PLAN Anti-ship/surface missiles

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
Its good that PLA is noticing all the gaps in capabilities and addressing them one by one. I also talked about a zircon equivalent, now they have it too.
Eh, the PLA could probably had a Zircon equivalent much earlier, but likely choose not to, as they weren't satisfied with some specs.

Like, if the Zircon is a 1st gen HCM, the ones China is fielding could be seen as 2nd gen.
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Its good that PLA is noticing all the gaps in capabilities and addressing them one by one. I also talked about a zircon equivalent, now they have it too.

What he means is that the fact you were talking about it just came across as a bit unnecessary because everyone already knew the PLA had such projects at minimum in late stages of testing/development if not already in service, considering these projects would have been initiated years ago.

The lesson being "maybe be less vocal about payload/platform/weapons anxieties"
 
Its good that PLA is noticing all the gaps in capabilities and addressing them one by one. I also talked about a zircon equivalent, now they have it too.
I was under the impression that they have been working on that one for quite some while, but I guess they must've sped the development process upon seeing your request.

For what its worth, you were correct in your judgment that the fact that only a single YJ-12 could be carried by a Flanker was a major enough limitation for a successor system to be developed. I would not have expected such a system to be a very high priority (relative to hypersonic systems, when it comes air-launched missiles). It's amazing to see that China now has the sufficient R&D base to be working on such a diverse and complete variety of systems concurrently.
 
Last edited:

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
YJ-12 was sort of the land, air and sea launched supersonic cruise missile that performed anti-surface and anti-ship roles. Land and sea based YJ-12 range should be around 500km (although we heard in past true range is longer) while air launched should be more if booster is the same but air launched booster might be smaller or different so air launched YJ-12 range could be comparable to the ship and land launched version. We've never seen a J-15 carry YJ-12. So while India's air launched Brahmos is Su-30MKI carried only. China's YJ-12 air launched version has only been carried by H-6. Both H-6 and Su-30MKI are land based aircraft.

Now YJ-15 can be considered a carrier based launched supersonic missile since it supposedly can be J-15 launched and the size does look considerably shorter and slightly thinner than YJ-12 and Brahmos. this gives the missile much more range and flexibility of use.

But air launched Brahmos is highest end in Indian service. China has hypersonic cruise missiles that can be sea, air and land launched. Hypersonic glide missiles too and hypersonic cruise and/or glide that as of now confirmed at least 6 types overall (DF-16, H-6 ALBM, DF-17, DF-27, YJ-17, YJ-20) that can be sea, air and land launched. Now also has YJ-15 that can be ship and air launched as another smaller supersonic cruise missile that probably retains similar range as the larger ones - YJ-12. Let's not forget all the stealth cruise missiles in PLA service. We haven't counted the anti-ship ballistic missiles DF-21D and DF-26 or the near hypersonic DF-100 cruise missile.

They will also have smaller supersonic cruise missiles replacing YJ-15 as YJ-15 is supposedly acting as stop-gap for carrier fighter launched supersonic anti-ship missile. All of this is many leagues higher than what India has managed to do with a joint venture of a Soviet missile the P-800 Oniks derived Brahmos. We wont even bother counting the numbers in service and the manufacturing rate.

Also YJ-12 numbers are numerously more than Brahmos. India required Russian parts for Brahmos still. YJ-12 can be pumped out at whatever rate desired. We haven't even gotten into the aircraft numbers and capabilities gap between India and China. It is not a comparison. It is a comical comparison, gapped greater than 1990 China and 2025 US.

China has all types covered, 3 times over at least, with higher production rate, lower costs most likely and has tiers of higher level weapons the others don't even have... except the US and Russia who have a few of the arsenal China has already fielded.
 
Last edited:

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
YJ-12 was sort of the land, air and sea launched supersonic cruise missile that performed anti-surface and anti-ship roles. Land and sea based YJ-12 range should be around 500km (although we heard in past true range is longer) while air launched should be more if booster is the same but air launched booster might be smaller or different so air launched YJ-12 range could be comparable to the ship and land launched version. We've never seen a J-15 carry YJ-12. So while India's air launched Brahmos is Su-30MKI carried only. China's YJ-12 air launched version has only been carried by H-6. Both H-6 and Su-30MKI are land based aircraft.

Now YJ-15 can be considered a carrier based launched supersonic missile since it supposedly can be J-15 launched and the size does look considerably shorter and slightly thinner than YJ-12 and Brahmos. this gives the missile much more range and flexibility of use.

But air launched Brahmos is highest end in Indian service. China has hypersonic cruise missiles that can be sea, air and land launched. Hypersonic glide missiles too and hypersonic cruise and/or glide that as of now confirmed at least 6 types overall (DF-16, H-6 ALBM, DF-17, DF-27, YJ-17, YJ-20) that can be sea, air and land launched. Now also has YJ-15 that can be ship and air launched as another smaller supersonic cruise missile that probably retains similar range as the larger ones - YJ-12. Let's not forget all the stealth cruise missiles in PLA service. We haven't counted the anti-ship ballistic missiles DF-21D and DF-26 or the near hypersonic DF-100 cruise missile.

They will also have smaller supersonic cruise missiles (as YJ-15 acting as stop-gap).

Also YJ-12 numbers are numerously more than Brahmos. India required Russian parts for Brahmos still. YJ-12 can be pumped out at whatever rate desired. We haven't even gotten into the aircraft numbers and capabilities gap between India and China. It is not a comparison. It is a comical comparison, gapped greater than 1990 China and 2025 US.
I'm not sure if a J-15 can land with a YJ-12 on a carrier or need to jettison it if not used. If so, It's normal to not see J-15 with that payload unless in a war scenario or from a land base.
 
Top