PLAN Type 052/052B Class Destroyers

Discussion in 'Navy' started by tphuang, Sep 16, 2006.

  1. Tam
    Online

    Tam Captain
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    4,875
    Type 726-4 is referred to as the decoy launcher, but when you have "-" followed by a number, it means its only a subsystem. Which means there is a Type 726-1, 726-2, 726-3. 726-1 to 3 are all ECM units. Collectively, all are part of the Type 726 EW system, which are centrally coordinated by a single back end.
     
  2. Tam
    Online

    Tam Captain
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    4,875
  3. Iron Man
    Offline

    Iron Man Major
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2015
    Messages:
    3,015
    Likes Received:
    2,609
    What I would like to see after the 168/169 refit is a 32-cell VLS up front and 16-cell VLS at the back. What we will probably see is 16 and 16, or perhaps 32 and 0. This class could be a pretty decent ASW warship with its 16 potential slant launchers for the long range ASW missile and possibly up to 48 VLS cells, but I just know they will convert the ship into 8 YJ-81 or YJ-12 launchers and put in only 32 VLS cells.
     
  4. Tam
    Online

    Tam Captain
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    4,875
    I am thinking what is the cheapest and fastest way possible. They are not going to invest any more money on this than they have to.

    16 VLS cells to replace the Shtil missile cache on front and another 16 cells to replace the cache in the rear.
    8 YJ-12s.

    One question I have is whether they will take the route with the DDG 136 Sov refit and stick an HQ-10 launcher where one of the Shtil launchers are, either in the front or in the back.
     
  5. Iron Man
    Offline

    Iron Man Major
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2015
    Messages:
    3,015
    Likes Received:
    2,609
    There is certainly enough space to rearrange things into the now semi-standard configuration of one HHQ-10 launcher in the front and one Type 1130 in the back.
     
    Neutral Zone likes this.
  6. adeptitus
    Offline

    adeptitus Captain
    VIP Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    2,167
    Likes Received:
    73
    Perhaps the one armed bandit in the back can be replaced by a HQ-10 to make room for expanded hanger, to accommodate 2 helicopters.

    This ship will not likely be refitted with LRSAM to serve role of AAW DDG. At best HQ16 for area defense and HQ10 for CIWS only. With 2 helicopters it can provide better ASW & surveillance coverage.
     
    Neutral Zone likes this.
  7. Tam
    Online

    Tam Captain
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    4,875
    052B has two Type 730 in the middle of each side. I'm not sure if they will change this if the MLU is in a strict Yuan diet, and I'm not sure if they will still put a 1130 in the front if they already have two 730s amidships. What I am thinking is either the possibility of fitting an HQ-10 launcher in the front ala the Sov refit, or an HQ-10 launcher in the back ala traditional PLAN placement for these launchers. Or they might go none at all like the 051B refit.

    You would have to dig out the second Shtil cache in the hanger to make room for two helos, redo the door for two, and you would have to compensate with another VLS in the front to keep it 32. While it would produce a more ideal warship, in my opinion they will go cheap and fast for the upgrade, keep the two Shtil caches and fill them with A/JK-16 VLS, put an HQ-10 launcher either front or back. The helo remains single. They are not going to change any of the guns, just overhaul them. Replace all the Russian sourced fittings, Top Plate with Type 382, Bandstand with Type 366, Front Domes to their Chinese copies. There is a question if they want to go with the Type 364 replacement radar (see Type 075) or just keep the Type 364. Replace the 16 YJ-83s to 8 YJ-12s.
     
  8. Tam
    Online

    Tam Captain
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    4,875
    Tweet by @Loongnaval. Update on the 052B, or what's left of it. Doesn't seem to have any work done since the last picture. Could be awaiting something first. Here is a ship that's stripped.

    EHPAyItU0AAswrI.jpeg
     
    mr.bean, mys_721tx and davidau like this.
  9. by78
    Offline

    by78 Brigadier

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    5,951
    Likes Received:
    35,111
    High-resolution update.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    mr.bean, jobjed, Josh Luo and 4 others like this.
  10. Tam
    Online

    Tam Captain
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    4,875
    CG modeler Nishikasai Navy does his rendition of upgraded Type 052B using the dual sided AESA as the cornerstone of the upgrade.

    https://twitter.com/10969YUKIKAZE/status/1217459054177447937

    052 B型駆逐艦の近代的な改造案の予想については、(@西葛西軍造艦CG)以前にも例えば馬日天氏がtiwtterに掲載した写真を見ると、この二重波帯AESAレーダーは052 B型駆逐艦の改装に非常に適している。
    Translated from Japanese by Google
    052 Regarding the anticipation of the modern remodeling plan of the B-type destroyer, if you look at a photo posted on Tiwtter by Mr. Ma Nichiten before (@ Nishikasai Navy CG), this double-wave band AESA radar Is very suitable for retrofitting 052 B destroyers.

    EOVIi1kVAAEXyRF.jpeg EOVIiESVUAEyf7j.jpeg EOVIhQVVUAIFMHz.jpeg EOVIgMeUYAAgO78.jpeg
     
    mr.bean and davidau like this.
Loading...

Share This Page