVR, this is one experience we have not mastered, BVR is the new horizon for PAF, with addition of advanced missiles like SD10 and ZDK-03 AWACS, mid air refueling and Erieye now PAF is mastering BVR combat to fight at long range, before this we always train to get in close and take away the longe range advantage India has, but now PAF can fight long range and off course short range which is our pilots greatest strength

in this respect JF17 is much better, simply because we can change the set up for whatever mission we want to use it for,we make all the parts and its not expensive, JF17 is flexible and can be tailored to what the requirments it is needed, i.e anti-ship role, ground attack, WVR and BVR etc

everytime new F16 takes to the skys it costs too much to fly and run, even more in war time, for JF17 we can do all the ground work ourselves no need to rely on anyone for help, have it in the air 24/7 if need be

Maybe a superior airforce vs another backward one.. The superior one with BVR will easily shot down most of the enemies one without engaging into dogfight.

But comes to a much more balance fight with both airforce possessing certain degree of electronic warfare. More than half of the aerial fight is back to dogfight again.. Few years ago, PLAAAF conduct a large scale air exercise simulating 2 equally strong aircforce contesting the aerial with plenty of electronic warfare going on supported by AEW and AWACS. Many BVRAAM went astray and many fight settled by close aerial combat..

Which is why PLAAF always regard dogfight as an importan aspect of any new fighter jet.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

no such comparison exists

however F16 pilots who have flown the JF17 have said that the situtaional awareness and the man/machine interface is far superior to what F16 has, obviously we are talking about our F16 A/B

in terms of manouvering the JF17 is a extremely agile fighter, no suprise since it was a pre-request by PAF pilots even before JF17 flew

and considering PAF pilots mastered the art of dogfighting atleast 2 decades ago u can say JF17 is pretty close to F16 C/D block 52+ we also operate

however now PAF is shifting towards BVR, this is one experience we have not mastered, BVR is the new horizon for PAF, with addition of advanced missiles like SD10 and ZDK-03 AWACS, mid air refueling and Erieye now PAF is mastering BVR combat to fight at long range, before this we always train to get in close and take away the longe range advantage India has, but now PAF can fight long range and off course short range which is our pilots greatest strength

in this respect JF17 is much better, simply because we can change the set up for whatever mission we want to use it for,we make all the parts and its not expensive, JF17 is flexible and can be tailored to what the requirments it is needed, i.e anti-ship role, ground attack, WVR and BVR etc

everytime new F16 takes to the skys it costs too much to fly and run, even more in war time, for JF17 we can do all the ground work ourselves no need to rely on anyone for help, have it in the air 24/7 if need be

America want to control too much to any other's affairs ... the USA use it's weapon to press/control the owner of the fighters even let's say Pakistan paid full amount for it's F-16.

Just hypothetically scenario, if Pakistan attacked India with its F-16 ... the USA will be easily embargo Pakistan and will be no spare parts, engine and missiles for the F-16, even worse ... the USA could disable F-16 electronic or missiles remotely. Believe me they could do that.

I don't understand why countries still buying American weapons, I know it is superior compared to others, but the gap is narrower and narrower every day. French, China and Russia are the way to go for any weapon purchase, no string attached.

Bear in mind .... the USA maybe your friend now, may not be tomorrow ... the history tell us .. it is the case
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

America want to control too much to any other's affairs ... the USA use it's weapon to press/control the owner of the fighters even let's say Pakistan paid full amount for it's F-16.

Just hypothetically scenario, if Pakistan attacked India with its F-16 ... the USA will be easily embargo Pakistan and will be no spare parts, engine and missiles for the F-16, even worse ... the USA could disable F-16 electronic or missiles remotely. Believe me they could do that.

I don't understand why countries still buying American weapons, I know it is superior compared to others, but the gap is narrower and narrower every day. French, China and Russia are the way to go for any weapon purchase, no string attached.

Bear in mind .... the USA maybe your friend now, may not be tomorrow ... the history tell us .. it is the case

And what makes you so sure the the French, Russians and Chinese do not install 'black boxes' (either physical or digital) in the weapons that they sell on the international market?

It's not just the USA that may be your friend today but not tomorrow, that statement could just as easily apply to anyone else. And it's not just the Americans that have a past history of cutting off supply or spares and munitions if you go to war with someone they like. The Falklands war could, and almost certainly, would have gone a lot differently if France had supplied more Exorcist missiles to Argentina. Even China has stopped supplying weapons and spares to countries when they step out of line too much, just look at Libya for an example.

If India went to war with China for whatever reason, there is a very high chance that the likes of Russia and France will cut off the supply of spares and munitions to them in any scenario other than China launching an unprovoked and unjustified attack on India.

China and Pakistan has a very close and unusual (in international relations terms) relationship with Pakistan that is only matched by the relationship between the USA and Israel, where the two sides will stand shoulder to shoulder through thick and thin. For everyone else, buying weapons from anyone carries the risk of spares and munitions being cut off when they need them the most. It just cannot be helped, and that is one of the primary reasons why all the real major powers do and spend so much to make sure they are as self-reliant in terms of weapons and munitions as they can be.

In this regard, Pakistan is already on par, if not ahead of India.

India might have all the shinny new toys, but how much of that will continue to function for how long if all outside spares and munitions are suspended?

Pakistan seems to be further along in terms of their indigenous munitions programmes, and is making great strides in making sure they can make spares and even new examples of tanks and fighters. In addition, if it really came down to it, Pakistan can at the very least count on China continuing to supply it with spares and munitions, probably new tanks, planes and ships if needed no matter how much pressure the rest of the world exerts. Can India expect the same of the French, Americans and Russians?

