071 LPD thread

lcloo

Captain
I know the camo is only for storming the beach head and originally designed for SCS, but they quite stands out from the surrounding greens.
I think green brown beige combination is better colour combination for the marine and their armoured vehicles, in order to brand in with the beach sand, muddy earth and green vegetation. Current uniform camo is too eye catching and attracts enemy fire.
 

by78

General
More from the latest amphibious assault exercise:

20704834530_eebc978926_o.jpg

20704919508_f7401519f4_o.jpg

20271868563_a4dc3d3edc_o.jpg
20866606836_833a495a75_o.jpg
20883194362_416a2d0d3d_o.jpg
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
To be honest I am not impressed

This LPD has been around for long enough and these type of half hearted missions do not do this unit justice I mean it's been 10 years how much longer ??

Get the LCAC in there get them loaded and add some serious organic rotary wing and get those silly looking comic Z8 off

PLAN really needs to start using this it's LPD fleet for what it was built

A single Type 071 LPD can really lift some serious men and equipment and it's mission profile is one of the best for a LPD

4 x LCAC and 4 x medium sized helos put it into action
 
To be honest I am not impressed

This LPD has been around for long enough and these type of half hearted missions do not do this unit justice I mean it's been 10 years how much longer ??

Get the LCAC in there get them loaded and add some serious organic rotary wing and get those silly looking comic Z8 off

PLAN really needs to start using this it's LPD fleet for what it was built

A single Type 071 LPD can really lift some serious men and equipment and it's mission profile is one of the best for a LPD

4 x LCAC and 4 x medium sized helos put it into action

They can also use a LHA/LHD for additional rotary air assets.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
They can also use a LHA/LHD for additional rotary air assets.
Perhaps one day...but right now they do not have any...or any building that we know of.

Asif is pointing out the fact that the four LPDs that China has are capable of a lot more intensive amphibious operations with LCACs than what we have observed to date.

The first Type 071 LPD was commissioned in 2007...over eight years ago...and we have never seen her )(or any of the others) with so many as two LCACs embarked, much less the four they are capable of.

I am glad to see them doing what they are doing and believe that they simply are not where they want to be with their LCAC design yet.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Perhaps one day...but right now they do not have any...or any building that we know of.

Asif is pointing out the fact that the four LPDs that China has are capable of a lot more intensive amphibious operations with LCACs than what we have observed to date.

The first Type 071 LPD was commissioned in 2007...over eight years ago...and we have never seen her )(or any of the others) with so many as two LCACs embarked, much less the four they are capable of.

I am glad to see them doing what they are doing and believe that they simply are not where they want to be with their LCAC design yet.
they would actually need to have 4 active Type 726s first!

Seriously speaking, would be good to see a few more Type 726s in service.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
To be honest I am not impressed

This LPD has been around for long enough and these type of half hearted missions do not do this unit justice I mean it's been 10 years how much longer ??

Get the LCAC in there get them loaded and add some serious organic rotary wing and get those silly looking comic Z8 off

PLAN really needs to start using this it's LPD fleet for what it was built

A single Type 071 LPD can really lift some serious men and equipment and it's mission profile is one of the best for a LPD

4 x LCAC and 4 x medium sized helos put it into action

Exactly.

We use to have an expression.. we'd say they are "half steppin'"..in other words.. just messing around. .lolly-gagging, goofing off. They need to really operate these ships to learn how to use them and see what the PLAN can do with them.

But what do we know..really? They could be working them hard but not publishing the information. But from what we do see these ship are just "Pretty Boys".

Just my opinion.
 

shen

Senior Member
I have said this in the past: I believe the LCAC's lack of ability to control side way motion to be a design flaw, and is what impeding large scale production of the hovercraft.

What I observed from footages is that there is a huge difficulty in getting the hovercraft back into the well deck of 071. If it takes an unacceptable amount of time to have all four hovercraft back into the well deck, then they are operationally useless.

LCAC style bow thruster is just one way to provide increased directional control.

China did use bow thrusters in previous Type 724 hovercraft

a06LdFQ.jpg


There are other ways to provide control
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I wonder if the circled part shows puffer port, which is another mean to provide directional control, on the Type 726.

3eTXHCr.jpg
 
Top