India's primary strategy for a war with Pakistan seems to be to try and deliver a killer, knock out blow in the opening engagements (it seems to be their only strategy since they plan on doing pretty much the same thing in a war with China). That is probably because they recognize their own great vulnerability if a conflict does not end swiftly and turns into a war of attrition. In many ways, this reminds me of the overall battle strategy of the Imperial Japanese during WWII against America. As I recall, that didn't work out so well for the Japanese.

If India wants to be a real, independent military power in the world, they need to pull their thumbs out and develop an indigenous military industrial complex that isn't the butt of jokes.
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

America want to control too much to any other's affairs ... the USA use it's weapon to press/control the owner of the fighters even let's say Pakistan paid full amount for it's F-16.

Just hypothetically scenario, if Pakistan attacked India with its F-16 ... the USA will be easily embargo Pakistan and will be no spare parts, engine and missiles for the F-16, even worse ... the USA could disable F-16 electronic or missiles remotely. Believe me they could do that.

I don't understand why countries still buying American weapons, I know it is superior compared to others, but the gap is narrower and narrower every day. French, China and Russia are the way to go for any weapon purchase, no string attached.

Bear in mind .... the USA maybe your friend now, may not be tomorrow ... the history tell us .. it is the case

well said, American is just friend for season, called seasonal friend

Pakistan has already learnt all the lesson, in 1980s we got 40 F16s, in 1989 we were under embargo until 2001, our F16 sqaudron flying hours were dramaticaly reduced, and during Kargil our CAP missions were seriously hindered

it was thanks to our freinds Turkey who supplied us F16 spares for almost 12 years illegally so we could keep our F16 fleet operational but only just, if it wasnt for Turkey we wouldnt be able to keep F16s in the air for so many years

there was a incident when a Turkish F16 crashed, Turkish authoritys recovered the wreckage, they found stealed source codes and when they broke into the codes this violated the US-Turkish agreement and US was annoyed about it

after that Turkey who is a Nato member and makes F16 parts, told US either to give the source or risk Turkey pulling out of all US deals, US approved the codes and today Turkey is going to re-write the software codes

we know Pakistani F16 also contain the trackers and codes, they can only operate inside Pakistan air space, this is why we cancelled the order from 71 F16 C/D Block 52+ to just 18 and requested more info from China on FC-20, and up the JF17 order

Pakistan knows exactly where it stands with US made F16s, but we do want them so we can have a mix of fighters and also provide us with a top end Western platform which to we can compare JF17 and FC-20

---------- Post added at 04:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:49 PM ----------

And what makes you so sure the the French, Russians and Chinese do not install 'black boxes' (either physical or digital) in the weapons that they sell on the international market?
.

french have proved again and again that they will sell to everyone and anyone as long as the price is right

they sold Agosta Submarines to us when everyone was refusing including the Germans, they sold India during the actual war targeting pods for Mirage 2000, when no Western country would sell to Saddam they sold Mirage F1

france dont like to follow Americans, they sell if they wish


China and Pakistan has a very close and unusual (in international relations terms) relationship with Pakistan that is only matched by the relationship between the USA and Israel, where the two sides will stand shoulder to shoulder through thick and thin. For everyone else, buying weapons from anyone carries the risk of spares and munitions being cut off when they need them the most. It just cannot be helped, and that is one of the primary reasons why all the real major powers do and spend so much to make sure they are as self-reliant in terms of weapons and munitions as they can be.
.

Israeli milks America for only its own purpose, they are known to double cross Americans and even go as far as killing them for thier own agendas, remember USS Liberty when they killed 34 Americans and injured 171 of them just to get USA into the war against Egypt in 1967

this is what seperates Pakistan and China from Israel and USA, we dont care about politics cus we are friends on personal basis

when Chinese visit Pakistan they do not wait in immigration lines nor do they face entry requirments for them its free, as our guests they are most wellcome

on the other hand, no matter what US does, Pakistan will always stand by China, simply reason, we have seen the commitment China has to Pakistan, over decades

in 1998 when Clinton fired Tomahawk missiles in Afghanistan a great number of them did not go off, they were captured by ISI and brought back in tac and shown to China, few years later Babur cruise missile was launched

even more recently a Predator drone was captured in almost working condition and reports seem to suggest it was also shared with China as was the tail rotor of the "stealth" blackhawk which was downed in the Bin Laden raid


India's primary strategy for a war with Pakistan seems to be to try and deliver a killer, knock out blow in the opening engagements (it seems to be their only strategy since they plan on doing pretty much the same thing in a war with China). That is probably because they recognize their own great vulnerability if a conflict does not end swiftly and turns into a war of attrition. In many ways, this reminds me of the overall battle strategy of the Imperial Japanese during WWII against America. As I recall, that didn't work out so well for the Japanese.

If India wants to be a real, independent military power in the world, they need to pull their thumbs out and develop an indigenous military industrial complex that isn't the butt of jokes.

this is true to a extent, it is said that Pakistan can sutain a full blown high tempo war for 7 days if they go all out, before we are low on stocks of ammunition

however we also know that because India has much more resources we need to use every aspect of warfare, each and every bullet counts, we need to utilize what we have to 100% so make things equal, so when we designed our national highways the military requirments were taken into account

in high mark PAF excersie even C130 were landed on our M1 motorways, our motorways are designed for land and takeoff for fighter aircraft and also arm and re-fuel

so we can make up for our lack of resources by using what we have more effciently
 
Last edited:

Lion

Senior Member
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

I seriously believe China J-10B or even J-10A is better than F-16 blk 52. If not, US will not sell it to PAF. Definitely, Chinese delegation had already shown or even disassemble one for study by PAF. The AIM-120 missiles are also shown to the Chinese. But it might be a earlier version and inferior to SD-10.
 
Top